Hello. If you wish to do so, leave a message after the beep. My signature: --BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 13:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC) (Example timestamp; I have ET time.) *beep*[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Disney Junior Logo 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 13:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Disney Junior Logo 2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:34, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brainulator9, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana (^bananaphone 14:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that in order to have a stand alone article a topic must meet certain criteria as outlined in WP:N - primarily that the topic of the article has received significant coverage in third party reliable sources. The article you created, The Annoying Orange (episode), does not now and unlikely ever will meet those criteria. Per our policy, I have redirected it back to the main article. Active Banana (^bananaphone 14:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:TheAnnoyingOrange.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from copyright work mislabeled as a CC licenced image. The image is already properly licenced at File:AnnoyingBanner.png. As a copyright violation, File:TheAnnoyingOrange.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:TheAnnoyingOrange.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:TheAnnoyingOrange.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:TheAnnoyingOrange.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:TheAnnoyingOrange.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Active Banana (^bananaphone 14:17, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to see an edit made by you today. How are you doing...how are things? (I'm Bryce FYI) --Bmusician 04:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've sent you an email to your aol address. →Bmusician 03:35, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply as quickly as possible - this is urgent →Bmusician 03:44, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Darkstalkers.png

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hey old friend. Early happy 5th Wikipedia anniversary :P Jackninja5 (talk) 08:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then happy Thanksgiving :P Jackninja5 (talk) 01:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BUL9, I hope you are the one in PvZ wiki, because I'm going to feast your eyes with PvZ wiki's secret. Here is the first one: this is a photo of Someone456, mind you, he is seriously under-aged. NapalmRosalina (talk) 14:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That image was post by him on his Facebook user page thing. He IS underaged. NapalmRosalina (talk) 23:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One thing: I didn't want him blocked, just want to share stuff. Besides, how did you make your ~~~~ so fancy? NapalmRosalina (talk) 23:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you think the picture is old? And who is Someone456's brother? How do you know he has a brother? NapalmRosalina (talk) 12:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Snuggums (talk / edits) 01:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey BUL9,
Would you mind bringing a message to Someone456 for me? Thank you so much if you can.
"Dear Mr. Someone456,
Hi, I would like to invite you to Ocean Park to take a Hallowe'en break. We are going to enter some "haunted house" and take photos with "ghosts". You don't need to worry about paying because my dad works there and he got free tickets. I also invited Cheetah-shooter. For date and time, we can discuss together if you can come. Also, we ARE going to participate in the "H15 haunted house" - the special haunted house for Ocean Park this year, only suitable for 16 or above. Hope you can join us! Contact me: 54027177. We will being looking forward to your reply. Yours Faithfully, NapalmRosalina" — Preceding unsigned comment added by NapalmRosalina (talk • contribs) 07:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited This Little Piggy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ...Baby One More Time. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dirrty you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chasewc91 -- Chasewc91 (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dirrty you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dirrty for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chasewc91 -- Chasewc91 (talk) 21:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brainulator9. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brainulator9. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brainulator9. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I noticed your interest in portals. Here is what has been going on behind-the-scenes with them...

Currently, there are about 1500 portals, comprised of 150,000 pages in portal space, the rest beyond the 1500 being subpages. Most of those subpages contain an excerpt, copied and pasted from some article. Such excerpts never change, and they go stale over time (no longer matching the original source material).

The Portal WikiProject was rebooted on April 17th, and has grown to 68 members. We've been busy redesigning the portal model so that portals will not need all those subpages.

The design concept called "selective transclusion", which is used for migrating excerpts (moving them to the base page), does so by displaying part of an article the same as a template. An added benefit of this is that it also keeps them fresh, by always showing the current version of the content that is transcluded.

