Welcome!

Hello, Bs0u10e01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You uploaded File:Lichfield Cathedral Feb West Front.jpg, an image which came from Flickr. You have tagged this with a Creative Commons license, but the original Flickr page shows the license as "all rights reserved". We would need the photographer's permission, or the license on the Flickr page changed, to use this. For requesting permissions, see the instructions at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:56, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am the original photographer and it is not the same as the one i have posted on flickr it is processed and cropped slightly differently. Flickr uses creative commons license and i have done so with this one. Is this satisfactory?

Thanks. It's probably best to include that in the upload form somewhere. Cheers, Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:42, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there I have reverted the Lichfield cathedral image to the original as it is of higher quality. Your picture is underexposed on the right hand side making it look a bit poorer in quality and the light on the front of the cathedral gives unnatural colour. In real life as the cathedral is built from sandstone and it has absorbed alot of pollutants mainly released during the industrial revolution and victorian age. This has given the cathedral a dark brown even black look in places which my picture has better captured. In fact appear that your image has been photoshopped in some way to give it a more dynamic vibrant feel which is unrealistic representation of the cathedral.

A tag has been placed on Christ Church, Lichfield requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- mitchsurp -- (talk) 17:21, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re this edit - the ref style was not in keeping with the rest of the article, which uses shortened footnotes via the {{sfn}} template. Thus, I've amended it. One problem: what are the page numbers? Please add these to both the {{sfn|Clayton|1981}} templates in the form of either a |p= parameter (for one page) or |pp= (for two or more). --Redrose64 (talk) 19:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and this could do with a page number too. It can go in the |page= parameter of the {{citation}} in place of the {{page needed|date=January 2011}}. Thanks. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:48, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I remind you that Wikipedia articles need references providing substantial coverage from independent published reliable sources, print or online. There shouldn't be any problem with this one, but I advise you to do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. DGG ( talk ) 23:19, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading his photograph of the Samuel Johnson statue. I have added his into the article in the gallery section. Cheers. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 05:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've noticed some of the nice images you've uploaded of Staffordshire sights. I particularly like the photograph of the Samuel Johnson home. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 19:28, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you changed the class of Letocetum from stub to A. An article is not eligible for A-Class status unless it has been reviewed by two uninvolved editors. Some projects also have formal B-Class reviews, but that was not the case here, so I set the class at B. You've clearly put a lot of work into the article, and you may want to nominate it for good article status. --Gyrobo (talk) 18:53, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided an initial review (on 8 June 2011) of the article Letocetum that you nominated for GA-status. The review is at Talk:Letocetum/GA1 and you have 7 days to respond. Please note I shall be off-wiki for most or all of the next 3 days but feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have in the meantime. Ben MacDui 09:38, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you associated with this? Not a COI question! I wanted to help the museum and wanted a contact Victuallers (talk) 09:33, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lichfield you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lichfield for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Titley Pool, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://herefordshirewt.org/reserves/titley.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bs0u10e01, I noted in the page history that you attempted to rewrite the page; however, it still borrows wholesale from the URL referenced above and is not acceptable. I have blanked the page for the time being; you must rewrite the page in your own words if you wish it to be kept. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! — madman 19:47, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Titley Pool, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Arrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hotel Lat Tour, Birmingham.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:26, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Beacon Park article is close to GA status now. I've identified the remaining work needed with two "important" tags in the GA review section. Folklore1 (talk) 20:08, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've placed the article "on hold". This is normally a seven day period. If you need more time, please leave a note on my talk page so I can extend the hold period. Folklore1 (talk) 20:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping improve Wikipedia. Beacon Park is now listed as a Good Article. Folklore1 (talk) 00:31, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review started.♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:27, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As the article's nominator, you're invited to comment at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Grand Hotel, Birmingham/1. Thanks! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:51, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:New New Street 2011.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lichfield
Thank you for quality contributions to articles around Lichfield, listing buildings and describing them, such as Church of St Chad, and for adding to recent architecture and culture, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 613th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Six years ago, you were recipient no. 613 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 122-124 Colmore Row, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commercial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Victoria Square House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commercial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm in Birmingham - it's good to find another local Wikipedian, and I hope to meet you at one of our occasional events in the area. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Curzon St Illustration.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:40, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alpha Tower may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Estates Group who are set to invest £9 million in a refurbishment of the building.<ref name=pmsa89>{{Citation | url = http://w31 July 2014 the building was listed at Grade II by [[English Heritage]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Chad's Church, Wishaw, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Middleton and Diocese of Birmingham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A few minor issues before I get deeper into the review. Thanks for making the article that got nominated to WP:DYK. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A few minor issues still remain. Please remedy. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:52, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Paradise Birmingham Images.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:35, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harrias ^talk 00:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Our Lady Help of Christians Church, Tile Cross, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Centenary Square, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page International Convention Centre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Centenary Square may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• //news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/401341.stm BBC: You'll either love it or hate it] - July 23, 1999</ref>]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:30, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to an editathon at Thinktank, Birmingham, on 7 March 2015.

The focus will be on the museum's science and industry collection. We will have an exclusive preview of (and be able to photograph) exhibits recently acquired for the forthcoming new Spitfire Gallery, plus talks, and the opportunity to work with curators. Assistance will be available for new editors.

A light lunch and refreshments will be provided. Booking required. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:20, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of public art in Birmingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raymond Mason. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to edit and take photographs at a 'backstage' event at Birmingham Museum Collection Centre, on 28 May 2015.

The focus will be chiefly on the museum's science and industry collection. We will enjoy exclusive access to items that are not normally on display, plus talks, a tour, and the opportunity to work with curators. Assistance will be available for new editors.

A light lunch and refreshments will be provided. Booking required. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:27, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:EastsideLocksNo1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:46, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Paradise Birmingham Images.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2008 Approved 103 Colmore Row.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of active coal fired power stations in the United Kingdom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 20:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Grand Hotel New Proposal.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:07, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bs0u10e01. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I noticed that you tagged File:Edial Hall School 1824.jpg as your own work, when you were in fact not the original author of the image. Please ensure to not tag files with {{own}} in the future if you are not the original author or photographer of a media file. Thank you! Daylen (talk) 03:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Barclaycard Arena Birmingham.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BirminghamConservatoireFCBS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bs0u10e01. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Two Arena Central.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Architecture of Birmingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bs0u10e01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of active coal fired power stations in the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Arena Birmingham Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi according to this https://www.drax.com/investors/completion-of-sale-of-gas-assets/ it states the following "Following the sale Drax no longer operates any CCGTs and on 31 March 2021 will end commercial coal generation, with formal closure of its remaining coal assets in September 2022." suggesting Drax still has 2 weeks of Coal left. Mark999 (talk) 18:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:56, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CGI Paradise Chamb Sq.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thought you might like to know I used your photo of the bridge in its new article! Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I saw recently it had been refurbished and painted red so i could do with getting over there and taking an up to date photo. Bs0u10e0 (talk) 18:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would be amazing to have an up-to-date photo! It caught my attention because of the restoration work. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of active coal-fired power stations in the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of active coal-fired power stations in the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DimensionalFusion (talk · she/her) 23:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]