Welcome to Wikipedia, Comet Tuttle! I am NAHID and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

NAHID 14:09, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be back on Wikipedia for several days, but I'd appreciate input from anyone who tried to help me. There's more specific information.[1]Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:32, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[2]

It's getting better. I think they might be able to fix it. At least I got a response.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In science reputation plays a large role in securing resources. Places/people with good reputations can secure lots of funds, with lots of funds they can do lots of research, with lots of research they can reinforce their reputation, a strong reputation allows they to secure more resources/funds. As I'm sure you can see its something of a feedback loop. Reputation in science is based on credit (citations, awards, associations...) mis-attribution of credit is thus a big deal especially when lots of grant money is at stake. Check out Merton's 1968 paper, there is no pay wall and its a good read.--OMCV (talk) 03:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse the "stupid question": What does (ec) stand for. --85.178.104.139 (talk) 07:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Refdesk Barnstar What a splendid video link you provided! DRosenbach (Talk

I reread my latest comment on "is melvin manhoef okay?" on the reference desk. It occured to me that you could misread this as an offence. I am totally aware that what you wrote about using the Entertainment desk does not imply you would be thinking this kind of "sports" was an entertainment of any kind, but to where such incidents are classified nowadays by the majority of media-people. So in short: no offence meant; not to you. 95.112.190.236 (talk) 20:47, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out the edit botch in my Reference Desk item. It was indeed as you said, a global search and replace that was a bit more global than I intended. --Anonymous (currently 208.76.104.144 (talk) 05:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC) ).[reply]

Your comment on the subject has set me thinking. Are you saying that there is no such thing...please clarify  Jon Ascton  (talk) 22:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that means Jung is a liar... Jon Ascton  (talk) 11:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tuttle. I was startled, not to say shocked, to find that you had removed my comment from the RefDesk just now. I thought that wasn't something we did on the RefDesk except in special circumstances - and I'm also surprised that you didn't drop me a note when you did it.

OK, you found my reply unhelpful. I intended it to be helpful, and who knows, maybe others would have found it so too. I genuinely couldn't work out what the OP was asking - obviously it was about somebody removing vending machines from the campus, but I could not tell from the question which party was supposedly doing so. I could have just left it for somebody else, but I thought that telling the OP that the question was not clear would be helpful. --ColinFine (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I didn't think of looking on the talk page. Or more accurately, I thought of complaining about the removal on the talk page, but decided to speak directly to you first, so I didn't look on the talk page. Anyway it's done now - I've replied on WT:RD, but I'm not going to make anything more of it. --ColinFine (talk) 08:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated the article for deletion, see WP:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Reference Desk. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 22:24, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be grateful if you could expand (here rather than on that or my talk page) on this comment of yours. You seem unhappy with my mere mention (as one of several alternatives) of the possibility of moving to an alternative to Windows; I don't understand why. And I don't know what the other objection is.

Of course your own comment was polite, and I am not complaining about it in the slightest. And everybody is welcome to dislike anything that I write. However, there seems to be some meaning here that eludes me and I'd like to know what it is. -- Hoary (talk) 11:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job. (I'm not sure a Wikipedia user page is the right place for such a general-purpose document, but never mind that. :-) ) Three comments:

1. 100MB of JPEG picture files will fit on one CD. Not sure what numbers you had in mind there.
2. I'm really glad you included the advice about creating separate user and administrator accounts. I wish more people did that.
3. I agree that in general, disk images can be preferable to backups, and backups can be preferable to just manually copying (or dragging) selected files and folders to a removable disk. But for a compromised system, personally, I feel the reverse is true. And in any case (even if the "backup" is just a bunch of manually-copied files), I think you should put in some kind of explicit warning to treat that backup disk as poison. You must never boot from it, you must never mount it and run any apps which are on it, you must never copy any executable programs back off of it, you must be careful copying any data files which might contain executable content back off of it. (Sadly, the line between "data files" and "executables" is much blurrier than it used to be.) —Steve Summit (talk) 13:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't troll the reference desk. If that was trolling then what about the person above me who asked for Lil Wayne's email? I strongly protest and I disagree with your judgment. Dust429 (talk) 15:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As it is, I see that Jayron deleted his own comment. However, I must warn you that if you remove others' comments, from any talk-page again, in a circumstance which is not mandated by WP:TPO, you will be reported immediately to ANI. ╟─TreasuryTag►First Secretary of State─╢ 08:05, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not "on the contrary" – the relevant guideline clearly states, "removal of others' comments generally does not extend to messages that are merely incivil; deletions of simple invective are controversial. Posts that may be considered disruptive in various ways are another borderline case and are usually best left as-is or archived." While Jayron's comment was definitely BITE-y (though arguably justified), it did answer the question and could not be described as a personal attack. At worst, it was incivil, and WP:TPO suggests that removal of such material is inappropriate.

