Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Manimajra was renamed as sector 13 legally by UT government of Chandigarh in January 2020 and by February 2020 the new name was finally declared to be written everywhere on papers. Below are links to the decision:- 1). https://m.timesofindia.com/city/chandigarh/manimajra-to-be-renamed-sector-13-residents-elated/amp_articleshow/73114749.cms .

2). https://www.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/chandigarh-s-manimajra-is-now-sector-13/story-ploFPCA4UGpDu9ksUxLtdL.html

Being a Indian resident, i would like to contribute to this new law which was passed by our government .

It is true that the proposal had been initially opposed in december 2019. In the initial proposal, names like Sector M or Sector 26 east were proposed. Here is the link for initial proposals made :-

3)https://m.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/manimajra-rwa-wants-number-not-m-after-sector/story-Q7ZPsdh5y120cEqlVAKuhP_amp.html

4)https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-chandigarh-to-finally-get-sector-13-after-54-years-of-formation-2813378

 (these articles were published in newspapers in 2019 which is old).

5)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/chandigarh/mani-majra-to-be-sector-m-863728 (This link i provided over here was published in Tribune India in November 2019 )

But soon the final decision was made which overruled the previous proposals and finally the new name for manimajra was concluded as sector 13 by the beginning of 2020. The next link (6th Link) was also published in Tribune India with the final decision which was declared in February 2020 :-

6)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/its-official-mani-majra-is-sector-13-of-chandigarh-39042

Please help me by putting your vote in the panel discussion on the talk page section of Sector 13.

Here is an example on how to put your vote ___________.

• Support
• Strong Support
• Agreed

Click on the edit tab and please copy any 1 vote you want to put from the above or you can put you vote by putting a * star symbol followed by 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' and then writing your word for vote like support, agreed etc and finally closing it with again 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' in the end. Taal Saptak (talk) 04:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anupam! I see that you recently made an edit on Hindustani. I'd recommend you to go through Talk:Hindustani language#topic of article where I and another user:Austronesier have discussed how important it is to mention the "context" when describing Hindustani which has been used in multiple senses.

So the earlier version where I had mentioned : "In modern context, Hindustani refers to the colloquial base of Hindi and Urdu" no longer exists. Since, you have made the edits. I'd like to inform that it would be better if the older version (of above mentioned line) is restored as it mentions the "context" which is highly vital to being accurate in the concerned article (see the talk page).

From Sattvic7 (talk) 17:58, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, now I think my original idea was half-baked. I'm not asking you to change your support for it though.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 03:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, there are no hard feelings over the move. I intend to edit the article to explain some Lutherans' issues with the term.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 05:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kalash people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mahadev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anupam. Is this sentence in the Kho people article:- The Kho people are likely descendants of those who arrived in the region during the Indo-Aryan migration properly sourced? Since all I can view is a bunch of snippets [1]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:48, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits on Spiritual practice.

It might be helpful in the future if you edit a section, then try the "Show Preview" button, then continuing editing until you are satisfied, and only then save it. This will appear as a single edit in the edit history instead of a long chain of edits -- which makes the history easier to follow.

This is just a suggestion; if there are reasons to make a series of separate edits, you are certainly entitled to do so. Regards -- Clean Copy^talk 15:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from British Raj into Protestantism in India. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 11:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evangelical theology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Birth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anupam, categorisation can be seen at Category:Anglicanism. Linking to WikiProjects accordingly in categorised articles would probably be a good idea consequently. Please let me know if I can help you otherwise. PPEMES (talk) 08:46, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Islamic Barnstar
		Dear Anupam, I feel good to gift you The Islamic Barnstar award for your contributions to WP:Islam. More recently to Mohammad Najeeb Qasmi and Muhammad Taqi Amini. You are making a difference on the Wikipedia. Best. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 17:03, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have always appreciated your contributions for WP:ISLAM and WP:India. I am requesting you to copy-edit few of my articles like Yoda Press. Regards - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 23:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your useful edit to the article Immaculate Conception, and I hope you can understand why I made some edits to it. I do sincerely thank you though, because I was unable to find very much on the subject. You evidently know a lot about this, and I'm curious: what position does the Lutheran movement hold on the immaculate conception? Is it a "pious opinion"? Has it simply withered away? Achar Sva (talk) 09:02, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anupam, hoping that you are in best. Could you address the issue of copy edit in this article? Regards - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 09:07, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Allhallowtide has been nominated for merging with Template:Halloween. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 11:41, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, please check the discussion at the the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. As I'm sure you have probably noticed the Allhallowtide Template includes All Saints and All Souls as Main topics. Comparing the two templates, I think you will find that the Halloween Template (while containing some items that might better be under Allhallows) is very heavily oriented to pop culture, scary movies, tv episodes, costumes, etc. Given the different respective treatments, I do not see a real overlap, and therefore, think they should better remain separate, but a clearer distinction made between what belongs where. Cheers. Manannan67 (talk) 06:32, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Barn Stars, they really mean a lot to me and I feel the zeal of writing more because I know that my work is being noticed. Thanks a lot. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 08:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paschal Triduum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moravian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have sent me an alert about an email (perhaps with good advice for me), which I haven't received, although my address works for other messages. Best wishes, whether you are or are not one of the heroes on the front line. Bealtainemí (talk) 18:12, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Pakistan Barnstar of National Merit
		Great work on Pakistan and other South Asian topics! Your contributions to Wikipedia are really appreciated. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 09:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on aviation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cabo

Impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic on tourism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cabo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Anupam, i am ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist, please add that The Urdu is not a dialect of Western Hindi. It is true that the two languages ​​are very similar and their speakers understand each other perfectly, but it is a mistake to consider Urdu as a dialect of Hindi, because in the same way Hindi can be considered as a dialect of Urdu. They are two independent languages but, Registers of Hindustani (Hindustani can the dialect of Western Hindi, if it's exclude Urdu, it's not important if Parental language Hindustani, is dialect of Western Hindi, so child language Urdu, should bee), Hindi and Urdu, both were divided as freed languages, Urdu for Muslims, and Hindi for Hindus. ImMuslimandimnotaterrorist (talk) 12:51, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Elizium23 (talk) 18:20, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Composite nationalism, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mahatma Gandhi championed the concept of composite nationalism, which led to a massive expansion of the Indian independence movement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Composite nationalism. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Composite nationalism), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (Talk) 00:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I read your link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BOLD,_revert,_discuss_cycle - Fowler&fowler's reversal (with no consultation) of 6 months worth of edits from about 20 different users does not seem consistent with that guideline. I want to reinstate the changes Fowler&fowler rolled back as a matter of urgency. Firstly because i think a reversion that dramatic is destructive vandalism. And also so i can try to improve the most recent version so there is something optimal to discuss. Fowler&fowler repeated the reversion while i was working on the article, so the version immediately before that is not the best to discuss. Irtapil (talk) 05:58, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had left it a bit messy for a few days because i got interrupted, so the version immediately preceding the destructive edit is not the best to discuss. I want to try to improve what was there, but they did it again while i was in the process of working on the page. I know edit wars are very much frowned upon but i'm not sure what the right way to deal with this is. Irtapil (talk) 06:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anupam. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by: {{subst:WikiProject India/The 10,000 Challenge Invite|~~~~}} Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anupam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Financial wellness".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:04, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pashtuns; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Discuss in talk please.Casperti (talk) 21:11, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Barkeep49 (talk) 22:54, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anupam. I have partially written an article on Pathans in India. It is not entirely complete. Feel free to contribute to it if you ever have the time and good sources. Cheers, Mar4d (talk) 19:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Casperti (talk • contribs) 21:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, i dont know why i have been blocked from creating articles on wikipedia. please see into it and help. Thank you.--Jeromeenriquez (talk) 06:51, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Anglo-Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Christian

Mazhar Ali Azhar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article All India Conference of Indian Christians, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the All India Conference of Indian Christians was opposed to the partition of India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/All India Conference of Indian Christians. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, All India Conference of Indian Christians), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to earn Star . How to get that ?Ignostar (talk) 11:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article All India Anglo-Indian Association, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the All India Anglo-Indian Association maintains that Anglo-Indians are unique because they are Christians and have historical links to both Europe and India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/All India Anglo-Indian Association. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, All India Anglo-Indian Association), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:03, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your sweet contributions to 'pedia like this brownie! Just keep it up dear ;-) He@ven's Queent@lk 15:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kanye West 2020 presidential campaign shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 01:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ONUS. Self-revert and use the talk page. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 01:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your insinuation of this term into the Joe Biden article. It is UNDUE and it's not a term much used in the USA. I hope you are not thinking this tag should be applied to a wide range of American public figures. It's not a mainstream view that this label applies to American Politics or public discourse. SPECIFICO talk 18:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SPECIFICO talk 18:18, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

well i read some of your articles it was nice, KEEP IT UP. i having nothing to give but still i liked some of your articles (contribution).UMAGPR (talk) 16:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i will surely ask if i have any doubt, thank you so much for leaving a message in my talk page. i am just a new user, thank you.

thanks for your welcome cookie.😁👌 regards UMAGPR (talk) 18:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Peace Barnstar
		amazing. UMAGPR (talk) 06:58, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Direction of prayer at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 13:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me out to edit this User:UMAGPR/St.Mary's Church Gulmarg, Kashmir article to publish, I need your help to Edit, Insert and publish this article. regards UMAGPR (talk) 04:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Direction of prayer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 01:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I corrected this "eastward orientation" business in Fixed prayer times and didn't comment any more there. But I feel this article needs more work; it leaves out important Talmudic and rabbinic commentaries in favor of quoting popular online sources. We have many Jewish editors who work very hard on their articles; an article like this doesn't represent the religion well, especially on the main page. Yoninah (talk) 01:17, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. You really did a good job with the expansion; I'm impressed! Best, Yoninah (talk) 19:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you consider some of the recent issues like this one "contentious"? The "so he cannot win the presidential election" violates WP:SYNTH, since the source does not say that, but otherwise I'm not sure what the problem is with that edit. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fixed prayer times, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Christians belonging to the Oriental Orthodox Churches pray at seven fixed prayer times? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fixed prayer times. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fixed prayer times), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i see that you mentioned W28394 here [[2]] due to his disruptive editing. He clearly hasn't learnt anything as he did revert the changes again here [[3]]. I have mentioned him here [[4]] as he is doing the same for the following two articles. Jalal-ud-din Khalji and Khalji dynasty Kami2018 (talk) 18:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi sir, i have reverted the change to one of the article which this user was reverting without providing any evidence. I have opened up a discussion on the talk page for [[5]]. Please feel free to contribute as i am sure this user will revert this change either today or tomorrow and i cant seem to get attention from the moderators.Kami2018 (talk) 04:16, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, Good afternoon, I have noticed your hard work on creating the Shehimo breviary page which inspired me to create a page for the LRD ministry team and list all current publications, future projects and etc. I kindly request you to help me in writing this article page and pull together any personal assets or resources so that this page will be approved and help others find valuable information on the Indian Orthodox Prayers.