We are also working on ways to make excerpted content, and listed entries, dynamic, so that the material or links shown automatically change over time without the intervention of an editor. Selected articles, could be set up to change daily, for example, to present a different article each day. This can even be made to show a different article every time a user visits the page. Currently, we can do this from a set list. We're trying to make it so that the list is updated automatically from an external source that is regularly maintained.

Other automated solutions are being sought or developed for each section type of portals. To automatically update and archive news, did you know entries, and so on.

Once we get a fully automated design worked out, it will be applied to all the portals that do not have dedicated maintainers. This will reduce the amount of maintenance they need. A single editor will then be able to watch over far more portals than before, ideally, with each portal taking up only a single page in portal space.

The Portal WikiProject is dedicated to updating, upgrading, and maintaining the entire portal system and every portal in it.

Come check us out, and if you like what you see, feel free to join.    — The Transhumanist   05:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: there are lots of WikiGnome tasks to do, too. -TT

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   00:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

Hello, Brainulator9. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re this, this is inconsistent with MOS:JOBTITLES unless short description is considered to be in title case. I think sentence case seems more appropriate for any description. ―Mandruss ☎ 19:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mandruss: That makes sense. I took the short description as referring to the title, not the office. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 20:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding. This JOBTITLES thing is a never-ending battle, particularly when it comes to the word "P/president". Do you want to self-revert all of those changes, or shall I do it? ―Mandruss ☎ 20:34, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mandruss: If you want to do it yourself, go ahead. I guess you could change the others for consistency, too. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 21:42, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. ―Mandruss ☎ 21:43, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i know u from Pvz and sponge bob — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrNiceGuy2009 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't get a response to this question. I started a discussion and maybe people will respond. One possible argument is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:58, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see that you are interested in the article Robert E. Lee on Traveller. Would you like to review the article for GA?MagicatthemovieS (talk) 19:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)MagicatthemovieS[reply]

Hi. You made some helpful formatting etc. edits to Draft:2015 World Ladies Snooker Championship - unfortunately I was making edits at the same time and, in the hope that I could redo the changes you had made, pasted my newer version over yours. Was it a tool you used that I can use myself? Thanks BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BennyOnTheLoose: - Honestly, I wasn't done with that edit and had saved it on accident! I was going to undo it, but at a later time. Let me know when I can look at the page again! -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 02:20, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

anytime is fine, I have a couple of citations to add but want to re-read it after a break so I’ll be more likely to spot my own errors. Thanks! BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 07:27, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits like this are incorrect. Please don't just remove the markup. Make sure that the parameter (and also the template name) are correct. The cs1 templates after your edit:

{{cite web |url= http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/chi-071009mccain-photogallery,0,6460882.photogallery |title=Image 17 of 49 Republican Presidential Candidate Senator John McCain |date=2000-02-23 |accessdate=2008-10-08 |publisher=[[Chicago Tribune]]}}

{{cite web | url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/02/03/us/politics/20080203_MCCAIN_TIMELINE.html | title=Milestones: John McCain | publisher=[[The New York Times]] | accessdate=2008-05-09}}

|publisher= in both should be changed to |newspaper= because Chicago Tribune and The New York Times are newspapers. These templates should not be {{cite web}} but should be {{cite news}} because the cited sources are newspapers.

{{cite news |url= http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/chi-071009mccain-photogallery,0,6460882.photogallery |title=Image 17 of 49 Republican Presidential Candidate Senator John McCain |date=2000-02-23 |accessdate=2008-10-08 |newspaper=[[Chicago Tribune]]}}

"Image 17 of 49 Republican Presidential Candidate Senator John McCain". Chicago Tribune. 2000-02-23. Retrieved 2008-10-08.

{{cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/02/03/us/politics/20080203_MCCAIN_TIMELINE.html | title=Milestones: John McCain |newspaper=[[The New York Times]] | accessdate=2008-05-09}}

"Milestones: John McCain". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-05-09.

I'm ignoring the fact that neither of these urls link to a copy of the image and one wonders if images sourced at Chicago Tribune and The New York Times are permissible because of copyright ...