If there's any part of what I've just written that you disagree with or don't understand, please contact me, and simply be aware that you will be held to account for any removals you make in future which are not mandated by policy. ╟─TreasuryTag►stannary parliament─╢ 17:19, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have quoted a number of your opinions as if they are fact; allow me to point this out.

1. The comment should never have been posted, I think you might agree with that. As it happens, I do agree on this point, yes.
2. Removal of the comment was therefore the right thing to do. No – this principle is contrary to Wikipedia's ethos in general (hence "removal of others' comments generally does not extend to messages that are merely incivil"). Auschwitz should never have been built, but that's not to say it should be demolished.
3. The rules you keep quoting at me are article talk page rules, and the Reference Desk is not an article talk page. It has aspects of an article talk page, but it is not one. This is Wikilawyering in the extreme: to back up such a claim, you would need to either find a policy specifically exempting the RefDesk from WP:TALK, or find a policy permitting the deletion of vaguely incivil comments on the RefDesk. In essence, if you can't produce a better written alternative to WP:TALK, then that will have to do (elements of COMMONSENSE and IAR here).
4. Look at whether the comment should exist on the Reference Desk. Clearly, it should not. See point (2).

If there's any part of what I've just written that you disagree with or don't understand, please contact me. ╟─TreasuryTag►most serene─╢ 17:31, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, actually, quoting policy is not Wikilawyering. I suggest that you read Wikipedia:Wikilawyering thoroughly. The second half of your comment, about the definition of talk-page, suggests that you haven't fully read point (3) above.

I'm not planning to continue this discussion with you, because I suspect you will prevent it from getting anywhere. However, rest assured that if you violate WP:TPO with respect to the RefDesk again you will be reported to ANI. (Please don't respond to this on my talkpage, any further debate on this subject will be deleted without being read.) ╟─TreasuryTag►stannary parliament─╢ 17:40, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should know that I am nominating three pages you created, User:Comet Tuttle/Repair, User:Comet Tuttle/Malware and Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing/Viruses for a collective MfD. Please understand that this is nothing personal, nothing tit-for-tat: I simply stumbled across one of them while looking through your contributions during our discussion a few minutes ago. ╟─TreasuryTag►most serene─╢ 17:45, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you may remember that a couple of weeks ago, I warned you that deleting others' comments from the RefDesk violated WP:TPO and you informed me, "The rules you keep quoting at me are article talk page rules, and the Reference Desk is not an article talk page."

However, I should let you know that today, I happened across Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Guidelines, specifically the section #When removing or redacting a posting which clearly states, "When removing or redacting someone else's posting, the usual talk page guidelines apply." Which was exactly my point all along.

So I was right, and policy did prohibit your actions, and your Wikilawyering was not only Wikilawyering but also completely mistaken. For this reason, I hope that you will not delete others' messages from the RefDesk again. Thanks. ╟─TreasuryTag►Tellers' wands─╢ 16:31, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The section heading is not the guideline. The body of that paragraph identifies WP:TPO as the policy, which states that you should not remove comments unless they are flagrantly and solely breaches of the rule against personal attacks. OK? ╟─TreasuryTag►draftsman─╢ 16:54, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think that phrases like, "trying to bully me into submission," make you look like someone interested in contributing to a collaborative project? ╟─TreasuryTag►constablewick─╢ 17:24, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's a temporary workaround you could employ, detailed here. I've tested it in preview with the full size image, and it does work. All the best, Steve ^T • C 13:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Comet Tuttle, I've mentioned US non-participation at the top of the working holiday visa page, re discussion on the reference desk. Is that the right thing to do? I'm just a n00b :) Cod Lover Oil (talk) 19:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your clarifying comments at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities#Capitalization in legal documents! 75.108.193.135 (talk) 18:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comet Tuttle. You have new messages at WP:RD/E.
Message added 17:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

╟─TreasuryTag►Africa, Asia and the UN─╢ 17:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lol --TylerDurdenn (talk) 21:51, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK I will try to spend more time writing answers but I do not like to get edit conflicts. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 18:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They archived the discussion, but I thought I'd let you know I haven't gotten a satisfactory response at the Microsoft forum. One person gave detailed instructions for the reinstallation of IE8. Not going to happen. This is a minor annoyance and something like reinstalling will just create bigger problems. The people on that forum have REAL problems.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into that other site. Now that I've had plenty of practice maybe I can report the bug in a way they'll understand. As for using the mouse to go back and forward, it's a habit I'm just not going to break. The table is too small anyway for me to do much with the mouse. If only Office Max had a size in between this one and that great big one I decided against. But that's where I bought it. Besides, there doesn't seem to be any more room. I can't push the big chair back because there's a box there and it's a tight squeeze to get on the computer now. On the other hand, there's plenty of room between the tower and the sofa. I'd just have to be very careful not to knock the tower over while moving it.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I put a new list of steps on the reference desk. It took a long time for anything to happen, but now it's happening quite frequently, although I quit recording my steps.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:10, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was it you who told me the site? I can't figure out how to report anything there.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 22:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:44, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted a report, but I had very little information I could provide. Somehow I don't think they'll want that entire list I posted here, and there's no guarantee it would reporduce the problem.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:52, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hay Comet Tuttle, i need some advice from you. This person who shares my IP address, named Annika (don't remember how i found out), is fraiming me about a forem thing. She put a forem thing on my talk and i do not appreciate it, what can i do till i get an account. PS: please help my question on the entertainment section of the reference desk, thanks friend. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 05:25, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cancel that 204.112.104.172 (talk) 18:49, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please delete if possible

