User:Nahallac Silverwinds
——————————————— MY USER PAGE ———————————————
Welcome!Disclaimer: My writings should not be viewed as a completely accurate depiction of my views; rather, they should be viewed as an effort to achieve a more accurate portrayal of topics near and dear to me. Although Wikipedia attempts to be a perfectly neutral medium, it falls short of that goal. One of the problems crops up when a biased author writes an article which contains valid information mixed with invalid information. As Wikipedia frowns on the deletion of such articles, the only solution is to modify the article gradually until it can be said to contain something approaching neutral information. Nahallac Silverwinds, also known by the abbreviation Naha on the Internet, is an American contributor to Wikipedia. Nahallac Silverwinds was first used in 2002 as my EverQuest persona. Since that time I have used it in a myriad of places throughout the Internet as one of my pseudonyms. Wiki WorkI am easily distracted, so my train of thought tends to get derailed by another interest, but sooner or later I hope to get around to completing everything I've started!
Articles Started Major Contributions of Note
Minor Contributions of Note
Useful Links
UsersHelpful user pages:
Wikifriends:
Really cool users who don't have a clue who I am:
PeopleSince there is nothing inherently interesting about me this is a close as I can get.My relatives include:
People I have met and actually had a conversation with:
Games I am waiting for
|
InfoboxSunday, 15 December
Always Assume Good FaithWhat am I working on right now?
We are All PeopleWikipedia:Babel
WikiProjects I Belong ToOther WikiProjects That Interest MeWikipediholic Test Score
|
Shiny Stuff
- This editor is a Veteran Editor, and is entitled to display this Iron Editor Star.
- The Copyeditor's Barnstar for the excellent copyediting efforts on The Fabulous Kangaroos, especially for helping a clueless dane out with "that there English". MPJ-DK 20:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- The Copyeditor's Barnstar for an amazing copy-edit on December to Dismember (2006) :) Davnel03 09:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- The Tireless Contributor Barnstar I, Zenlax award Nahallac Silverwinds, LaraLove, and Davnel03 the Tireless Contributor Barnstar for applying the time to edit Randy Orton's article and making an effort to get it in encyclopedic form. The three of you deserve it. Enjoy. Zenlax 12:54, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- The Super Hidden Barnstar This user has found Penubag 's secret hidden sub page! Can you find it? Version: 2
- The Hybrid has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. - A Wikihug for Nahallac Silverwinds. Have a wikihug because you recognise that wikihugs are great things to have! Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 04:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- I, Zenlax award Nahallac Silverwinds, Deep Shadow, Zerorules677, and Nikki311 the Professional Wrestling Star, for getting Shawn Michaels's article to Good Article status. Keep up the good work. And hopefully getting other wrestling articles to Good status. Zenlax 19:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- The Excellent Userpage Award - You did make a great edit to my userpage, and I know nothing will ever be as great as yours. You have an excellent userpage, which is professional, organized and looks great. Keep on editing! Cheers, Lex94 Talk Contributions Signatures 15:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'd like to thank you on your copyedits for both Mickie James' and Amy Dumas' articles. I've never given anyone anything like this before, but I'm happy for you to be first. See you around the Wiki. Deep Shadow 02:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
This user is a member of the Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia. |