—Trappist the monk (talk) 15:22, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Trappist the monk: Understood, thank you! -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 15:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Doug Weller talk 19:04, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller:: Thank you. I'm very aware of the importance of controversial or BLP-related topics being watched for problematic behavior. I also recognize that this is not about my edits personally; I've mostly been doing internal cleanup as of late, particularly with citation and infobox maintenance. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 19:08, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this edit wasn't a good idea. First off, {{cite book}} supports having |year= separate from |date=. Typically, they'd be used separately when the date needs to be formatted in a different way to how it's displayed in short footnotes. True, in this particular case, that wasn't needed (the citation had two parameters only because I had originally formatted it for use in an article that uses the harv style). However, in these circumstances, the more precise value should have been left, and that's "c. 1979". Keeping the value "1979" is wrong as it implies the year is exact, when that's not in fact the case. – Uanfala (talk) 15:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: Ah. Sorry about that. I assumed the c. was for the approximate date, not the year. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:26, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Good job.... Maccore Henni Mii! Pictochat Mii! 20:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mac Henni: Oh, shiny! What's if for exactly, though? -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 20:52, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I read the rest of your talk page entries and there were some places where there were situations that you perfectly assumed good faith in admitting that your actions were in error. I admit, my original idea of the Civility Barnstar would have matched better. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Should I retry? Maccore Henni _{Mii! Pictochat Mii!} 23:46, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mac Henni: No, no, you're fine. Thank you! -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 19:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brainulator9

Category:Wikipedians who have assumed good faith

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sorry I rolled you back. I thought you were a bot. My mistake. I was preparing the way for reverting vandalism by an IP. -- Alarics (talk) 15:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alarics: You're fine, and thank you for fixing that; I didn't catch the vandalism. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 19:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary? fixes is not a helpful edit summary.

You removed the wikilinks from author's names, but didn't explain why.

You changed the dates, in the references, from yyyy-mm-dd to long form dates. Style guides recommend using long form dates in the body of articles. Style guides recommend against using yyyy-mm-dd - except where brevity is an advantage (paraphrasing from memory). Style guides explicitly say the use of yyyy-mm-dd in tables, AND REFERENCES, is encouraged. You didn't explain why you felt it was necessary to ignore the style guide's advice. Geo Swan (talk) 19:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Geo Swan:

• Author wikilinks are handled in separate parameters. The links are still there, just in |author-link= (or its aliases).
• The template {{Use mdy dates}} (and {{Use dmy dates}}, for that matter) both force all dates to that format. You can change it back if you want using the |cs1-dates= parameter in those two templates. Personally speaking, though, moving everything to that format helps me use AutoWikiBrowser to determine compliance with said tags. Plus, I just find the long dates more readable.

-BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 19:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Excuse me? Isn't the authorlink field only supposed to be used when someone thinks it is a good idea to put the author's name in surname, given name format, in the author field? Filling both an author and authorlink field, with the author's name, in given name surname order, is an unnecessary trigger for confusion, is redundant. I have never seen any other contributor write references this way, and I encourage you to stop doing so.

  As I noted elsewhere, there are strong reasons to hold back from introducing changes for purely esthetic reasons. Every time you make a change you introduce the possibility that you will introduce an error. Over and above the possibility of introducing errors, it is misleading. Unlike in the golden age of the wikipedia, almost none of the edits contributors make to articles today are to actual intellectual content. Too small a fraction of today's contributions are made to keep the wikipedia's content - what we tell our readers - accurate and up to date. When you make unnecessary changes you add to the burden of the small number of contributors who are working to keep the wikipedia up to date. When they return to an article they edited months or years ago, and perform a diff to see whether some new development has been included in the article's actual content, what they typically find is that enormous changes have been made to the article. What they typically find is that it takes them a long time to confirm that all, or almost all, of the edits since their last visit were to the article's meta-data, or were, frankly, trivial. Please don't add to this burden by making unnecessary changes for purely esthetic reasons.