I go to ask questions to help me with a movie, and they tell me i am using it as a forem, just because that coppy-cat Annika made forems and coppied my spelling mistakes. Why is everyone trying to be a judge judy to me, not Annika? I would also like you to talk to Britmax about this whole forem thing, it seems like this person thinks that they are judge judy. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 11:06, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

cancel that, reference page is helping me, please delete asap. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 18:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I got yelled at for not asking a question. It's hard enough just to describe the problem. Anyway, I lost two buttons but Alt-Tab would only take me to the two buttons that were left. The other buttons magically reappeared.

And I just had that forward button disappearing/back button taking me forward coming back here from getting the address of my reference desk question(only it was Alt-left).Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 15:36, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was you I told, but I guess not. I had a hard enough time finding the courage to even have a computer by myself without someone to help me if I got in trouble. It helped when the cost of Internet access went way down, but gas was $4 a gallon too. So that was an incentive to stop going to libraries as much. The idea of trying to do something so complicated as switching to Firefox is just too much. I don't know how to make his any clearer.

And I am serious when I say that at the library, with Firefox, the buttons disappeared and their windows would not come up with Alt-Tab. They magically reappeared later, and when one came back clicking on it twice made the other missing window come back. Not its button, though that did come back. You said it bwas the popup software doing it somehow so maybe that's it.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the forward button problem is just an annoyance and no big deal. I just thought it would be a bug someone had heard of. I still haven't gotten around to reporting it, but I am registered on the site.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:26, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the reference desk topic. It happened today (though not the Alt-Tab part, since this time there were only two and one disappeared briefly), and the man in charge of the computers didn't see it happen.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It just happened. I had three buttons. I tried to switch to one of the buttons while an ad was very slow to come up, and then the button wasn't there, and Alt-Tab won't make it come back. A few minutes ago, one button disappeared, but by clicking on one of the buttons twice, the window came back and then the button did too.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 22:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And it just came back. The reason the times are the same is I used this page as a notepad while waiting for my real notepad to come back.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 22:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really needed it to work, too. I guess what happened was I went forward too many times and stored too much stuff.

I don't know how to get back to where I was.

I'm at a library so I guess I can ask for help.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, didn't need to. How I got there was a pop-up. I just needed to go back on the page I started from.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 17:33, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hay comet tuttle, cool name. did you name yourself after the commet? or are you an alien from the comet who's name is tuttle lol. I am a big fan of space stuff and alien shows. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 18:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i am having probloms with asking reference desk. i am trying to ask where to find the future cast of wordgirl and it ignores it. I hope there is no nonsense about me saying "imdb is not helping me" help me please, thanks. Please answer on my talk page asap. thanks. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 02:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I type in the question: "dear wikipedia, can someone help me find out where to find the future cast of wordgirl, like in the upcoming season 3 episodes, because imdb does not have anything after "lady redundant woman gets the blues thanks." Then i sign the post, and when i save it, it goes blank and then it just goes back to the edit. when i leave the page, it's like i wasn't there to begin with. please get back to me asap. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 09:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried the new section, it worked like a charm, thanks CT! If you have an answer to my question, feel free to answer it. PS: If you look at some of the wordgirl cast, i notice it is made up of comedians and big actors. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 10:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that people are ignoring my questions on there, especially when i ask about who does a voice. Someone please answer the northwest profiles and wordgirl questions please, or i may coppy the question and ask until the mystery is solved. Please do something in my favour to help me find the mystery without any telling me to use e-mail as i am having trouble with it. ASAP, you're ausom enough for me to turn to you, so please help. i don't like being ignored like that when it comes to knowing a voice of a charactor because i cannot read the credits myself as i cannot see, and the freaks at imdb still say that wordgirl has 50 episodes when it is well into season 3. Please help ASAP (sooner the better)! thanks C.T. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 06:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The ksps narrator question does have links on where to go to find the voice credit for the narrator, in fact, i found the ones with each narrator, and i labeled them a b and c so i know which one it is. i don't think you need an expert to find the narrator on it, just look at the credits of these interesting shows. but i do understand for wordgirl episode voices, maybe someone should post them on youtube. as for the e-mail, i am really getting started with it, (i know, i'm almost 18 and i don't really know much about e-mail ) so i would rather wait and turn to you guys who may be able to help me. by the way, the question i asked about the wordgirl voice, the episode in question airs again on sept 24 at 6 pm eastern time on ksps (pbs spokane) and on september 27 at 4 pm eastern time on wtvs (detroit public tv pbs) hopefully that helps you and the others. thanks for trying though. if you do find the answers, then let me know either on the ref desk or on my talk page. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 10:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i reposted the ksps northwest profiles narrator question, if you would like to answer it, feel free. i provided where to go to find it this time.

