Hello, Citronnel, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 06:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 13:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Citronnel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LINE2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Citronnel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LINE2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:44, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I see you've recently created the articles Gemascolex and Gemascolex stirlingi, however, the sources you have used for these articles (iNaturalist and the Ellura Sanctuary website) are not considered reliable sources by Wikipedia standards and should not be used as references for articles. Data on iNaturalist is either user-generated or taken from Wikipedia articles, and the Ellura Sanctuary website is a non-expert self-published source. Please avoid using these websites in your future editing - if you would like help finding reliable sources on particular topics, especially in the realm of biology, feel free to leave a message on my talk page and I would be happy to assist! I have edited both pages to replace them with a reliable source, the Australian Faunal Directory, but wanted to let you know why I did so and why the sources you used are considered unreliable. Cheers, Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 09:23, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ethmostigmus! Yes I do see now how these references could be considered unreliable in hindsight. Thank you for assisting with updating the references and taxonomy box! I wasn't aware of the AFD website before now, I'll be sure to use this in the future. Cheers :) Citronnel (talk) 02:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]