I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Colorado Care. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clr06160! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment they left was:

Please look at other Wikipedia articles to understand how they are structured, their content, and the tone that is used. WP articles do not read like newspaper reports or opinion pieces.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Colorado Care and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 04:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Clr06160. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Colorado Care".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Joseph2302 20:58, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Joseph2302 07:06, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I've blocked you for a short period of time because you made comments in two places, essentially calling Wikipedia editors "bastards" because the page had been deleted as part of a routine cleanup. Even if you're frustrated, saying things like that is not appropriate. The claims that the material was "stolen" wasn't true either. Wikipedia routinely deletes draft articles that have not been edited in 6+ months as part of routine housekeeping. This was in the notification on your page above and it also told you what you would have to do to get it back, so there was no need for you to get upset at all. Once the block is up you can work on fixing the page, but I need you to know that this type of behavior is never acceptable on Wikipedia, hence the block. If you engage in these behaviors on Wikipedia again, I must warn you - you will almost certainly be blocked again, possibly permanently. Take this time to cool down. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:20, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I must also say that you should not assume that someone not instantly responding to a restoration request means that you won't get help. In this case you created the (now deleted) draft page attack only two minutes after you requested page restoration and made this post the minute after that. While there are several of us admins that monitor the board, we aren't watching it every second and there are times when requests can sit for a while, sometimes even a few hours, before an admin comes to the board. There aren't that many admins on Wikipedia in comparison to active editors and of those admins, not all of them are on at the same time - and of that number, only a few of those monitor that board. Requests don't sit for too long, but they can be there a while if the admins are otherwise busy. Patience is something you will absolutely need on Wikipedia, as the site is a collaboration between thousands upon thousands of people who edit at different paces and time schedules, so at some point you will have to wait in order to get an answer or see something happen, just like real life. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clr06160, note that ColoradoCare has an article, which was created after your last edit to your draft (so you could not be expected to know that). When your block expires, instead of working on the restored draft you might want to contribute to the article, because Wikipedia won't have two separate articles about the same thing. Please read up on the verifiability policy and make sure that your edits are written from a neutral point of view. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 11:15, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Colorado Care, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]