Please see my talk page for details. i left a section ready for you with the same name as the message on my talk page. this is where you can put your message, thanks. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 10:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are the others ignoring it. they don't need a spaciffic episode, just any episode to see the voice credits. and i did correct the wikipedia article to what i think is right. in any case, Greg Bursand and Michael Bell are definately not multo and bula. they sound more like cam clark. i need your help and others help to help me clear up this matter and confirm my information. i don't want to lead people in the wrong direction. If you want, you can put the real cast under voice cast in the zula patrol article. either way, i would like to clear this up asan. PS: i don't want to seem annoying on the reference desk. that's why i think the people there are givving me the silent treatment. especially on my most recent question. i'm a curious person. thanks. Final note: where i put catherine thompson's name, i mean the person who plays catherine (don't know if that's the right spelling, it could be katherine) on the life and times of juniper lee episode it's the great pumpkin juniper lee. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 12:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help me with my juniper lee question on the entertainment reference desk? i'm trying to find out an example list of episodes on a volume of juniper lee if they release select episode volumes. By this, i don't mean a 50 episode list, just like 5-8 episodes. (just examples from the show, you don't have to watch it, the descriptions will give people an idea on what the episode is about.) Like i mentioned on my recent comment on the reference desk, when the question isn't on the imediate list (when it goes into the archive), i will put it up again so the users will still have time to help me. i want to make it possible for them to do it. It isn't a voice question all though i do mention that mike mires voices monroe the dog, it is just a genral question on what episodes would be on a juniper lee dvd. Like i said, just a 5-8 episode list. thanks for helping me.PS: it's great to have friends like you helping me out. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 22:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See my talk page for a question i tried to leave on ref desk, probloms with it. It has a message from my friend, who has technical probloms when he is on wikipedia. He told me what to do, and i did it. personally, i know what he is saying in a way, but i don't believe his sister heard taylor saying that, i think he read it somewhere, don't know where. it's possible that taylor swift's real name is denise oliver, people do come up with stage names for no reason at all. Just see my talk page for details. thanks. Note: please direct as many people who know about taylor swift and denise oliver to this section in my talk page, it's called taylor swift and denise oliver. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 04:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep an eye on my talk page for this disgussion. thanks. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 15:09, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am starting a new disgussion, see my talk page and keep an eye on it, pass it on to others who might be interested too. thanks. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 01:09, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please get someone to answer the cyberchase question i left? I check both the ref desk and my talk page, and nothing. I told them that all the episodes are on youtube, so they can just type in the name and it will bring it up. Can you please tell the other admins for me to "WAKE UP! it's a new day." I know you are awake, so i don't blame anyone at all, i'm just trying to shed light on my question that is still unanswered. I hope they arn't ignoring me just because of the problom i had with my talk page. (power failure while i was editing caused my talk page to be blanked). Can you please get them to at least consider my question, i can always tell when something is bipassed, it's one of my best gifts i have. Thanks for understanding, cyberchase episodes are on youtube, and all they need to do is look at the credits at the end, put them on my talk page because the answer would be longer, and it's a done deal. Thanks for caring. It's people like you that keep my faith in wikipedia. 204.112.104.172 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I have asked the biz kids question about whether it is Catherine Thompson, Jes Brieden or Someone else who does a voice on biz kids (see the question), and i still am not getting anything, this is my 5th time, i've givven the ref desk a couple months to answer it. By the way, the next airing of biz kids is 7:00 eastern time on PBS spokane (ksps) I also mention a question about the voice of a police officer on wordgirl, he appears in the episodes "wham up" and "granny and clyde" He sounds somewhat like the reporter, and also has a space ghost quality to his voice. I know the voice questions are annoying, but i am working on a movie project, and the voice actor questions i ask help me expand my knowledge of the voice actors, so the movie will be successful. I want to know who to choose for a character so they sound the closest to what i imagine the character to sound like. In my movie, Mr. Jones sounds like the police officer from wordgirl, and Annie sounds like Peg from Biz Kids. I just want to know who it is, so i can describe the voice for when i send in the possibility to a company, that way, i'm not getting constent questions about 'who do you think should do a voice for this character, who sounds closest to what you imagine the character to sound like? Please just, don't let the people just ignore it. More people help me, they are actualy helping my movie, and you guys have helped me figure out some people, but i need the voice actor names for the police officer on wordgirl and peg and biz kids biz quiz on biz kids for this, or the movie characters are ruined. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 00:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please improove this movie idea: Annie is staying in Connecticut to see her friend Joan, and she stays at the "creature in hotel", which is rumered to be haunted. When she stays at the hotel in room 203, she notices really wierd stuff going on. There is a figure that keeps going near her, and she often hears crying or singing in the night, coming from near by the window. Annie goes to the front desk and is directed to Elizabeth Jones in room 204, who tells her about the ghost of Catherine Jones, who died in 1910 at age 13. it is unknown how she dies, but Annie then calls in her ghost hunter brother (Sean Desman), named norman who finds Catherine near the heater in 203. Annie, Norman and the other ghost hunters must help Catherine realize that the people who used to tease her are not there any more, and she can rest in peace. Do you have any ideas to spice the movie up? I.e. How Catherine died, or who should do voices in the movie, or just other additions to the plot? i'm open to new ideas. Please respond soon. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 11:04, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All the sights want accounts, and your ref desk just did a stupid thing. closed my question by kayno or whatever they call themselves. They're just jellous. Anyway, I tried that before, (baby voice) "pwease cweate account." or (baby voice) "youw must have an account befowe youw can post a message. cweate one.", it's annoying, i can't create an account, I don't feel comfertable giving my e-mail out, as i am still a newby at it. Where can i go where you won't need to (baby voice) "cweate an account and wog in"? the Room 203 project means a lot to me because it may be a successful movie. your ref desk is treating me unfair because of the fact that they can't simply put a name down, i asked whether

