Hello, Akmal94, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Laterthanyouthink (talk) 03:10, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Akmal94! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rivertorch. Your recent edit to the page Kabul appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I note that you have made similar changes, also unsourced, to other articles about cities and regions in Afghanistan. According to policy, all content in articles must be verifiable, so please cite a reliable source for all such changes, and use an edit summary to explain what you're doing. Thanks. Rivertorch (talk) 04:32, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kohistan District, Kapisa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. You also removed sourced content without explanation at Hesa Awal Kohistan District. Please don't do that. If there's a valid reason for removing, explain on the article's talk page or at least use an edit summary. Rivertorch (talk) 04:38, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of pornographic sub-genres, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of pornographic sub-genres may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{Verify source|date=July

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of pornographic sub-genres, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Geniac (talk) 00:11, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of pornographic sub-genres, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Warning for regularly and repeatedly deleting the exact same content on the exact same article. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 06:52, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pir Roshan.jpg, which you've attributed to yourself. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 03:00, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pir Roshan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Lewis Secondary School (Mississauga), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Owen× ☎ 02:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries, so that people can see why you are doing what you do. For example, in this edit you gave no explanation at all why you removed the content, which makes it unsurprising that other editors have reverted your change. Also, you should be aware that repeatedly making the same edits when other editors have reverted them, known as edit warring, is considered disruptive, and can lead to being blocked from editing. That is particularly likely if you give no explanation of why you are making the edit that you repeat. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:41, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 10:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for image copyright violations, personal attacks and edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:04, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not engage in necromancy, i.e. "raise the dead": you just replied to a ten year old comment on Talk:Avestan language. Don't do that. Ogress _smash! 23:33, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a problem? i doubt anyone would reply to that and i am replying to clear confusions further readers may have. Akmal94 (talk) 23:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were kind of worked up for something that is clearing up confusions further readers may have. No one is reading the talk pages on random web pages. (Except you.) Ogress _smash! 05:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Battle of Rajasthan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

