Hello. This page contains decreasing amounts of information over time, as I consider myself, as a Wikipedian, rather less important than my edits. But I get curious about other editors, so it'd be hypocritical to say nothing at all.
Recommendations
Here are a few bits of suggested reading for everybody working on any collaborative online project, but especially this one...
Superb and constant edits to the Brighton pages Ukbn2 17:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Security
Committed identity: e5d62199635c1df04e870cbed41fea6988d69ad7a7cef03f106090e03ffde46f1953798d5d2e498c2d5a5143d006ac2228596b29ca4775ccbdc55fb4a89e513d is an SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.
This user is pro-choice for different types of English and is against the Americanization of Wikipedia.
Just to further explain my use of this box up there in the babel list. If creating a British topic, I use British English; I respect U.S. topics by using U.S. English there (and indeed Canadian topics by using Canadian English; hence my avoiding the term "American English"...). This is in-keeping with current guidelines, presuming they've not been messed around with again recently. Although I disagree strongly with recommendations that the choice should be predicated on the initial editor; it should be dictated by the locale of the topic. I will be very grateful to other editors who also respect the guidelines, employ common sense, and refrain from "fixing" the variant of English without valid reason.
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung