Next time you undo vandalism, please note the vandalism in the description. Bryan Krippner (talk) 19:30, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you incorrectly undoing my edits? I am factually correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.151.150.25 (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, It was a mistake. Keep editing! Borhan (talk) 16:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Come talk about the revert, thanks. 70.187.141.56 (talk) 21:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Borhan, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted Draft:Emelyn towns paul aldersong, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 20:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - Because the text on the page was understandable, WP:G1 does not apply. I deleted the page under WP:G3 instead as pure vandalism. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 20:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ThadeusOfNazereth I will be more careful when tagging pages in the future. Thank you. Borhan (talk) 20:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You changed the information that was true and i see that you have particular hate toward a country so let me just tell you if you think your wrong edit on wiki can change things in real life then thats not gona happen . 2409:408A:2D15:8BC8:B474:68E6:6775:32E2 (talk) 03:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit on Floptical was a broken link. I didn't mean to break Wikipedia. I just don't know how to handle references. You all just need to hurry up and fix broken links. 216.145.66.233 (talk) 06:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Borhan, I recently noticed some vandalism on the paracetamol page. I believe I have fixed it, however when I went to look at the talk page of the IP vandalising (92.207.184.242), I found you had already warned them and they had just had a previous editing block expire. I’m a fairly novice Wikipedia editor, and unlikely to be able to stick around as this progresses. As such, if you would be willing to take up the mantle of deciding if this is worthy of another request for an editing block, and if so submitting such a block request, or otherwise keeping an eye on that IP, it would be greatly appreciated. Buzzerbian (talk) 15:53, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi there, I saw you reverted my edit on Natty Dread - could you please explain why? as far as I can tell my edit was justified; the link on the page is incorrect, given that the mentioned song's lyrics refer to intercourse rather than biological sex (which is what it currently links to). granted it probably looks suspicious for an IP to be changing links to go to sex-related pages but if there's some other reason i'd like to know, thank you! 77.175.182.147 (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Borhan! I see you around often reverting vandalism and unconstructive editing, which I appreciate. However, I think you incorrectly reverted an IP editor's removal of content on the above article. The text they removed had no source, no clear relation to the article, and was in my opinion far beyond credibility. I just wanted to let you know why I reverted you, since I don't usually see you make mistakes. Thank you! Quid Est Squid (talk) 19:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]