Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Look carefully at the revision history - I think you're editing the old version which is the subject of much edit warring, not the current version. I think this is the version that should be restored and you should be looking at. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm agnostic to which one is restored, by removing the bad sources hopefully they will stay out however the edit warring resolves. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 18:42, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you revert, maybe they'll revert again and break 3rr. I am sure they are a sock. Doug Weller talk 12:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even if they're not the sourcing just doesn't back up what they want to add. I didn't even need to revert them, as someone else has come to the same conclusion. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 13:17, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So I see. I've been editing the Columbus Ohio article to add info about a Neo-Nazi march and ended up having to edit several other articles after seeing the sources. A pain. Doug Weller talk 13:47, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've temporarily watchlisted the page, just so it has an extra pair of eyes on it. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 14:36, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well they're now at 5r, and have started edit warring elsewhere . -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 15:31, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15:39 Widr (A) talk contribs block blocked 2.189.167.3 talk with an expiration time of 1 week (anon. only, account creation blocked) (block evasion + disruption) Doug Weller talk 15:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the revert at Dome was when the AGF ran out. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 15:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"one day I hope to upgrade Wikipedia's perceived reliability from meme worthy to just unreliable."

Ok, this made me chuckle. Good comment, which hits the spot pretty good on the standard of Wikipedia today.

Good luck. Though I fear the effort is futile. Laddmeister (talk) 14:04, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah definitely not meant to be taken seriously, there no way a single person could accomplish such an impossible task! ;) The work will never be done, there will always be more improvements that can be made. Realistically the goal is contributing to that effort, rather than any hope of seeing it completed. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 14:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, of course not. But just the fact that you're recognizing the current problems with wikipedia (political activism and edit-warring) is enough for me to give you two thumbs up. Laddmeister (talk) 14:40, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard § RfC: Times of Israel. Chess (talk) (please mention me on reply) 20:28, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]