• Brentito86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. . DatBot (talk) 05:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Appears to be in good faith. Spencer^T•C

• DisneyEditor1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - SpongeBob SquarePants season 7 was changed by DisneyEditor1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91034 on 2025-01-22T06:18:36+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 06:18, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• Trudoholic (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. . DatBot (talk) 06:30, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• 103.42.251.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). . DatBot (talk) 09:28, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• 77.78.52.78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). . DatBot (talk) 11:01, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• 49.149.97.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). . DatBot (talk) 11:29, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• 193.117.138.212 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Ifold was changed by 193.117.138.212 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955173 on 2025-01-22T11:41:49+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 11:41, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• Penuel Shimenyi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). . DatBot (talk) 11:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• 35.149.244.155 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). . DatBot (talk) 11:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• 185.185.179.8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Jamal Musiala was changed by 185.185.179.8 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918292 on 2025-01-22T12:47:15+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 12:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• 78.128.45.122 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 46 five times in the last 5 minutes ("Poop" vandalism, details). . DatBot (talk) 12:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• User:BASS79 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Repeated, wilful vandalism against site rules, despite my attempts to advise. History of Shabooh Shoobah speaks for itself. 51.19.140.156 (talk) 04:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

  Page protected. Spencer^T•C 06:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Raven Lapuz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Disruptive editing after final warning.— Anita5192 (talk) 05:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• 118.210.211.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:18, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• Tanmay123456 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Vandalized multiple pages via his IP 194.209.10.66. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 08:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• Firesnake Studio (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Blackmail (diff): account is being used only for promotional purposes. repetitive insertion of links to https://vardags.com. Zac67 (talk) 12:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 56 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 4 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

• MarylandStaff876 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "(admin|coordinator|bureaucrat|check *user|developer|moderator|oversight|steward|sysop|committee|staff)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Name may imply a position of authority -- DQB (owner / report) 18:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• Willow3d Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 20:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• Шерзодбек шокирович (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

   Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• TheWrld'sGreatestDetective (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

  This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Albertus De Bruin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)

  This username matched "ruin" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 11:30, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• MassDOTComms (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Softblock required. They came into IRC live chat looking for help with draft, good faith editor. qcne (talk) 19:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 20:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• TimmyTheBleachDrinker (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. TLJ7863 (talk) 19:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

  Not a blatant violation of the username policy. User has vandalized. No edits since final warning. --Ahecht (TALK
  PAGE) 20:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• Olive Juice Community (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Editing List of intentional communities. MCE89 (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

  Being discussed with the user. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Vaarthadaily (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. – DreamRimmer (talk) 07:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• WebsoftGuide (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Promoting https://discoverwebsoft.com/. – DreamRimmer (talk) 07:30, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• REDISCOVERBHARAT (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. "Rediscover Bharat (India)" sound like a name of a tourism agency 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 07:48, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
• Promethean Society (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Wikishovel (talk) 07:59, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• 2025 assassination of Sharia judges in Iran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Contentious topic restriction. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 09:03, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/IRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 14:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Is there any disruption to the article? — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:50, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As implied above. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Paul Cézanne (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 06:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 12:00, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Lolong (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Continuous unreferenced edits from IP users.[1][2][3] Hotwiki (talk) 13:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No reverts on article for a couple of days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Subhas Chandra Bose (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Requesting temporary protection (extended confirmed) due to recent edit warring between multiple users. Likely the product of his upcoming birth anniversary. Yue🌙 22:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: SuvGh (talk · contribs) blocked by The Bushranger. for 24 hours. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• EnterpriseDB (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Long history of COI editing and promotion. See username of this editor, [4], [5], [6], recent edit warring [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]. --Richard Yin (talk) 23:25, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 23:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