• Selena gomez
• tress mcneille
• jessica walter
• or sandie rosa

would be more likely to do a voice in the film. I asked it because i am trying to find a good actor so people will wanna watch my movie, and say "hey, did you see the movie room 203? it's ausom! we should totaly get it!" To hear that would mean lots to me, that's why i tried to find someone, all the sights want accounts, and i feel uncomfertable telling my address. Help me please, asap, the sooner, the better. You're a good friend, and tell Larry Mack to reconsider the whole "don't care" thing. thanks. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 01:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a good item for my talk page? Hey, be a biz kid. Now i know people out there may see something in the store that they really wanna buy, (groan) "that's soooo tempting!" but you just can't afford it. Don't just buy it anyway. If you budget your money and save some, eventualy you'll be able to get that item. If you get lots of money, don't just spend spend spend, buy this buy that, oo! that's a good item to buy. use your money wizely and be a biz kid! 204.112.104.172 (talk) 02:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I get the feeling that I am being annoying, as some user said that i am annoying. I saw that a few hours ago when i was online. Should i stop asking questions or is this person just being arrogant? 204.112.104.172 (talk), 12:19pm, 27 october 2010 (us central time) —Preceding undated comment added 08:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I also see that 216 also made a comment saying that my calling myself "<redacted> man" is the s word. Why would he make such a comment, what's wrong with this. I clearly stated that if <redacted> has a problom with me calling myself, then she is free to ask me not to. I don't want Kyle Hanso to be telling me what to do. I know this person, and for the record, though his address is shared with a school, it is also his home address. Do you see anything in my rules or intro that a sane person would find irrational? Notice how i do say that <redacted> may ask me to stop if she feels that she doesn't feel comfertable about it. I'm a fan who just has a crush on her, but i don't state it. Is there anything wrong with my intro or rules? 204.112.104.172 (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Thank you, people like you keep my faith in wikipedia. 204.112.104.172 (talk) 21:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sinse i often call myself '<redacted>'s Man', do you think it is a good idea to have a message on my talk page saying that if <redacted> doesn't think that's a good idea, she can leave a message just under the 'biz kid' message? I do have this message, anything else i can say to indecate that i will stop if <redacted> HERSELF asks me to stop? What do you say? 204.112.104.172 (talk) 06:16, 31 October 2010 (UTC) N.I.M.[reply]

==Voice on juniper lee Who voices Catherine Thompson on the life and times of juniper lee episode "it's the great pumpkin, Juniper Lee" (episode 201)? By the way, i have an account now. N.I.M (talk) 22:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I' m glad I made this a user space article. I knew it would be a long day, but I never dreamed emacs would have a whole different set. I used the two lists you pointed out to me, though I don't quite understand some of what I did and it doesn't make a whole lot of sense, and for Apple I did a Bing search and came up with a list. I'm nowhere near finished because I didn't even start on combinations starting with ALT, and I basically limited myself to sources rather than just copying from Table of keyboard shortcuts in the actual list.

I don't know whether the emacs list would make this too complicated to use. Since there's no overlap, it could probably be a separate list anyway. I didn't even deal with KDE or Gnome yet either, though they seem to have a lot in common with windows.

Since you're the one that answered me when I asked, I'd like you to take a look at what I finally did. And if you're wondering why I can't just search for stuff like I did today, I am at a library (I avoid going to most sites at home) and just because I listed stuff doesn't mean I understand how it works. Plus when I'm at home I tend to get a mental block (which may be similar to what people with Alzheimer's sometimes go through) when trying to do something other than what I'm doing. Today I was JUST doing this, but after a while formatting became like remembering people's faces for someone with Alzheimer's.

