Archives

1

Hey, I think the post on "unfired steam engines" doesnt need its own page. Unfired refers to steam engines that are "cold" or not running. Correct me if im wrong - AH (talk) 07:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@AttackHelicopter51: I guess you must be referring to my post at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Engineering#Requests in 2013? That was in reference to a steam generator, not an engine, ie [1]. I will clarify the post. Derek Andrews (talk) 13:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

my bad i guess - AH (talk) 20:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Derek Andrews. The article for Domenic Marte was previously sourced before this user inexplicably removed them and hasn't made any contributions to Wikipedia since then. I have reverted the article back to the way it was before that editor removed them. Erick (talk) 18:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry, I should have checked the history more carefully.Derek Andrews (talk) 18:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gas Stokers' Strike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectator. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Derek, I've updated the page to add citations, combine paragraphs, and create a more neutral tone. Any other recommendations would be appreciated. SteampunkProducer (talk) 02:26, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That looks better. Apart from the citation we need for his education and early employment -see WP:BLP, I think it quite acceptable. I have added the article to a couple of WikiProjects (see Talk:Bruce_Rosenbaum) which might generate some more input so keep an eye on it.Derek Andrews (talk) 03:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chase the Ace (lottery), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Western Star. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I resized the excellent shot you added for the Tatamagouche Creamery Square because I thought the panoramic photo was just too big to be centered. If you have any questions or comments please visit my talk page. Regards,   Aloha27  talk  12:35, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not see the message on my talk page? Don't prod, take them to AFD if you don't want them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Go through the Nova Scotia lakes. Look in google books. If you think they can't be expanded add them to a list and once done I'll db author them all. How does that sound? Please don't go through and prod them.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK that sounds like a plan. Thanks. Derek Andrews (talk) 12:14, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Portsoy may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/descriptions/137360 Descriptive Gazetteer Entry for Portsoy] (F.H. Groome, Ordnance Gazetteer of Scotland (1882-4)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:04, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newcombe Lake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ship Harbour. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wolfville Historical Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clapboard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hippodrome of Olympia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pausanias. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plasma electrochemistry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Plasma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cindy Chao

added a link pointing to Carat

What You Don't Know (David Belbin novel)

added a link pointing to MP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these min ssages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea to put a final location for the wreck of SS Mont-Blanc. However I cam curious on how you came up with the location co-ordinates? On the maps I tried, those co-ordinates plots out on land, right in the middle of the Richmond railway yards. Mont-Blanc blew up in the harbour at Pier 6 at the foot of Richmond Street. (The book Ground Zero by Howell and Ruffman plots the position pretty precisely.)Dan Conlin (talk) 23:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dan Conlin:Dan, I probably rounded up so as not to imply undue precision and didn't check backwards to see where it landed. I have now added two more decimal places to the coordinates. Feel free to make further adjustments if necessary. Derek Andrews (talk) 00:13, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the adjustment Derek. Pretty much plots out right where she blew at Pier 6.Dan Conlin (talk) 22:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ADRA(UK)logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dr. Blofeld has created Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hertford Union Canal Locks

Sorry to drag you back in time so far, but do you happen to have the reference for the names you assigned to the Hertford Union Locks. I'm assuming it's Edwards, INLAND WATERWAYS OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND, but it would be great to know precisely. Thank you for your time!

Aegidian (talk) 16:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the WP:BLPPROD tag you placed on Jeremy Houghton, as a simple look at the article history showed that it had recently been edited to add promotional material which removed references. I would have no objection to nominating this article for regular prod or AfD, but in the future please be sure to check the article history before adding a deletion tag to an article. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:36, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Category Barnstar
		Awarded for your efforts in the categorisation of articles, in particular for your categorisation of article Tableau politique de la France de l’Ouest sous la Troisième République. Awarded by Cdjp1 on 19 August 2017.

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Nice job on those ISO 4 redirects! RileyBugz会話投稿記録 15:16, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Red Maple Leaf Award
		This maple leaf is awarded to Derek Andrews for writing two new articles and expanding a third during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 15:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating The Gatehouse at Bonds Mill, Derek Andrews!