Sincerely yours, Zmalluzboyz (talk) 16:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ministry_of_Liturgical_Resource_Development

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bettani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhatti.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Evening, unfortunately, I have to write on your talk page due to the petty targeting, complaining, and accusations initiated against me by Kami2018.

I have been accused of edit wars, disruptive editing, etc, for making factual and well sourced changes to articles. I have provided all required sources for every change I have made. You can find the reasoning and sources for them on the talk pages here [[6]],here [[7]] and here, [[8]].

Rather than engaging and replying on the talk pages, Kami2018 has resorted to flippant behavior and is trying to get me banned by various editors/moderators. Kami2018 has been obtrusively imposing his views on to others and has been warned against doing so by various users numerous times in the past as well. I will not be engaging with him any further as he has time and again showed he is not one to be reasoned with. Thank you.

W28394 (talk) 18:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time out to reply. Regarding consensus on the Hindkowan article, I would like to mention a couple of things before I get to whether it needs to be reverted to the previous version.

1) I had first edited that article on the 8th of March. For 5 whole months, nobody had a major problem with the edits on the article.

2) On 7th of August, I edited the Khalji article, which Kami2018 had already edited before.

3) On 9th of August, Kami2018 reverted my edits on the Khalji article.

4) On 10th of August, Kami2018 reverted my edits on the Hindkowan article, keep in mind he had nothing to do with that article prior to me editing the Khalji article. This only leads one to believe that me editing the Khalji article he was maintaining did not sit well with him for which he reverted the only page I had a big hand in editing.

5) Ever since, he has been senselessly accusing me of vandalism and edit wars when to be honest, the timeline of edit histories say otherwise. Rather than engaging on the talkpage and answering/countering genuine facts and reasoning, he has been trying to get me banned from wiki. Which I believe is petty and childlike and will amount to nothing more than this back and forth exchange.

Having said that, lets move on to the Hindkowan article and the changes I made to it.

1) I removed sources stating that "Other Hindko-speakers, mostly of the Hindu and Sikh faiths, have been living in Afghanistan for centuries and are known as Hindki". This is because it was not mentioned in the source provided.

2) I removed the Punjabi language tags and the Punjabi fonts because beginning with the 1981 census, speakers of Saraiki and Hindko were no longer included in the total numbers for Punjabis. Pakistan is where perhaps over 99% of the Hindkowans live and they have been classified as a distinct group of people, independent of the Punjabis and thus the Punjabi language font and tags are not required in this article. Once again, all this is well sourced information.

3) I had to remove a bunch of sources from the article, mostly because they dated from the British Raj era. The issue of whether of not such sources are reliable Wikipedia:RS has been tested time and again at all sorts of venues, including Wikipedia:RSN. The consensus has for many years been that they are not and, as such, we should not use them.

4) I had to remove countries from "regions with significant population" as the Hindkowan population in those countries was quite clearly, not 'significant' enough and amounting to only a couple hundred people (compared to 5 million in Pakistab).

4) Other than removing the above mentioned contents of the page, I also added more information to the article. All of this was well sourced and well structured.

5) Due to this, the page remained relatively inactive edit wise for 5 months before Kami2018 reverted everything, and took the article back to its out of date, poorly sourced, poorly structured version.

According to wiki, "Any edit that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have consensus." As mentioned above, my edits were pretty much unchanged for 5 months and thus we can assume that it by and large had the consensus of editors who came across it from March 8 to August 10 (when the user mentioned above reverted all my edits for reasons I am pretty sure we know)

Therefore, I think it goes against common sense reverting from a well sourced well structured article to a poorly sourced poorly structured article. A consensus should not be required and would have been required if the article was an essay based on opinions and not when it is an article about a demography backed with well sourced facts. As wiki says, " Instead of following every rule, it is acceptable to use common sense as you go about editing. Being too wrapped up in rules can cause loss of perspective, so there are times when it is better to ignore a rule. Even if a contribution "violates" the precise wording of a rule, it might still be a good contribution. Common sense doesn't need to be a policy; as a fundamental principle, it is above any policy."

