User talk:Cinefilestudio

Welcome!

Hi Cinefilestudio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cinefilestudio (talk) 13:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed template

For reference, the syntax for [citation needed] is {{fact}} or {{citation needed}} (both work). It's a template. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 12:27, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anurag Halder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anurag Halder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anurag Halder (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Yousuf Ibn Ahmad (talk) 15:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's an unnecessary discussion about this famous singer. I have reviewed the page before creating as well all source are verified with high quality evidence and no promotional ref I found. and also its review by an administrator alreday. Requesting you to removed the afd tag. Cinefilestudio (talk) 11:51, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cinefilestudio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have made so many good articles in past check my history. It's been a misunderstanding to block my account, I just only contributed articles which need to stay, I am anware of multiple accounts. Pls unblock me, it's not gonna happend in future Cinefilestudio (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think there is a misunderstanding here, and that the block was placed correctly. This doesn't address what was discussed in the SPI(Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cinefilestudio). 331dot (talk) 07:47, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You placed your unblock request in "nowiki" tags, so it would not have been seen. I fixed that, so another administrator will see and review it. But it seems more than likely that the new accounts and IP edits at the AfD discussion were yours, so I stand by my decision to block you for sockpuppeting. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also suggest that you open the edit window to make your request instead of using the reply function. 331dot (talk) 07:47, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just made many contributions here in wikipedia. And for one reason you can block me I just one account which is I'm reliable God. Just it. I have request to unblock. This is my humble request. I want to give many good contribution here. I just vote the article which I create with all source. I made too many contributions and whati get in return.??? Pls unblock me so I can correct my mistake in future. I just vote the article. Cinefilestudio (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your sockpuppeting has now been confirmed by a checkuser. [1] So, you were not "unaware" of these accounts; you created them. You may want to review the standard offer for people whose conduct has led to an indefinite block. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:25, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand my mistakes. Sp Requesting for unblock. This is not gonna happen in future. I have contributed lots of articles which are in wikipedia now. For shake of my contribution I request to give me a chance. No violation will happen in future I promise. Cinefilestudio (talk) 08:49, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #73729

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:47, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nasha Jurm Aur Gangsters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nasha Jurm Aur Gangsters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasha Jurm Aur Gangsters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.