• If you use automated tools that are not full policy compliant, then the solution is to stop from blindly authorizing them to follow every change they suggest, and apply human judgement when applying them, over-riding them when necessary. You should not be unnecessarily rewriting yyyy-mm-dd format dates, when they are in references (or tables) as yyyy-mm-dd format dates are explicitly allowed within references. You have the option of complaining to the authors of these tools. Geo Swan (talk) 16:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I repaired the archive-url on Robert Jordan that you flagged as failing verification. Just a tip on archive URLs, I've found that if I go back in the wayback machine to a date close to the original URL access date, I can usually find the correct content that an article used as a source. Thanks for flagging it, though, the archive-url that was in place before was no good! Schazjmd (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Schazjmd: Oh, okay, thanks and you're welcome! -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 18:29, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a very well accepted maintenance principle, in engineering, and other technical disciplines... "if it is not broke, don't 'fix' it".

I think you lapsed from it, in this edit.

We have complicated guideline and manuals of style. Overlapping wikidocuments address date formats. On the strength of those wikidocuments some contributors routinely re-write dates. These wikidocuments do, generally, discourage the use of dates in the yyyy-mm-dd format, and there are contributors who routinely re-write those into monthname, dd, yyyy format, everywhere they find them. In doing so they overlook that the wikidocuments in question explicitly say yyyy-mm-dd format is acceptable in contexts where brevity is important, and explicitly names tables and the body of references as instances where yyyy-mm-dd format is acceptable.

So, I am puzzled as to why you rewrote dates, in references, into your preferred format, in this edit.

I am puzzled as to why you would unwrap the [[]] around wikilinks, in references, adding an authorlink field, instead.

Are you familiar with the well accepted maintenance principle of "if it is not broke, don't 'fix' it"?

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 18:40, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time you've gone to me about this. I explained my reasons above. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 21:55, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brainulator9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of exterior wall assembly fires".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To anyone who can assist: Sorry to be a newbie. My question: On this page (ECAMI) there is a URL in the introduction that needs updating. However, there is no [edit] link from that section on this page (or any other page, it seems). So, how does an update get made? Thanks, Roger

Are you hungry? Isthisarandomaccountwellyes (talk) 12:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brainulator9, FYI, when a relevant article is created, a bot will sweep through within a few hours and make edits this one that you made: [1]. Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 01:35, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only realized that after the fact... oh, well. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:37, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 October 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Johnny Nash, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 04:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

since when has Patty SMYTHE been married to John McEnroe? Last I knew; it was Patty SMITH

I was not the person who put that there. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 01:35, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brainulator9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of exterior wall assembly fires".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—100% renewable energy—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 15:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brainulator9. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jotaro Kujo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jotaro Kujo. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 02:09, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for picking up on this ancient error You are probably right that the book was originally published in 1989 and I made a mistake. I am sorry - I cannot check this, or where the quote came from now. as the book has been packed into a box somewhere and I am now bedridden. Please make corrections as you see fit. All my very best wishes, John Hill (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:User-created public domain files (no Commons) from September 2007 has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Brainulator9. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jotaro Kujo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have previously edited Cardiff Arms Park. An editor has decided to split the article (yet again). I would like to know your view on the new edit....see Talk:Cardiff_Arms_Park#Article_Split_(again). SethWhales ^talk 20:17, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you enjoy the stroopwafels. Happy fourteenth WikiBirthday!!! ;3 ​-Keagen J. Cole ​🐾 (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Keagen J. Cole: Oh, wow, thanks! -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 19:46, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, @Brainulator9. ​-Keagen J. Cole ​🐾 (talk) 21:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I opened a discussion on Britney Spears talk page regarding her divorce finalization from Sam Asghari, if you have time please respond there. Thank you! Pillowdelight (talk) 07:04, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]