W28394 (talk) 22:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Anupam, W28394 has again started behaving in the same manner as he was acting before. He is just pushing his propaganda on pages below and i would like to bring this to your notice. Changes reverted [[9]] [[10]] [[11]] Kami2018 (talk) 01:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kami2018, Kindly go through the talk page of the article and see that we have already discussed the changes made over a month ago and agreed to them. W28394 (talk) 14:25, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Dear Sir, Many thanks for your kind words and barnstar gifts towards me. Here is a token of my appreciation towards you and your work here. Sincerely yours, Zmalluzboyz (talk) 05:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think the user kami is wrong (both on contributes and consensus). First the "majority" of users in Khalji talk page have consensus, and that's for the edits. (You can see it for yourself). Secondly the user w28394 have merely fixed the loop holes (which were obvious) on the article. I think as a positive contributor you should do the right thing and back him up. (At least on khalji page), Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:799:5E0:6000:9C:2AFE:FC36:AD3F (talk) 13:59, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly my point 2A01:799:5E0:6000:9C:2AFE:FC36:AD3F. Why are my edits being reverted to a poorly sourced version on the Hindkowan article over lack of consensus whereas no such action is being taken on the Khalji Dynasty article? Various editors dispute Kami2018s edits on the Khalji Dynasty article. Editors 84.211.3.220, Hayras123, Khestwol, Akmal94, FawadAliKhan11 are only some users who have not given consensus on that article yet Kami2018 has been editing the page and POV pushing the article without any repercussions.

W28394 (talk) 23:58, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tobacco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Book of Discipline.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on the talk page of the article and shall wait for the counter argument against my edits. I shall revert it if nobody replies to the discussion. In the mean time, I would like to discuss the fact that while my edits are being reverted to a poorly sourced version on the Hindkowan article over lack of consensus, no such action is being taken on the Khalji Dynasty article. Various editors dispute Kami2018s edits on the Khalji Dynasty article. Editors .Hayras123, Khestwol, Akmal94, FawadAliKhan11. 84.211.3.220, 2A01:799:5E0:6000:9C:2AFE:FC36:AD3F are only some users who have not given consensus on that article yet Kami2018 has been editing the page and POV pushing the article without any repercussions.

W28394 (talk) 00:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Anupam Clearly W28394 is not stopping from reverting articles and it is clear from his reverts here [[12]]. I have restored the version as supported by the talk page. Kami2018 (talk) 04:51, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The others on the talk page have been discussing the same issues I have been discussing. I have not received a reply on the talk page countering the edits by Kami2018. I believe you are saying that when you tag multiple users its not canvassing but when I do it is considered canvassing for some odd reason. That is interesting to say the least. I believe you adhere to the warning as well since you initiated it.

W28394 (talk) 00:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had only tagged individuals who have contributed to the Khalji Dynasty article. You can confirm through the talk page. W28394 (talk) 04:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Direction of prayer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jewish homes in the Diaspora often feature a mizrah wall hanging (example pictured) to indicate the direction of prayer towards Jerusalem? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Direction of prayer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Direction of prayer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen this edit. This guy looks like a POV pusher to me. He recently removed the mention of Hinduism from this article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:28, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Wesleyan theology

added links pointing to Evening Prayer and Morning Prayer

Kashmiri language

added a link pointing to Persian

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Pakistan Star
		Great work on Pakistan related articles! You do fantastic work. Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 23:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ecumenism

added a link pointing to Mennonite Church

World Council of Churches

added a link pointing to Mennonite Church

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Connected contributor (paid) has been nominated for merging with Template:Paid article. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:18, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Syed Moiz Balkhi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Moiz Balkhi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 00:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mennonite Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Thanks for maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. You are owed a million thanks! Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 16:30, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks again for your help on South Asian languages. Owe you big. Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 03:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Abraham shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Having had your suggested edit reverted twice, your next step is to go to the Talk page and explain why you feel the changes you wish to introduce would improve the article. Achar Sva (talk) 21:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hindu Raj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cavendish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I received an e-mail message from you, asking me if I mind that you send me some information. I don't mind, but be sure to only send me information that is personal or otherwise sensitive. If it is not sensitive or personal, you can send it here. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy Diwali!!!
		Sky full of fireworks, Mouth full of sweets, Home full of lamps, And festival full of sweet memories... Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply] Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Christianity in Bihar

added a link pointing to Capuchin

Christianity in India

added a link pointing to Capuchin

Newar people

added a link pointing to Capuchin

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you explain why you changed multiple redirects for the Valmiki caste to redirect to Chuhra? A lot of castes in India are known as Valmiki/Balmiki not limited to the Chuhra of Punjab. Your redirect changes are not only confusing/compounding the two but also likely created misdirects. I will be reverting these edits unless you have something significant to add. Gotitbro (talk) 01:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anupam, this book has a nice section on Sindh which I think you might enjoy looking at:

• Hasan, Mushirul (2008), Towards Freedom: Documents on the Movement for Independence in India 1939, Part I, Indian Council of Historical Research/Oxford University Press

Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 02:42, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superstitions in Muslim societies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superstitions in Muslim societies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bookku (talk) 05:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Islamic Barnstar
		Great work on Islam related articles. You did excellent work on Deobandi related articles. Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 05:16, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bettiah Christians, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the lehenga was the traditional dress of women belonging to the Bettiah Christian ethnoreligious community of India? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bettiah Christians. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bettiah Christians), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Hinduism Award
		You are the rare one that people have always imagined about. I saw your edits and page creations and I must say I am really impressed especially with Jwala Ji Temple creation. Keep up your Wikipedia passion on Hinduism articles! LearnIndology (talk) 18:24, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for protecting this project! Greatly appreciated. Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 00:01, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of John Montgomery Cooper at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:07, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Anupam, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Merry Christmas and Happy New year

Hello! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous 2021 on the behalf of Christmas task force of WikiProject Holidays.