Consensus should be reached on the talk page before the article is edited. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:12, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not in any edit war. Mr. Kautilya can't prove his assertions for a single sentence for an article that hardly has any resources so he is going by his own judgement.. Akmal94 (talk) 07:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Kautilya3 (talk) 19:18, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akmal94. You have new messages at Talk:Theory of Pashtun descent from Israelites.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Bejnar (talk) 20:41, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too many of these are emotional statements of your own position/belief, provided without sources. I'll repeat the alert posted to you by User:Kautilya3: " This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, ourstandards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks." This includes behavior on talk pages. I advise you to consider both changing your tone and when you state your beliefs to use sources. Please remember that talk pages aren't webforums. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 10:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm addressing weak sources and unsourced material on Wikipedia where there aren't any sources in the first place. You can't really ban me for a having a neutral point of view, even one of Wiki's policy mention this. I suggest you to read WP:YESPOV on Neutral point view. Secondly, i haven't been asked to provide sources if i have distaste with a particular edit while i would address my views in the talk page after consulting with a few users first. Thirdly. my 3 month old disscusion with Kautilya is irrelevant to this disscusion. If you did read that talk page though, i was calling out the authencitiy of the battle in the article with provided sources. Thank you for your concern. Akmal94 (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sarfaraz Khan (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pashtun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akmal94. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akmal94. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raisani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pashtun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akmal94. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Akmal94. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hazaras; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wario-Man (talk) 11:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi There have been serious vandalism and POV pushing in saffarids article. It is changed to persian dynasty from iranic, which is totally false. Hope you can take a look and fix it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.44.102 (talk) 22:24, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Pashtun tribes. In the past, you have used rotating IP addresses as per here and here to push the very same sentiment. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. In this time and age, "Afghan" is no longer synonymous with "Pashtun" as "Afghan" has become a nationality even under Afghanistan's own constitution which includes Tajik, Hazara, Uzbek, Pashtuns, and other ethnicities living in Afghanistan. This article is not about Pashtun Tribes' history but just Pashtun Tribes. Let's not inject nationalism here nor indulge in edit-warring.  McKhan  ^(talk) 10:17, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has nothing to do with nationalism but the usage of the word in an article which has historically been connected to the Pashtuns. The article is about Pashtun tribes and their history so the word "Afghan" merits a mention, your thinking on modern grounds. If you have a problem with it, then you should have used the talk page to voice your concern instead of leaving messages on my talk page. I am going revert your edit because i don't see anything wrong with mentioning the word Afghan. Akmal94 (talk) 20:35, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I have not reverted your edit as I didn't want to indulge in edit-warring. Second, you have used rotating IP addresses (here and here) in the past to push the very same sentiment. And third, I have gone through your edit history (For example, see here. This is just one example, there are more.) as well as this Talk Page which doesn't come across that you have any love for the Pakistani Pashtuns or it isn't about nationalism to you, as per your own edit history and the entries (i.e cautions, warnings) made by other editors. As per this talk page, you have indulged in edit-warring in the past and you have been warned by Doug Weller and others. Now coming back to the sentence, I have already clarified that this article is not about Pashtun Tribes' history but just Pashtun Tribes hence my edit. I left this message here because you have used the rotating IP addresses to push the very same sentiment so it seems that you feel very strongly about having "Afghan" in that article although there are plenty of Pashtun-related Wikipedia articles out there that I don't go and edit them on the basis of Afghan vs. Pashtun. You could have simply added the word "historically" and be done with that but you didn't, instead, you resorted to using rotating IP addresses to push your sentiment although you could have used the Talk Page as well before making that edit. Thank you.  McKhan  ^(talk) 02:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow bold words coming from someone who has been on here for 15 years but is trying to instigate users! You're engaging in WP:HARASS by trying to accuse me of editing from different IP's. I told you could have addressed the issue with my edit on the talk page, but no, you had to come here and leave this message on my page to make it look personal. If you did read the article, you would know there is a small history section dedicated to how Pashtuns formed so the word Afghan deserves to be mentioned as thats what they were known as historically. Even in some parts of Afghanistan, the word Afghan or Afghani is used interchangeably with Pashtuns and their language. Akmal94 (talk) 21:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• You have been told enough times that you must stop using "Pashtun" and "Afghan" interchangeably. You will be reported if you persisted with this POV. Shashank5988 (talk) 17:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and report me then because i will report you as well for leaving threats on peoples pages. Looking at your talk page, you seem to be quite a vandal. Akmal94 (talk) 00:20, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pashtuns. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 02:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 02:55, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir/Madam,

I respectfully request your assistance in reviewing my draft article, Draft:Mughal Khel. As a sub-tribe of the Yousafzai, the Mughal Khels are unique in that they are the only Yousafzai tribe residing in Southern Pakhtunkhwa, where they speak a soft version of Pashto. They are based in Bannu and their history and cultural practices have been documented in various online sources and books.

It is my hope that by writing this article, I can contribute to the knowledge base about the Yousafzai tribe and highlight their rich tradition of migration and cultural diversity. I would greatly appreciate your guidance and support in ensuring that the information is accurate and suitable for submission on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely, 18:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Isparki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isparki (talk • contribs)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Akmal94 reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: ). Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Austronesier. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pashtuns without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Austronesier (talk) 10:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing the article Pashtuns for because of your edit-warring and ownership behaviour on the article, which have recurred over a period of several years.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 14:16, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Following your recent comment at Talk:Pashtuns, I have extended the block to be site-wide, apart from this talk page, where you still have editing access in order to enable you to post constructively in relation to the block. If there are no other changes in circumstances, the site-wide block may be lifted after three days, and replaced by a partial block from Pashtuns & Talk:Pashtuns. JBW (talk) 13:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]