Thanks.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:36, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi — personally I don't think it's an improvement on the "Table of keyboard shortcuts" article. Could you tell me what your objective was? (On my first viewing of your version, I was going to object at the inclusion of "emacs", because emacs is not an operating system like the other items are; but then I saw you just took its information from the "Table of keyboard shortcuts" article ... and I'm not really sure why it's there, either.) Comet Tuttle (talk) 23:59, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, if you look at the references, I got the emacs information from a source. Maybe it doesn't belong, and the title "operating systems" may be incorrect if I do include it. I just didn't know what else to use. Still, I did a lot of work with the emacs. I asked the question originally because there were some letters of the alphabet I had never seen with CTRL or ALT. It's not intended to be an improvement but a supplement. If the information existed on the web it wouldn't be needed. For regular Macs there is such a list for at least some of the keys. The best justification I can think of is if someone does something by accident and wants to know what happened. I do it every once in awhile.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 16:58, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the emacs shortcuts and started a new ‎list just for them. There is virtualy no overlap, but I can see where the emacs shortcuts might be useful in the same list. We can assume the action someone is familiar with on Windows or Mac is the same one for which a certain combination works on emacs. So seeing them all together is helpful.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who voices Nemesis on Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends and Hair Razer/Golden Lox on Fairly oddparents? —Preceding unsigned comment added by N.I.M. (talk • contribs) 20:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to write a complaint, but here is what i'm complaining about. Cresix , some admin is trying to block me for contributing, just because i didn't aggree with them on Alexis Jordan. I would like this user to be blocked because of their constent saying that i am vandelizing the articles. Can you get them to leave me allone? N.I.M. (talk) 02:53, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at his edit history: repeatedly adding unsourced information, stating that he will continue to do so despite repeated warnings, and now intentionally adding information to articles. At the very least you're wasting your time with this vandal; I would caution you to be careful not to be an accomplice to his vandalism. Thanks. Cresix (talk) 03:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, me again. IMDB does not say that Catherine Thompson does a voice on Biz Kid$, yet it is true. She may not be 100% notable, but she did it. Anything i could do if someone decides to delete it from the Biz Kid$ article? And as for their claim about IMDB, IMDB never said that Elizabeth Jones voices Poddling on Cyberchase, yet, they excepted that info for List of CyberChase characters. For Wordgirl, it says that Amy Cederis voices Ms. Davis, yet IMDB has no mention of it, yet the article WordGirl still excepts it. so their claim about IMDB having the full cast is wrong. I mean, the same thing is true for Catherine Thompson, she isn't on IMDB, yet she still did it, and that's why i put that in the article and that's why i support that she did the voice. Anything i can do to stop wikipedians from thinking about removing that from Biz Kid$? Please help sune, Regards, N.I.M. (talk) 18:29, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comet Tuttle. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing.
Message added 23:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for helping me about what to do about finding more on Catherine Thompson, as sune as my connection's security is fixed, i'll try some of that stuff. The reason i did all those posts on the ref desk and other places in the article, is because like i mention on the talk page for the ref desk, i have gotten messages that indirectly state that the author of the message doesn't think that i'm right, or at least that's part of what i understand. I understand she is not totaly notable, but she does deserve mention. Voice acting isn't exactly a piece of cake, i would know. You have to get your lines right, make your voice change to what the director wants, which is not always easy and takes some practice, etc. etc. Anyway, thanks for helping me, you are a good friend. I've coppied this message to the others who have helped me with Catherine Thompson and her work on Biz Kid$. N.I.M. (talk), the biz kid, 05:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which commet tuttle do you get your name from? there are several commet tuttles, and i'm wondering which one it is? N.I.M. (talk) 02:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As noted in talk page discussion, you should not berate other editors in front of the OP. Take it to their talk pages. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 20:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This,[3] specifically. You should lose everything before "a few minutes of googling". ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 21:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the comet question from the previous section, your user page pretty well has that question covered, yes? A nice pic. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 22:35, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Comet Tuttle. You have new messages at WP:RD/C.
Message added 08:16, 15 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I like the Asimov quote on your user page. After some digging, I found that many sources claim it is from an essay in the January 21st, 1980 edition of Newsweek. See e.g. [4][5]. I cannot verify this, having no access to an archive that carries it (Google Books seems to only have a very selected subset). But how do you align this quote with a recommendation to Powerpoint? If there ever was a tool to replace intellectual debate with flashy effects... --Stephan Schulz (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your post is a bullying threat. "Do things our way, or suffer".

There is at least one more editor now who realises that Wikipedia is a global encyclopaedia. That is a good thing. That you don't like my way of achieving good things is at least partly your problem.

