Disappearance of Joshua Guimond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 08:00, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. With this note I'd like to ask that you please not tag so many of your edits as "minor edits." As noted on this page, WP:HEP — "A check to the 'minor edit' box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the version with your edit and the previous version: typo/grammar corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearranging of text without modifying content, etc. A minor edit is a version that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute." This page has further information that may be useful WP:MINOR Thank you.FFM784 (talk) 14:49, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. Sorry about that. Atubofsilverware 18:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Atubofsilverware. Thank you for your work on Ocean National Bank robbery. Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 20:34, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Herpetogenesis: Thank you! Atubofsilverware 1:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Atubofsilverware. Thank you for your work on Asakura Toshikage. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Pitchfork (website), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 05:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adakiko: It was a mistake, sorry. I only meant to add the link to Liz Phair's song "Fuck and Run". Atubofsilverware (talk) 05:14, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to pop by and say congratulations on having your article on Josh Guimond's disappearance published! I attempted to create and have an article on the topic published in the past, but was unsuccessful in doing so (as can be seen on my page). Please, feel free to pop in and ask, should you need any help or contributions to the page! DylanJ10000 (talk) 02:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. I didn't know that page had such a history haha. I'll let you know if I need anything Atubofsilverware (talk) 03:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paraquat murders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami into History of Tokyo. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:32, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks for letting me know. Atubofsilverware (talk) 00:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was just working on one of your articles, Battle of Namacurra! Just to let you know I fixed up the Infobox and added more information, but I recommend you look at the text of the article, as I noticed some small mistakes in grammar and other things. Have a good day! Antny08 (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the additions. I fixed all the grammar mistakes I could find. Good day to you too Atubofsilverware (talk) 02:19, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of Tokyo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minato.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. For your future reference regarding image size, note the bolded sentence at WP:IMGSIZE:

Except with very good reason, do not use px (e.g. |thumb|300px, which forces a fixed image width measured in pixels, disregarding the user's image size preference setting.

Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 04:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Atubofsilverware (talk) 08:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Guimond computer photos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Gary Ridgway has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 00:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be an issue with a blurb from an article that I incorporated into the text. I thought I rephrased the text appropriately, but I'll go further next time. Atubofsilverware (talk) 23:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of the United States, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic title error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Civility Barnstar
		{{{1}}}

). for helping to make the GT page better with me =) Shane O'Sullivan the 1 (talk) 17:25, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Atubofsilverware can you get ride cite 11 and 12 for the lead they both say.

Cite error: The named reference :16 was invoked but never defined (see the help page). Cite error: The named reference :17 was invoked but never defined (see the help page). undo Tag: Twinkle Shane O'Sullivan the 1 (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The postal address of the venue says it's in Butler, but the US Postal Service doesn't issue city names according to municipal boundaries (this page states: " The U.S. Postal Service establishes ZIP codes and mailing addresses in order to maximize the efficiency of their system, not to recognize jurisdictional boundaries."). Butler is to the east of the venue.

This local source says it's in Connoquenessing Township. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That source does not say that on my end. Atubofsilverware (talk) 04:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This version stated: "The rally is happening at the Butler Farm Show Grounds on Evans City Road in Connoquenessing Township." which is what I saw WhisperToMe (talk) 04:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do see the mention in that version, but the article was since updated as per the website. They likely changed the location. Atubofsilverware (talk) 04:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Butler Farm Show Grounds is the same place, and it's not possible for the venue to move to the east into Butler. The news station was catering to a local audience when it announced the specific township. Distance of the fairgrounds to Butler and Outline of Butler proper. The text was in the "original story" announcing the event that was going to happen, and the news station decided the text wasnt necessary anymore. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See "Verifiability, not truth" at WP:TRUTH. Unless you have an up-to-date article explicitly stating it is anything other than Butler, do not change it. I am not against a more accurate location being added but Google Maps is not a reliable source here. Atubofsilverware (talk) 04:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The consideration is why the news article was updated. The update was not because the location was erroneous, nor because there was a change of location. I feel the text is still valid even if the news station later removed it, because the reason for the text being removed does not impact the validity of the text. Having said that I'm sure some other local source has another article giving the township location, so I'm looking for that.

Also news stations and newspapers (especially ones not "local") often rely on USPS city names, which means they don't always use accurate locations. I have used maps to show actual locations : See: Talk:ENSCO,_Inc. as precedent

When I actually cite locations I use U.S. Census Bureau documents and/or officially published city maps. The Google Maps stuff was just to show you that the place just is not in Butler no matter what newspapers say (and this is verifiable!)

WhisperToMe (talk) 04:56, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I still disagree with "the reason for the text being removed does not impact the validity of the text" as per WP:TRUTH. I suppose you can find a news article about the Butler Farm Show Grounds itself that mentions the township. Atubofsilverware (talk) 05:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm finding the Butler Eagle cited (from Google results) the specific township, but it's throwing up paywalls when I try to read the full article. Lemme see if I can find a way of getting the full article, and then I'll cite a Butler Eagle article (local newspapers tend to get specific locations) WhisperToMe (talk) 05:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Try a paywall-removing extension or website. Atubofsilverware (talk) 05:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you do find a workable version of that article in question, change it back to "Connoquenessing, west of Butler" in the lead, because the front page of Wikipedia currently says the shooting took place in Butler, and it would be confusing for readers to see a different location once they click it. Atubofsilverware (talk) 05:11, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I used 12ft.io and from this article I got the phrase "The rally is scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. at the Butler Farm Show grounds, 625 Evans City Road in Connoquenessing Township." (and the article is still up with the same text) so hopefully that should resolve things! I'm happy to use "Connoquenessing Township, west of Butler" in the lead because news articles often associate the location with Butler city (even though it's not really there). WhisperToMe (talk) 05:13, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, add it to the lead and background sections Atubofsilverware (talk) 05:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 07:07, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I agree, more than disease. So hard to keep changes short enough for the lead and still summarize accurately. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 03:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC) —[reply]

yea. thanks for the help on the page. Atubofsilverware (talk) 03:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You edited the first section to be called "Giorgos Spyrou companies" - can you explain what this means or represents? I've reverted it temporarily. NotDragonius (talk) 03:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't me that was 213.133.91.223 in the edit before me lol. I didn't notice that heading change and I was just trying to add the link to Izze (drink) which I recently created. Atubofsilverware (talk) 05:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, my bad then, sorry about that NotDragonius (talk) 16:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Atubofsilverware (talk) 17:35, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shelley Lenz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shelley Lenz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Muboshgu (talk) 19:15, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disappearance of Joshua Guimond you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Disappearance of Joshua Guimond you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Disappearance of Joshua Guimond and Talk:Disappearance of Joshua Guimond/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 01:06, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Disappearance of Joshua Guimond you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Disappearance of Joshua Guimond for comments about the article, and Talk:Disappearance of Joshua Guimond/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks for the review :) Atubofsilverware (talk) 02:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Atubofsilverware. Thank you for your work on Korean Demilitarized Zone loudspeakers. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work on your new article. Note that it would benefit from being added to appropriate Wikiprojects.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:58, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my bad. Will do Atubofsilverware (talk) 22:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on General Atomics MQ-9 Reaper. Thank you. I13A32 (talk) 18:05, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I saw was an account with four recent edits, two I did not understand:

1. Fayez Banihammad is a page that deals with American matters, so it would use American English

2. on the MQ-9 Reaper, two parentheses are supposed to be there on the end because the "(" before UAV needs to have a closing ")"

It looked like typical vandalism, so if you had just made a few mistakes, I apologize. Atubofsilverware (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]