Eisspeedway

Quinisext Council

"Council in Trullo" redirects here. For the earlier council held in the same place, see Third Council of Constantinople.
Quinisext Council
A 16th-century Russian depiction of the council
Date692
Accepted byEastern Orthodoxy
Previous council
Third Council of Constantinople
Next council
Second Council of Nicaea
Convoked byEmperor Justinian II
PresidentJustinian II
TopicsDiscipline
Documents and statements
Basis for Eastern Orthodox canon law
Chronological list of ecumenical councils
Part of a series on the
Eastern Orthodox Church
Christ Pantocrator (Deesis mosaic detail)
Mosaic of Christ Pantocrator, Hagia Sophia
Overview
Background
Organization
Autocephalous jurisdictions
Autocephalous Churches who are officially part of the communion:

Autocephaly recognized by some autocephalous Churches de jure:

Autocephaly and canonicity recognized by Constantinople and 3 other autocephalous Churches:

Spiritual independence recognized by Georgian Orthodox Church:


Autonomous jurisdictions

Semi-Autonomous:

Episcopal assemblies
Noncanonical jurisdictions
Ecumenical councils
  • Other possible ecumenical councils:
  • Other important councils:
History
Theology
Liturgy and worship
Liturgical calendar
  • The four fasting periods:
Major figures
Other topics

The Quinisext Council (Latin: Concilium Quinisextum; Koinē Greek: Πενθέκτη Σύνοδος, romanized: Penthékti Sýnodos), i.e., the Fifth-Sixth Council, often called the Council in Trullo, Trullan Council, or the Penthekte Synod, was a church council held in 692 at Constantinople under Justinian II.

The synod is known as the "Council in Trullo" because, like the Sixth Ecumenical Council, it was held in a domed hall in the Imperial Palace (τρούλος [troúlos], meaning a cup or dome). Both the Fifth and the Sixth Ecumenical Councils had omitted to draw up disciplinary canons, and as this council was intended to complete both in this respect, it took the name of Quinisext.

Decisions

Many of the council's canons were reiterations. It endorsed not only the six ecumenical councils already held (canon 1), but also:

The council also confirmed authority of Church Fathers:

Ban on pre-Christian practices

The Council banned certain festivals and practices which were thought to have a Pagan origin. Therefore, the Council gives some insight to historians about pre-Christian religious practices.[2] As a consequence, neither cleric nor layman was allowed to observe the Pagan festivals of Bota,[3] the Kalends or the Brumalia.[4]

Ritual observance

Many of the council's canons were aimed at settling differences in ritual observance and clerical discipline in different parts of Christendom. Being held under Byzantine auspices, with an exclusively Eastern clergy, these overwhelmingly took the practice of the Church of Constantinople as orthodox.[2]

Armenian practices

The council explicitly condemned some customs of Armenian Christians; among them using wine unmixed with water for the Eucharist,[5] choosing children of clergy for appointment as clergy,[6] and eating eggs and cheese on Saturdays and Sundays of Lent.[7] And the council proclaimed deposition for clergy and excommunication for laypeople who contravened the canons prohibiting these practices.[8]

Roman practices

Likewise, it reprobated, with similar penalties, the Roman custom of not allowing married individuals to be ordained to the diaconate or priesthood unless they vowed for perpetual continence and living separately from their wives,[9] and fasting on Saturdays of Lent.[10] Nevertheless, it also prescribed continence during those times when serving at the altar.[9] Without contrasting with the practice of the Roman Church, it also prescribed that the celebration of the Eucharist in Lent should only happen in Saturdays, Sundays, and the feast of the Annunciation.[11][1][8]

Eucharist, liturgy, evangelising, baptism

Grapes, milk and honey were not to be offered at the altar. Whoever came to receive the Eucharist should receive in the hand by holding his hands in the form of a cross. The Eucharist was not allowed to be given to dead bodies. During the liturgy the psalms were to be sung in modest and dulcet tones, and the phrase 'who was crucified for us' was not to be added to the Trisagion. Prelates were to preach the gospel as propounded by the fathers. Priests received special instructions on how to deal with those who were not baptized and they were also given rubrics to follow on how to admit heretics to the faith.[8]

Moral guidelines for clerics and laity

In addition to these, the council also condemned clerics that had improper or illicit relations with women. It condemned simony and the charging of fees for administering the Eucharist. It enjoined those in holy orders from entering public houses, engaging in usurious practices, attending horse races in the Hippodrome, wearing unsuitable clothes or celebrating the liturgy in private homes (eukterion) without the consent of their bishops. Both clergy and laity were forbidden from gambling with dice, attending theatrical performances, or consulting soothsayers. No one was allowed to own a house of prostitution, engage in abortion, arrange hair in ornate plaits or to promote pornography. It also ordered law students at the University of Constantinople to cease wearing "clothing contrary to the general custom".[4][8] Consumption of any blood either directly or through meat was prohibited on pain of deposition & excommunication for clergy and excommunication for laity.[12]

Acceptance

The Quinisext canons found their way into Byzantine canonical collections even in the iconoclast period (despite the approval given to images of Christ in canon 82). The immediate reaction of the see of Rome was fiercely hostile, partly because two canons (13 and 55) explicitly criticized Roman practices, but more because Rome resented being expected to approve a whole sheaf of new canons only retrospectively. In 711, however, Pope Constantine appears to have accepted a compromise whereby Rome accepted the validity of the canons in the East, while being allowed to continue existent western practices where these differed.

Later a letter by Pope Hadrian I (dating to 785) quoting Tarasios of Constantinople approving the canons was attributed in the West as an explicit statement of approval by Hadrian himself. Tarasios' letter was read out and affirmed during the Second Council of Nicea, which in its first canon explicitly accepts the canons of Trullo. In consequence of the preceding, Gratian (twelfth-century) cited many of the Quinisext Canons in his own great collection of canons, the Concord of Discordant Canons. Where, however, they clashed with western canons or practice, he set them aside as representing Byzantine practice but lacking universal validity. Gratian's work remained authoritative in the West until the first systematic Code of Catholic Canon Law, issued in 1917.[13]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "CHURCH FATHERS: Council in Trullo (A.D. 692)". www.newadvent.org. Retrieved 2023-08-22.
  2. ^ a b Ostrogorsky, George; Hussey, Joan (trans.) (1957). History of the Byzantine state. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. pp. 122–23. ISBN 0-8135-0599-2.
  3. ^ Trombley, Frank R. (2005). The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195187922. Retrieved Nov 17, 2021.
  4. ^ a b Canon 71
  5. ^ Canon 32
  6. ^ Canon 33
  7. ^ Canon 56
  8. ^ a b c d Andrew Ekonomou. Byzantine Rome and the Greek Popes. Lexington Books, 2007
  9. ^ a b Canon 13
  10. ^ Canon 55
  11. ^ Canon 52
  12. ^ Canon 67
  13. ^ Richard Price, The Canons of the Quinisext Council, Liverpool 2020, 34-54.

Further reading

Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trullan_Council