If that didn't give it away I would gladly be adopted by you!
Spike35031 (talk) 04:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please respond on my talk page (user_talk:spike35031).

Hi dogposter, I don't think I really need to be adopted anymore so I've removed the box from my page. Just thought I'd let you know.--Spike35031 (talk) 21:51, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the offer, i'm very grateful you came forward to adopt me. But i've found another Indian adoptee so that the time zone will not be a problem. Thank you for your offer once again!

- Ben (talk) 10:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re Your Message: Your welcome! *Pepperpiggle*^*Sign!* 18:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For this bit of tidying up. See ya 'round Tiderolls 01:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Cheers, --Jezebel'sPonyo^shhh 20:36, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I see you've userfied the topicon for wikigryphons. I was gonna replace the image (since it does not look like an icon; see the wikidragon topicon for a far better example), but since it is in user space, I won't. Would you give me permission to replace the image, or shall I make a separate topicon? • Ling.Nut 07:20, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I'm making new ones. Tks. • Ling.Nut 00:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I AM BACK! YAY! LAN 19:45, 4 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qazamj (talk • contribs)

I came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement. Diptanshu^Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I came across your userpage and thought that I could try to involve you into the discussion regarding my attempts to radically modify the article on Allopathic medicine where my edit as available at this link, had been reverted. The discussion is available at the respective talk page. I had referenced my edits so that the information that might not be known to many, can be verified. I seek the improvisation of this article (along with the related ones) and would like a healthy discussion to be re-initiated in order to improve the article. I would be glad if you show your experienced intervention/involvement. Diptanshu^Talk 14:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dogposter. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:32, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization consisting of over 28,000 volunteers in more than 100 countries. The collaboration was formed to organize medical scholarship in a systematic way in the interests of evidence-based research: the group conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.

Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account. Thank you Cochrane!

If you are stil active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 19:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I've noticed that you haven't been active on WikiProject Pharmacology. Per our policies, your status has been moved from Active to Inactive, which you can view here. Don't be discouraged, though--we'd love to see you come back and contribute to the project! Let me know if you need any help! ―Biochemistry🙴❤ 01:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]