Yes, I guessed the question was PROBABLY about the US armed services (not just the army, but I didn't push that point), but I shouldn't have to guess. The OP could have done better, and probably will in future. Without such a point from me he would have asked another US-centric question. When is the right time to correct such things? HiLo48 (talk) 03:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's interesting that in your suggested wording you highlight the fact that almost all ignorant, myopic questions come from US based querents. (Oh, and I do like that last word.) I think we have a duty to all readers (not just the person asking the question), when a question is ambiguous because of its US-centrism. This IS a global encyclopaedia, and pandering to ignorance anywhere must never be our role. I appreciate a need for niceness, but, depending on cultural perspectives, asking a question that ignores the possibility that other parts of the world may be able to add context can also be quite offensive to those of us from such other parts. What often bothers me most personally about the ignorant questions is not so much the ignorance, but the arrogance that only things in the USA matter. The ignorance can be cured. The arrogance I'm not sure about.

These discussions are useful. I do learn and change based on them. However, rather than just your suggestion of "Assuming you're talking about the US...", I am more likely to aim for wording along the lines of "I hope you realise that what you're asking can also apply in xxxxx, but because you didn't clarify, I will assume you mean just in the USA." HiLo48 (talk) 02:44, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's so true about the Indians. Many of those are so cryptic I can't see any way I can help. I guess that highlights another difference. Many non-Americans know quite a bit about America because of its domination of world media (even if Rupert Murdoch came from my home town - he yours now!) So at times we are qualified to comment on American matters. But India is still largely a mystery. HiLo48 (talk) 20:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just delete the image sir, no hard feelings! — Ekin(talk·@) 18:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a friendly note that the RDH discussion you participated at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Humanities/2011_September_23#College_dating.3B_sociology.3B_hookups_vs_relationships is still live. You may also want to offer suggestions or take part in the discussions at the Talk:College dating. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 19:01, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Guess I'll have this as the auto-response from now on. Kasher is recognised by at least two English dictionaries from well-respected publishers. [6] I didn't know that it was at least partially recognised until today, but it is. So... both are acceptable terms, at least in American English. This is a case of ignorance on both our parts methinks. :p Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | ^{Say Shalom!} 9 Tishrei 5772 05:33, 7 October 2011 (UTC) Edit: make that three dictionaries and Encyclopedia Britannica [7]. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | ^{Say Shalom!} 9 Tishrei 5772 05:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to your reference desk answer on the topic of Wiki editors rescinding copyright license grant, you're wildly wrong in saying that a license isn't a form of contract. You wrote:

You aren't entering into a contract with anyone. You are licensing the stuff you type. Consideration isn't a factor. Anyway, this question is close enough to a legal advice question that you should just address it to the Wikimedia Foundation, which has actual lawyers who know all about this. Comet Tuttle (talk) 20:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

The license is of course to the publisher, in this case the wikimedia foundation. And consideration is very much a factor, notwithstanding the fact that both of these issues are trivially disposed of. The second part of your comment is absolutely right.

However I'm dismayed at your confidence in delivering the first part of this answer. You're absolutely wrong, and yet you deliver it as though you were supremely confident. The wiki reference desk has been good, in the context of the internet, about avoiding this sort of thing, but I've noticed it's gotten worse lately. Your response to this question is exactly the problem. Ill informed and outright wrong advice without any hint of uncertainty.

I know you're a good contributor, which is why I ask you to reevaluate this sort of answer. It is not a good thing for the reference desk. I'm sorry if I singled you out, but this seemed like a very clear example to me, and I think it belies an underlying trend that is worrying. Cheers. Shadowjams (talk) 10:22, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I created the redirect at Curb stomp. However, you should be aware that the article itself has been proposed for deletion and I have endorsed the prod. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 19:25, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed an edit you removed and that led to a bunch of other edits being removed to various degrees. You were doing the right thing, but a few more things needed to be done. I can explain further if you wish. Regards! :) Franamax (talk) 01:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you don't have email enabled, so I'll briefly explain here. Several revisions of the RD/M page contained personally identifying information about a registered editor of a type that is not allowed. Your edit summary inadvertently revealed the same information. I reported these revisions to the oversight team and they were suppressed in accordance with the oversight policy. Some confusion may have arisen due to the fact that it took a while to get everything cleared up (and there is an apparent MediaWiki software bug), but mostly due to the fact that some/one self-appointed detective decided to engage in idle speculation about what is in fact a quite standard process executed many times a day across the project. Franamax (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Point 1 of the oversight policy. If you need more explanation you will need to email me, or contact the audit sub-sommittee, which also requires email, but not necessarily through the WP interface. Franamax (talk) 19:08, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Replied. Franamax (talk) 21:05, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not doing this at home, but I don't think I need to.