Happy holidays! Wishing you a joyful Christmas and a happy New year. We would like to use this occasion for giving thanks for editors like you for your works on editing, maintaining and expanding this encyclopedia. May the glorious message of peace and love fill you with joy during this wonderful season. You can do! Improve and assess the articles listed in Category:Christmas and its subpages. (list of categories) Feel free to add christmas=yes to the Wikiproject banners {{WikiProject Holidays}} or {{WikiProject Christianity}} in the articles related to Christmas. This will help to automatically place it into Category:Christmas task force articles. Tag articles under the scope of our project. Recruit interested editors to the project. Collect categories, resource links, and templates. Feel free to develop missing articles related to this topic - some of them can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Holidays/Christmas task force/Reference sources articles list. Bring former featured articles and good articles back to their status. Visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Holidays/Christmas task force/Article alerts page for recent changes on project. Feel free to participate in the process of revival of task force.

Recent... Featured article Trading Places- a 1983 American comedy film directed by John Landis and written by Timothy Harris and Herschel Weingrod. Featured article candidate Die Hard-a 1988 American action film directed by John McTiernan and written by Jeb Stuart and Steven E. de Souza. Good Article Home Alone-a 1990 American Christmas family comedy film directed by Chris Columbus. DYK One Voice at Christmas-a 2016 Christmas album by the Welsh singer Aled Jones and produced by Classic FM.

---

"Christmas is not a time nor a season, but a state of mind. To cherish peace and goodwill, to be plenteous in mercy, is to have the real spirit of Christmas!"

-Calvin Coolidge

Quotations related to Calvin Coolidge at Wikiquote

---

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Questions
• Unsubscribe (WikiProject Holidays)
• Unsubscribe (WikiProject Christianity)

---

Sent by Path slopu (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Holidays, WikiProject Christianity and their related projects. © Copyleft 2020

• Wikiproject Holidays
• WikiProject Christianity
• Christmas task force

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:18, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Torwali people at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 19:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I would appreciate it if you stopped edit warring at Malakand District‎ and History of Malakand. First, predatory journals should not be used – I don't think this would ever be negotiable. Second, it's not up to me to gain consensus for removing unsourced text; the WP:BURDEN is no you to provide sources for this text. Thanks. – Uanfala (talk) 00:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from User talk:Uanfala

Greetings User:Uanfala, actually the articles you mention included the information prior to me even touching them. I simply improved the sourcing and now have even supplanted the reference you found to be inadequate. Per WP:BRD, it is now up to you to gain consensus for the removal of the reliably sourced information. I will continue to revert you if you edit war against the status-quo version. I hope this helps. With regards, Anupam^Talk 00:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Anupam, a lot of the content was there before you came along. But it was entirely unsourced. Your "improvement" [13] consisted in adding references to a source – academicjournals.org/journal/JLC/article-full-text/CBBA2D553114 – that was on the spam blacklist. I don't know how you might have failed to notice that. And at least some of that content, like the story of Mahmud's invasion of Swat, has been characterised as legendary by an actually reliable source, and one that you've ostensibly cited elsewhere (that's Scerrato's paper mentioned at Talk:Torwali people). – Uanfala (talk) 00:56, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to your question: I found that article from your contribs. I haven't look at any other articles there. – Uanfala (talk) 23:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I believe that a substantial chunk of your contributed content may need to be examined (though I don't want to get involved in any of that). I've recently had the chance to look at the content you've contributed to two articles – as you're aware, I've commented at Template:Did you know nominations/Torwali people and at Talk:Din-i Ilahi#Akbar's respect for Jesus. In both cases there are serious failures of WP:RS and WP:OR. These are basic principles of Wikipedia; we may see newbies who break them, but it's extremely disappointing to have an experienced and productive editor disregarding them so often.
You should correct me if I'm wrong, but your approach to article writing seems to involve going on Google Books, typing a search phrase and then writing up what you see in the snippets and previews on the first page of results. Searching like that can be useful for identifying potentially relevant sources, it can even work when you're combing for simple facts (like birth years of people, or altitudes of mountains), but that's no way to write articles. Get the books and papers and read them. Use a library. Ask for specific resources at the resource exchange. That way, it will take a lot longer, yes – but the results will be better. – Uanfala (talk) 23:16, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion has continued at User talk:Uanfala#Re:Edit warring and sources. – Uanfala (talk) 00:59, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! Wishing you and your family a wonderful Xmas! Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 17:04, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Great work on creating the article on Torwali people. I learned so much about my region. Thank you! Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 00:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You recently added some information to Hindu Raj, including The Hindu Raj mountain range runs between Chitral and Gilgit; they are located south of the Cavendish. Cavendish links to a disambiguation page, and none of the entries on that page have anything to do with Pakistan or the wider region. Neither can I find anything online. What is 'the Cavendish'? Lennart97 (talk) 00:20, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		The Buddhism Barnstar
		You are without any doubt the rare one. Saw your edits related to Buddhism, and I must say, you publish quality content, such as Shanti Stupa. I am looking forward to collaborate with you on topics related to Buddhism. :) LearnIndology (talk) 15:44, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 20:50, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Anupam reported by User:Kautilya3 (Result: ). Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 01:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amy Jackson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shanti Stupa, Delhi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Shanti Stupa, Delhi, was inaugurated by the Dalai Lama in 2007? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shanti Stupa, Delhi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shanti Stupa, Delhi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Montgomery Cooper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Montgomery Cooper advanced the theory that both South American and North American Indians were "marginal peoples" who were cultural relics from prehistoric times? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Montgomery Cooper. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Montgomery Cooper), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Today you reverted this change: [14] Do you have a reason for this reversion? No consensus is required for a change like this, particularly if you provide no reason for your objection. :bloodofox: (talk) 03:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Feast of Christ the King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Reformed Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anupam,