Wikipedia editor Rodw just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the useful short article. I will add a pic.— Rod ^talk 16:37, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Rodw's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi, I'm Rodw. Derek Andrews, thanks for creating The Gatehouse at Bonds Mill!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Can you add some links from other articles (eg Stonehouse, Gloucestershire or the canal?— Rod ^talk 17:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Liscomb Game Sanctuary a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Home Lander (talk) 22:42, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Home Lander: the problem here is that I want to keep some of the article it was copied from, where it is. As it stands the Liscomb Sanctuary, Nova Scotia article is a horrible mess of two different topics. I maintained the history in the edit summary. The only alternative I can see is to just start over from fresh. Is there a better way of doing this? Derek Andrews (talk) 22:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Derek. I see that Anthony Appleyard has performed a history merge on the page so I think that solves the issue. Home Lander (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, its Halifax Regional Municipality. Derek Andrews (talk) 11:52, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Home Lander:@Anthony Appleyard: thanks, but not exactly what I wanted, and I could have done that myself from the outset. The problem now is that Liscomb Sanctuary, Nova Scotia is a redirect and has lost its history. So, I now have three questions:

(1) is the loss of this history a problem?

(2) can I just revert the textual change that Anthony made at Liscomb Sanctuary, Nova Scotia, or will this impact the history?

(3) is there a better way I could have handled this split from the outset. I did try to find something in Help, but to no avail, so I was probably looking in the wrong places and using the wrong search terms. It must be a fairly common thing to do, probably to split an article that has a section that has grown too big, though this is a slightly different situation.

Thanks. Derek Andrews (talk) 23:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• @Derek Andrews and Home Lander: In the edit history of Liscomb Game Sanctuary, the 22:40, 13 February 2018‎ edit's edit comment says that it was copied from Wikipedia edit 816848276 . That edit is now the immediately previous edit (03:42, 24 December 2017) of Liscomb Game Sanctuary, after I history-merged. The edit history of Liscomb Sanctuary, Nova Scotia is not lost :: it is now at Liscomb Game Sanctuary. This compare across the repaired cut-and-paste point shows that those 2 edits are identical. Where Derek Andrews said "a horrible mess of two different topics", which 2 subjects are those? Currently Liscomb Game Sanctuary is a short article which is about (1) where it is, (2) its history; (3) its biology; (4) its geology; (5) its roads. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 03:42, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Anthony Appleyard:The other topic is [2], basically a rural subdivision of HRM. Derek Andrews (talk) 11:45, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• @Derek Andrews: Sorry, but what is HRM? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Uhh, I see, it is Halifax Regional Municipality. What is the difference between the Liscomb Game Sanctuary and the Liscomb Sanctuary, including who is administratively in charge of each? I have never been to Canada or the USA. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:57, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • • • The game sanctuary is as its name suggests a conservation area, and is administered by the Province of Nova Scotia and was created in the 1920's. Some of it is within the boundary of HRM, some in the adjoining county. Liscomb Sanctuary is a more recent creation, and is the name given by its adminstrators, HRM. It is solely within the boundary of HRM, and includes some of the same area as the game sanctuary. So physically they are different areas with different administrators and slightly different formal names. Derek Andrews (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A proposal has been made to delete Portal:UK Waterways, which you have made significant contributions to, as well as all other portals on English Wikipedia. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion if you'd like, which is located at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#RfC: Ending the system of portals. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:25, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.

Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.

It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.

The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.

A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

Let's do this.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   10:19, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Agile (or Scrum) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

I noticed your prod tagging of Vernon Mills, Nova Scotia — and while I concur with your inability to find it in that form, I did want to point out that the NRC database does list a community in Nova Scotia, in Kings County no less, called Vernon Mines, which means "Mills" is just a spelling error rather than an outright hoax. That said, per WP:GEOLAND we would still have to reliably source an article about Vernon Mines to something more than just the NRC database alone, so it's still not actually in undeletability territory yet, but there is a lead for determining whether the article is salvageable or not. Bearcat (talk) 21:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I noticed that too, but it is a rescinded place name. It was listed in Place Names of Nova Scotia too. I'm not convinced of the merit in keeping an unlikely spelling error, especially given the number of mirrors that it has spawned, and I see no merit in creating a page for a place of dubious notability that no longer exists.--Derek Andrews (talk) 23:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, yes I want to include more of the films he was involved with as writer, producer etc. Indeed, I might have gotten sidetracked a bit but intend to return. ThanksKoplimek (talk) 01:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   10:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

This month: WikiProject X: The resumption

Work has resumed on WikiProject X and CollaborationKit, backed by a successfully funded Project Grant. For more information on the current status and planned work, please see this month's issue of the newsletter!

-— Isarra ༆ 22:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This month: A general update.

