Template:WikiProject Conservatism
 | Conservatism C‑class High‑importance     | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Template documentation[view] [edit] [history] [purge]Usage
This template {{WikiProject Conservatism|class=|importance=}} adds into Category:WikiProject Conservatism articles. The project banner template should be added (not subst:ed) to the talk page of articles within the scope of the project. While the template does not require any additional parameters, it has a number of optional ones that add various extra features to the banner. Please add into the article's talk page while in the scope in the project. The syntax as it follows:
{{WikiProject Conservatism
|class=
|importance=
|auto=
|attention=
|needs-infobox=
|needs-image=
|listas=
|category=
}}
Parameters
- class – valid values are fa, a, ga, b, c, start, stub, fl, list, na (case-insensitive). See the project's quality scale for details. Setting an explicit value of NA is rarely necessary; for this, either leave
|class=blank or omit the parameter. - importance – valid values are: top, high, mid, low, na (case-insensitive). See the project's importance scale for details. Setting an explicit value of NA is rarely necessary; for this, either leave
|importance=blank or omit the parameter. - auto – This parameter is for the use of bots and indicates that the article has been automatically rated:
|auto=length– based on the length of the article|auto=inherit– because one or more other projects use this class|auto=yes(or|auto=stub), in conjunction with|class=stub– as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template- Use of the above values (or value combinations) with this parameter populates Category:Automatically assessed Conservatism articles.
- attention – set
|attention=yesif the article needs immediate attention from experienced editors. Use only if another parameter does not cover the need for attention; this should be used sparingly. It is strongly encouraged to also add a section to the talk page explaining what needs attention.- This parameter populates Category:Conservatism articles needing attention.
- needs-infobox – set
|needs-infobox=yesif the article needs an infobox. Remember that infoboxes are not suitable for all articles, and can overwhelm short articles.- This parameter populates Category:Conservatism articles needing infoboxes.
- needs-image – set
|needs-image=yesif the article needs an image.- This parameter populates Category:Wikipedia requested images of conservatism.
- image-details – (appears only if
|needs-image=yesis set) Additional details to describe the image that is requested.
- listas – This parameter, which is the equivalent of the DEFAULTSORT sortkey that should be placed on all biographical articles, is a sortkey for the article talk page (e.g. for Edmund Burke, use
|listas=Burke, Edmundso that the talk page will show up in the B's and not the E's of the various assessment and administrative categories). This is important because it is one source used by those who set DEFAULTSORT on the article; consider also setting the DEFAULTSORT for the article when setting this parameter. For more information about this, please see Wikipedia:Categorization of people § Ordering names in a category.
If the article is using {{WikiProject banner shell}} then it is preferable to add|listas=to that template instead of a project banner template. Putting the parameter on more than one template is not required. - category – set
|category=noif, and only if, a banner is being used for demonstration or testing purposes, to prevent unnecessary or undesirable categorization. Otherwise, omit this parameter.
Quality assessment
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Banner Shell}}. Articles that have the {{WikiProject Conservatism}} project banner on their talk page will be added to the appropriate categories by quality.
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
| FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Conservatism articles) |  FA |
|
| A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Conservatism articles) |  A |
|
| GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Conservatism articles) |  GA |
|
| B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Conservatism articles) | B | |
| C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Conservatism articles) | C | |
| Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Conservatism articles) | Start | |
| Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Conservatism articles) | Stub | |
| FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Conservatism articles) | FL |
|
| List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Conservatism articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Quality scale
Importance assessment
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Conservatism}} project banner on its talk page:
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=???}}
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
| Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Conservatism articles) | Top | |
| High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Conservatism articles) | High | |
| Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Conservatism articles) | Mid | |
| Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Conservatism articles) | Low | |
| NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Conservatism articles) | NA | |
| ??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Conservatism articles) | ??? |
Importance scale
See also
- ^ For example, this image of the Battle of Normandy is grainy, but very few pictures of that event exist. However, where quite a number of pictures exist, for instance, the moon landing, FPC attempts to select the best of the ones produced.
- ^ An image has more encyclopedic value (often abbreviated to "EV" or "enc" in discussions) if it contributes strongly to a single article, rather than contributing weakly to many. Adding an image to numerous articles to gain EV is counterproductive and may antagonize both FPC reviewers and article editors.
- ^ While effects such as black and white, sepia, oversaturation, and abnormal angles may be visually pleasing, they often detract from the accurate depiction of the subject.