Wanted to notify you that you are part of this dispute resolution in this noticeboard:

[15]

--Casperti (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear- we at the DRN are not admins. I removed that word from the subject line to clarify. We are volunteer only. Nightenbelle (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Great work in cleaning up all those articles. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 02:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flame (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church History.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on changing the word "Gandhara" to "East Afghanistan" in reference to Pashtun history in the Pre-Islamic Period [16]

I hope you can contribute to this with your insights PashtoPromoter (talk) 07:22, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Old Catholic Church

added a link pointing to Great Schism

Union of Utrecht (Old Catholic)

added a link pointing to Great Schism

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for what you said on Yoninah's talk, - see also Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2021-03-28/Obituary! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

direction of prayer

Thank you for quality articles around spirituality in India and Pakistan, such as Composite nationalism, All India Conference of Indian Christians and Direction of prayer, for fighting vandalism, for promoting cure by peace and kindness, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2566 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Psalms: I am not convinced that splitting Protestant in Lutheran and Nonconformist is a good idea, - could we please discuss that? First we just said Jewish, Catholic and Protestant. Then came someone saying Anglican needs extra, can't be taken as part of Protestant. Now you try another split, but what then about Reformed, United, etc.?? - If usage is different for a certain Protestant group, that could be mentioned in the body, but the sentence in the lead is rather meant as emphasis for a quite broad ecumenical aspect. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thank you for all the editing you have done on Covenant Renewal Service. However, one point that you have added has me puzzled: the claim that Covenant Renewal is held at watchnight services. I have never encountered any report of that being done. Can you give more information, please, e.g. where and when this has happened? So far as I can discover, Covenant and Watchnight traditions are entirely independent. Thanks. seglea (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your speedy reply. After I'd left the message above it occurred to me to try the UMC site, and I found the article you cite. It's odd that tradition developed in the UMC, because so far as I know (and I've checked with some historians) it has never been so in British or British-derived Methodism, where the tradition of holding Covenant services is much stronger - they are almost always on the first Sunday of the year. Watchnight services are now virtually extinct in the UK anyway, but even when they were common they were never that I know of linked with Covenant - though it might have happened in some parts of the country, or in some of the non-Wesleyan Methodist churches that existed before British Methodist union in 1933. I will adjust the page to make it clear that there are geographic differences here. seglea (talk) 19:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tolga Tanriseven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tolga Tanriseven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

- CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 11:38, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	You have certainly earned my respect by your recent activities on Wikipedia. Tolerance and coexistence are the messages I am picking up from you. Your participation is much appreciated! Ngrewal1 (talk) 14:51, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Old Order River Brethren

added a link pointing to Mennonite Church

United Zion Church

added a link pointing to Mennonite Church

Wesleyan theology

added a link pointing to Independent Methodist

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Old Order River Brethren

added a link pointing to Mennonite Church

United Zion Church

added a link pointing to Mennonite Church

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anupam

Your move

19:19, 25 May 2021‎ Anupam talk contribs block‎  102 bytes +102‎  Anupam moved page Caste system among Christians to Caste system among South Asian Christians 

seems to me to be out of process. I suggest you revert it immediately. If the move is to be contested it should go to move review. Andrewa (talk) 20:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Caste system among South Asian Christians#Issue with the above for discussion of this, which seems to me to belong here not there.