Using Internet Explorer (don't know what version) my uncle's computer was slower than I remember. And on the Asheville Citizen-Times web site, it was a nightmare. I've been thinking about asking about this site on the computing reference desk, but I probably won't run into anyone there who ends up having the same problem. And on that computer even the Sun News of Myrtle Beach was constantly freezing up. I don't have that problem at home, and I never go to the Citizen-Times at home since I can see their articles two or three days later, whereas the Sun News makes me enter the topic for the article I'm searching for if it's more than a day old, which is impossible if I don't know what articles they published.

While I was dealing with the nightmare, my cousin and his wife came in saying they needed to install the new device they got so my uncle could use his new iPad. I took the local newspaper into another room and read it while I was waiting. Just so you'll know, I don't like being in a room with a lot of people, but being in the same house sort of lets me feel like I'm with the family. And I was with them for opening of presents.

I came back and things looked totally different. I don't know why they had done this, but the computer had Google Chrome. It was like night and day. Everything was so FAST and EASY--even on the Citizen-Times! But I feel I would have more problems at home with an unfamiliar browser than I am having now with Explorer. Yahoo mail gave me a whole new set of problems and I had to virtually quit using it. So I actually have few problems at home. I only go to the newspaper web sites if the college library is not open. Just so you'll know, the computer I usually used there since I wasn't a student finally quit working and it has a sign on it (and now they don't care which computer I use, though if the usual one was being temperamental they let me change). It was pretty old. All their computers are Mozilla Firefox and they generally work much better than the one that quit working,though Explorer is an option on one--turns out that's not a good idea.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:12, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I heard my uncle say he was told not to get Norton AntiVirus because it checks everything, slowing the computer down. I don't know if that was the problem, but I know my Norton Antivirus at home isn't like that. I do plan to change next week to my Internet provider's own software, which I think is McAfee.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:18, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask next time I visit.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 21:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Hi, I was just wondering if you had read this before you closed this section on the reference desk. It is fine if you did, but I wanted to alert you to the fact that there is a little bit of a discussion (at least between two of us) about it. In any case, I am on the fence about whether it should be closed or not, so I'm not criticizing your decision to do so. Falconus^{p t c} 19:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, it is now a moot point, as Nimur has removed that section. Cheers, Falconus^{p t c} 19:42, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I followed up here: Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Computing#Wiring_a_Small_Office_with_CAT6_Ethernet.3F. --33rogers (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is information missing from article space on Wikipedia, as far as I know. But I don't know what to use as a source (other than your answer to my reference desk question) in order to add it to the relevant articles. Or how to ask that someone find a source and do this.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 15:49, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Maybe my Google search wasn't thorough enough.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You asked on the Refdesk about a GIF illustrating a tunnel through the centre of the Earth. I think the one you're after is File:Gravity_elevator.gif, linked from the Gravity train article. Cheers, Tonywalton ^Talk 19:49, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Comet Tuttle:

Thank you for your reply to my original post on June 1. I had been very busy over the past couple of days taking my godparents sightseeing around Canada and the States, so I have neglected to check back on this issue.

To make the long story short, my ISP is Bell Canada (known simply as "Bell" in Canada), Toronto to be specific. I have recently changed my plan to Bell's Fibe 15/10 because the discount on my old plan is set to expire at the end of May. As a result of the change Bell sent a technician to my home to do a bunch of new wiring, in the process the technician also took away my old 2wire DSL modem, which had the capability of limiting the speed of incoming wireless connections down to 1 mbps, and replaced it with a new, big, black DSL modem which did not have such an option in its 192.168.2.1 settings page.

I also would like to correct an error in my original post: I talked to another Bell technician who corrected my saying "bandwidth limiting" -- the technician said that no modem/router is capable of limiting bandwidth, which is the total amount of data that my tenants use over a given period of time, and that when I say "bandwidth limiting", I really mean "connection speed limiting", so I would just like to make that correction here.

Thanks for all your help,

L33th4x0r (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Comet Tuttle:

This is L33th4x0r. Thanks for your help. We ended up ordering more usage insurance packages from Bell, making our internet really really expensive. I am getting kind of sick and tired of Bell and am thinking of switching to Primus.

L33th4x0r (talk) 17:07, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia Reference Desk. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia Reference Desk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 19:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message on my talk page, but I'm completely confused about what (if anything) you're asking? Thryduulf (talk) 09:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia Reference Desk. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia Reference Desk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 03:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Venera9.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anon 09:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Venera9.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Anon 22:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC) Anon 22:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Googlelabsimageproblem.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Googlelabsimageproblem.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Old orphaned esoteric file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 17:47, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Venera9.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Comet Tuttle/Malware, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Comet Tuttle/Malware and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Comet Tuttle/Malware during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:02, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Comet Tuttle/Repair, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Comet Tuttle/Repair and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Comet Tuttle/Repair during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing/Viruses, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing/Viruses (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing/Viruses during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Venera9.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:52, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:BadPDFObama.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused free use image with no clear use on the Wiki.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. fuzzy510 (talk) 08:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Venera9.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]