The current status of the project is as follows:

• Progress of the project has been generally delayed since September due to development issues (more bitrot than expected, some of the code just being genuinely confusing, etc) and personal injury (I suffered a concussion in October and was out of commission for almost two months as a result).
• I currently expect to be putting out a proper call for CollaborationKit pilots in January/February, with estimated deployment in February/March if things don't go horribly wrong (they will, though, don't worry). As a part of that, I will properly update the page and send out announcement and reach out to all projects already signed up as pilots for WikiProject X in general, at which point those (still) interested can volunteer specifically to test the CollaborationKit extension.
  • Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Pilots was originally created for the first WikiProject X prototype, and given this is where the project has since gone, it's only logical to continue to use it. While I haven't yet updated the page to properly reflect this:
  • If you want to add your project to this page now, feel free. Just bear in mind that more information what to actually expect will be added later/included in the announcement, because by then I will have a much better idea myself.
• Until then, you can find me in my corner working on making the CollaborationKit code do what we want and not just what we told it, per the workboard.

Until next time,

-— Isarra ༆ 22:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Updates: I've been focusing largely on the development side of things, so we are a lot closer now to being ready to actually start discussing deploying it and testing it out here.

There's just a few things left that need to be resolved:

• A bunch of language support issues in particular, plus some other release blockers, such as the fact that currently there's no good way to find any hubs people do create.
• We also probably need some proper documentation and examples up to even reference if we want a meaningful discussion. We have the extension documentation and some test projects, but we probably need a bit more. Also I need to be able to even find the test projects! How can I possibly write reports about this stuff if I can't find any of it?!

Some other stuff that's happened in the meantime:

• Midpoint report is out for this round of the project, if you want to read in too much detail about all the problems I've been running into.
• WikiProject Molecular Biology have successfully set up using the old module system that CollaborationKit is intended to replace (eventually), and it even seems to work, so go them. Based on the issues they ran into, it looks like the members signup thing on that system has some of the same problems as we've been unable to resolve in CK, though, which is... interesting. (Need to change the content model to the right thing for the formwizard config to take. Ugh, content models.)

Until next time,

-— Isarra ༆ 21:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A final update, for now:

The third grant-funded round of WikiProject X has been completed. Unfortunately, while this round has not resulted in a deployed product, I am not planning to resume working on the project for the foreseeable future. Please see the final report for more information.

Regards,

-— Isarra ༆ 19:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third anniversary. You are receiving this message because you participated in previous years of the challenge but have not yet submitted any article improvements for this year. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved, ensuring that all submissions are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims. Barnstars will be awarded to participating editors in November.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or go the challenge page at WP:CAN10K for more information. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Reidgreg (talk) and WP:CAN10K, 21:03, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:No selected item has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:25, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:The Great Britain/Ireland Destubathon is planned for March 2020, a contest/editathon to eliminate as many stubs as possible from all 134 counties. Amazon vouchers/book prizes are planned for most articles destubbed from England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland and Northern Ireland and whoever destubs articles from the most counties out of the 134. Sign up on page if interested in participating, hope this will prove to be good fun and productive, we have over 44,000 stubs!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:10, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) up for grabs in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 19:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Archive table row month yyyy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Archive table row yyyy mm has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Twitterati. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 14#Twitterati until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:51, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Bishops in South Sudan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:13, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Derek Andrews,

I see that you tagged this article with a Proposed deletion tag. This is a reminder that any time you tag a page for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc.), you must post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. This is especially important for a BLP PROD because the content creator may be able to easily find a reference for the article and so it needn't be deleted.

This notification is done most easily by using Twinkle to tag pages and setting up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator". Then every time you tag a page, Twinkle will post these notifications for you. If you choose not to use it, then you must notify the page creator yourself, either with a template or by writing your own message. Twinkle has a lot of other nice features, like the ability to place other tags on pages, keep deletion logs, report editors to noticeboards, that make it a very handy tool for editors.

Thank you and I hope you have a wonderful New Years! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Christian psychology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Articles that cannot possibly be attributed to reliable sources, including neologisms, original theories and conclusions, and hoaxes

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I proposed edits to fix numerous problems on the Devialet article on the Talk page: Talk:Devialet#Devialet Request Edits for July 2022. I’m an employee of the company and can’t edit the page due to WP:COI - are you able to review the requests? Thanks!Beautreillis6698 (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Order of the Grand Warrior has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 22:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Derek Andrews! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]