Just to repeat and clarify, there was no justification for this bold reverting of a closed and actioned move. If you think you lack the required authority to revert this error of yours, see WP:RM#TM. Andrewa (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you attempt to revert the move before raising the technical move request, as suggested both by myself and the process described there? What was the result? Andrewa (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Evangelical Methodist Church

added a link pointing to Book of Discipline

List of The Handmaid's Tale episodes

added a link pointing to Asylum

Wesleyan Methodist Church (United States)

added a link pointing to Book of Discipline

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me in getting this Draft Published. The subject is a professional football coach from india. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Muzamil_Mahmood Dar zubair 07:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sabbath in Christianity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Watson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Soan Meeraas, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of web.archive.org/web/20140318122557/http://soanmeeraas.in/about-us. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
  If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yeeno (talk) 🍁 18:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Anupam! I see that you recently made an edit on Prevenient grace and notice your interest for Methodism. This is just to invite you to browse the arminianism projet pages in order to be more aquainted with it and why not, be a participant.--Telikalive (talk) 08:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Arminianism The goal of WikiProject Arminianism is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Arminianism available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject Arminianism as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Calvinism, but prefers that all Arminian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

... for what you said on User talk:SlimVirgin - missing pictured on my talk, with music full of hope and reformation --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:58, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anupam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Screencast-O-Matic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:10, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Professional sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Abstinence pledge card.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:12, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Evangelical theology shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
--ServB1 (talk) 02:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eternal sin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Nelson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Musafir (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 01:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Masih (surname)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 07:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christian Flag, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diocese of Fort Worth.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The redirect Human arts has been nominated for deletion. – Uanfala (talk) 00:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anupam, we've met in various articles on liturgy etc, and I value your considerate attitude. May I draw your attention on the User Lucifernam, whose statement "Hello from hell" is obviously his programme, for example here [17] and here [18]. As he or she seems to be a very busy bee this complete loss of composure might happen rather often. As I'm rather new: what should one do with such users? Thank you for your attention.--Medusahead (talk) 11:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind respons. Today, I reported to WP:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Lucifernam as I literally found no way to operate WP:AIV suffiently. As proposed, I mentioned that I consulted you first (but I do not know if my try of a ping worked). The grace of God may let you have a blessed Advent season, too! With greetings, --Medusahead (talk) 09:23, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

Requesting your visit to Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find you interest in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lang-hin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Trappist the monk (talk) 13:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

		Season's Greetings
		Here's wishing you a marvellous holiday and the best of 2022 Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:58, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Christian - Catholic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 2#Christian - Catholic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:29, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Janga Gana Mana and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 9#Janga Gana Mana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 22:08, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I left a note in my edit that Viktorija Faith was not selected for Lithuania, as noted on the page itself and on Lithuania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022. I'm unsure where the confusion lies as the Eurovision categories only have selected artists, not national final artists. Since the first line of the page even notes that she did not win the national selection, I don't see the reason to have a discussion about it rather than just removing the incorrect categories. 2600:8801:AC00:9C9:400E:6B:6A5F:E184 (talk) 21:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Last prophet

added a link pointing to John MacArthur

Prophet

added a link pointing to John MacArthur

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of one month for violating the 3 revert rule, grossly so. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 09:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P-block lifted (valid exemption) per User_talk:El_C#Awan_(tribe). El_C 10:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anupam! I did add changes that are correct to the Jal Shah page. (I am her daughter) I did leave an explanation but I believe that it didn't save. But in summary, I changed incorrect info/made it more detailed and accurate. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:4180:27C0:0:0:0:46CF (talk) 02:38, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anupam! I did add changes that are correct to the Jal Shah page. (I am her daughter) I did leave an explanation but I believe that it didn't save. But in summary, I changed incorrect info/made it more detailed and accurate. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:681:4180:27C0:0:0:0:46CF (talk) 02:39, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 19 February 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Derasar, Rajasthan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the residents of Derasar collect rainwater in taankas since the village experiences eleven months of drought a year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Derasar, Rajasthan. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Derasar, Rajasthan), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Knights Templar for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 04:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Outward holiness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calvary Holiness Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE STOP DISTRUPTIVE EDITS AND HIJACKING WESLEYAN THEOLOGY PAGE YOU HAVE HEAVILY EDITED THE PAGE WITH FALSE PERCEPTIONS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.75.125.69 (talk) 17:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC) [reply]

• Hello, don't mean to bother you, but could you do me a favour and take a look at Incense offering‎, Chrism, and Holy anointing oil? An ip user has been copypasting their original work into those articles, and I'm not well versed enough in Wikipedia procedures to deal with it properly. The history pages of those article should make it clear what's been going on. You seem interested in this area and are more familiar with how things work here, so I thought you could help. – Scyrme (talk) 16:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  It was not original work, I am new and was confused. I see now that the writing was not up to standard, and will improve it before posting again somewhere in the future. I will be more careful to place it in the correct article as well or create a new one. I will also take some time to properly refute all of the other theories, and ask some local Witches to help me properly explain how the Orthodox Chrism is a form of Witchcraft. (Unless they tell me it isn't, then I'll admit I'm wrong.) They are suggesting Calamus, which is a dangerous poison and could lead to the serious bodily harm of an innocent. Shawnee15 (talk) 02:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Opposition to the legalisation of drugs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Opposition to the legalisation of drugs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Opposition to the legalization of drugs and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Opposition to the legalization of drugs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:56, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have made a nice improvement to several articles about Anabaptism. I made a couple of minor tweaks, such as Hutterites not practicing footwashing. But you have certainly upgraded them overall. Thanks! Mikeatnip (talk) 13:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

IM

added a link pointing to Independent Methodist

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Screencast-O-Matic icon.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Screencast-O-Matic. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 07:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2018. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved barnstars. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:40, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sausage digits and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 3#Sausage digits until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. QueenofBithynia (talk) 14:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Fundamentalist Atheist and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 15 § Fundamentalist Atheist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avadhnama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avadhnama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 18:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am not sure if you know it, but you can link a category on WCommons to its Wikipedia article. It helps keeping things tidy. For example, with an image you uploaded an did not put into a category :

• create a category on WCommons category putting it inside another category by clicking on the '(+)'. For example, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Agpeya can be put into the cateogry "Prayer book".
• Then, on the left an "Add links" link will appear, so that you will be able click on it to link the category to the Agpeya article.

Veverve (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mechanical Plastics Corp. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mechanical Plastics Corp. (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 02:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/Madam,

I respectfully request your assistance in reviewing my draft article, Draft:Mughal Khel. As a sub-tribe of the Yousafzai, the Mughal Khels are unique in that they are the only Yousafzai tribe residing in Southern Pakhtunkhwa, where they speak a soft version of Pashto. They are based in Bannu and their history and cultural practices have been documented in various online sources and books.

It is my hope that by writing this article, I can contribute to the knowledge base about the Yousafzai tribe and highlight their rich tradition of migration and cultural diversity. I would greatly appreciate your guidance and support in ensuring that the information is accurate and suitable for submission on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely, 18:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Isparki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isparki (talk • contribs)

This one seems like a sock of this banned user, considering how hellbent they were trying to remove the same content [19], as IP [20], [21], [22], [23] [24]. @Aman.kumar.goel, LearnIndology, and Gotitbro:.- 117.201.112.141 (talk) 12:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The language of the edits is too close to be a coincidence. The latest user has also fudged quotes, a clear indicator of edits not in good faith. Should be taken to SPI. Gotitbro (talk) 14:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May even be a sock of this one, considering they tried to undelete an article created by the confirm sock [25], also changing census figures is one of the characteristics @Aman.kumar.goel and Gotitbro:. - 117.201.112.120 (talk) 12:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks now filed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cyber.Eyes.2005. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 12:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

117.201.112.120, I appreciate you letting me and these other editors know. I would recommend that you create an account on Wikipedia as you seem like a constructive editor. Kind regards, Anupam^Talk 07:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the kind words Anupam , I've one. I would like to contact via email if you, Gotitbro or anyone else is willingly to provide email-addresses here. Anyway, I believe this recently created one is this sockfarm, similar change to pop figures. - 117.201.116.39 (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would encourage you to create an account which would enable you to email users from their user pages, see WP:EMAIL. Gotitbro (talk) 11:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see these changes. Also see the changes to the content supported by Witzel's source, that is, usage of the word — 'ancient' before 'Hindu' and 'northwest' before 'Indian subcontinent', which are not exactly written in the source. Pinging @Aman.kumar.goel, LearnIndology, and Gotitbro:. - 117.201.119.158 (talk) 11:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Microsoft Outlook (mobile app) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Outlook (mobile app) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Laicization (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Christian nationalism, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Christian - Anglican has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 22 § Christian - Anglican until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 04:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Christian - Epsicopalian has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 22 § Christian - Epsicopalian until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 04:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Methodist canonical hours.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 06:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I started a discussion on the Britannica source which mentions that the Waldensians eventually came to reject transubstantiation on the talkpage. As you deleted the reference, I would like to hear why do you think that Britannica is not a reliable source in this regard? --ValtteriLahti12 (talk) 15:01, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A long time ago you edited Christmas tree. You had seen there was a separate article for Chrismon tree. You swapped a {{anchor| for a {{main| . However, you had not checked for any possible references to #chrismon tree. By removing the anchor, you broke linking, included from inside the same article (check gallery at end of #Artificial_trees)

An 'anchor' is the destination of a link - *explicitly* created by someone - and just destroying the anchor without finding every use of that link destination is "not a good" thing.

I'll go fix the two broken usages that I know about. Maybe you could look for more? Shenme (talk) 06:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Весела Коледа! ~ Meri Kirihimete!

Hello, Anupam ! Appreciate your commitment to maintaining and improving Wikipedia! Your dedication to enhancing this invaluable source of global knowledge is truly commendable. Thanks for your tireless contributions to its continuous growth and refinement.! Wishing you and your family a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
RV (talk) 05:51, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Anupam, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:25, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:25, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! I want you to move SC de Goa, SC Bengaluru and Mohammedan as it has been seven days since I proposed requested move. Thanks! – 𝙰𝚔𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚟™ 🗿 03:33, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article LTBF (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing the primary topic and only one other topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 03:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Church of Bangladesh is now the anglican church, go to website then write something. And also our all bishops are anglican, we're anglican and you writing united protestant that is not justified. Please Anupam go to website . There is no mark for united protestant otherwise we the members of the Anglican church will complain against you. Please anupam go to their website because iam a member of thet church 123.253.214.143 (talk) 02:29, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mahal family, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:01, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at these unsourced changes and as well as other disruption by the IP with false edit summaries. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Our Lady of Graces.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Derivative work. Wrong license.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sreejith K (talk) 13:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Church of God (Restoration), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church of God.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wesleyan theology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Methodist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Christian denominations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Campbell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Cord of Saint Philomena.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evangelical Wesleyan Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northville, NY.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]