The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:33, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

• ... that Only Up! was removed from Steam twice: once after a copyright violation and again after SCKR Games, the indie developer behind the game, was stressed? Source: [1]: "The model in question is listed on Sketchfab, which explicitly states its for non-commercial use. Only Up! is a $10 game, and it’s being used to make money, which goes directly against the guidelines set out." and [2]: "The post added that the developer plans to “take a pause” and continue their education..."
  • Reviewed:
  • Comment: This is my first GA and DYK, so hopefully I did everything right.

Improved to Good Article status by TrademarkedTarantula (talk). Self-nominated at 03:13, 13 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Only Up!; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing: - See below
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Overall: @TrademarkedTarantula: Could you clarify what makes Dexerto, In The Know, TechAU, and Try Hard Guides reliable sources? Furthermore, please consider this slightly shortened hook:

• ALT0a: ... that Only Up! was removed from sale twice: once over copyright violations and again to alleviate the developer's stress?

Lastly, albeit strictly optional in the scope of this DYK, I think you should mention the numerous clones that have been created. Sources include this one, which I found on a whim. Regards, IceWelder [✉] 10:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

• Just passing by this nom, but I noticed Dexerto does have an editorial policy, physical address and staff listed, which is a good sign [3]. Not so good, there was an RfC at the reliable sources noticeboard to deprecate it (the RfC did not pass). ☆ Bri (talk) 02:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
• For TechAU and Try Hard Guides, I've discussed their reliability here. Not so sure about In The Know... I'll have to delete it. Tarantula^TM (speak with me) (my legacy) 07:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Point taken in regards to Try Hard Guides, and it appears Dexerto is considered situational per WP:VG/RS. I also found that In the Know is part of Yahoo!; assuming it is held to similar standards, it might be reliable after all. The author of that particular review also has creds. On the other hand, I think TechAU should be removed: The editor's only relevant experience is with the site itself. You should consider listing them at WT:VG/RS at some point, although this is out-of-scope for this DYK and I don't want to hold it up for too long. IceWelder [✉] 12:20, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

Re ALT0a, I like its conciseness. However, I'd like to make a few changes to it:
ALT0b: ...that Only Up! was removed from Steam twice: once over copyright violations and again to alleviate the developer's stress?
Re TechAU usage, I have removed the source from the article. Tarantula^TM (speak with me) (my legacy) 06:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

The article looks fine now. Happy to approve ALT0b. Cheers, IceWelder [✉] 10:41, 16 November 2023 (UTC)