I think it's worth considering protecting the page anyway, given that this has gone on for years across multiple accounts/IPs. --Richard Yin (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined for now as, since I blocked the account causing trouble today, it was the first significant editing to the article in three months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Stewart Rhodes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Preemptive measure due to rampant J6 related vandalism. -FactsheetPete (talk) 23:46, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• New Azerbaijan Party (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unregistered users keep removing the 'anti-colonialism' from the infobox, while keeping the reference intact. therefore I request semi protection, most useful edits have been done by registered users. – Nar 2608 – 02:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Article gets light editing as it is; it seems like the editors are handling the disruption well enough for now. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Bigg Boss Kannada season 11 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Reality TV show with only the final episode to go, lots of IP edits pushing their preferred winner and just being disruptive. A week a peace would be helpful to the regular maintainers. Ravensfire (talk) 06:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Flag of Mozambique (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection for one day. The article is the main DYK on the front page today and the topic-matter is inviting more anonymous vandalism than is usual or expected. Yue🌙 07:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• List of presidents of the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent edit warring by (multiple new users? Multiple socks?) Users have been repeatedly asked to go to the tp and discuss, but so far 'no go'. Thanks - \\'cLf 07:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 08:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Chief of the General Staff (Pakistan) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP continues to make unsourced edits. WikiEnthusiast1001 (talk) 07:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Little Princess (British TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent vandalism by anonymous IP addresses Dipper Dalmatian (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• User talk:Gotitbro (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Frost 09:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

@Gotitbro: Do you want it protected? In any case, I removed the personal attacks from view, for the time being. Lectonar (talk) 09:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• List of battles involving Georgia (country) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A great combo of sockpuppetry (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mindirman Jaloliddin) and IP (possibly a sock as well) persistently disrupting the article. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Battle of Bolnisi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry since November by Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mindirman Jaloliddin. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:04, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Tajol Rosli Mohd Ghazali (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last disruptive edit was about 6 weeks ago. Lectonar (talk) 11:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Beast Games (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 12:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Hendrus Anding (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 12:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Chong Kah Kiat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Normal rookie (talk) 12:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Cobra Kai season 6 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by numerous IP users. Areaseven (talk) 12:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Jamal Musiala (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 12:38, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Public forum debate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 12:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• Dave Isaacson (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: The edit includes a source from the Department of Defense Inspector General and the page isn't allowed to include that source. Airman79 (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

@Airman79: This request is a request to lower protection on a title that isn't protected, and reads more like an edit request. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 00:39, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

There is no Wikipedia page for Dave Isaacson. Most likely the requester intended to refer to David Isaacson. Still, that is not a page under any form of protection. EdJohnston (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Monitorapp (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Page is protected from 2018. I am trying to publish the draft I wrote, but I keep getting blocked. Please help me lift this protection. Tashialala (talk) 07:11, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined @Tashialala: I suggest you run your draft through the WP:AFC process. We can unprotect if it gets accepted. Lectonar (talk) 08:55, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Windows NT 3.51 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Cassiopeia talk 08:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

• Joe Biden (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Remove: "Historians and political scientists rank Bozo as above average in historical rankings of American presidents."

Way too soon to suggest that in the main text of the article! He has barely left office, its going to be at least a few months before such a bold claim can be made. Is there really enough historians and political scientists saying this to justify this claim? BlunanNation (talk) 08:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

 Already done Ultraodan (talk) 12:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Currently, the lede states "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, taking 251 captive, against which Israelis responded applying the controversial Hannibal Directive, resulting in the death of 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals, among which 815 civilians.". This implies that the majority of the casualties were caused by Israel applying the Hannibal Directive, and despite some cases of casualties due to this, no credible source has made the claim that the majority of casualties originate from it. I suggest changing the lede back to what it was before it was randomly edited to the current lede without any discussion on the talk page about it, to "On 7 October 2023, Hamas-led militant groups launched a surprise attack on Israel, killing 1,195 Israelis and foreign nationals and taking 251 captive." Aradkipod (talk) 12:29, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In the section labeled "Initial Israeli counter-operation (October 2023)" it states the following: "A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used, killing many Israeli civilians and soldiers.[181][182] An ABC News (Australia) investigation reported that at least 13 civilians were killed in a 'Hannibal' incident in Beeri."

These sentences are incorrect and not supported by the sourced references. First off, the word "many" in the first sentence is gratuitous, misleading, and, perhaps most importantly, not supported by the Haaretz article it references, which never concludes that any citizens were killed as a direct result of a so-called "Hannibal" directive. Nowhere in the article does it state that the Hannibal directive can be tied to *any* deaths, let alone "many" deaths. Any reference in the article to potential deaths caused by a Hannibal directive are stated as questions, or that investigations are forthcoming. (e.g., "Haaretz does not know whether or how many civilians and soldiers were hit due to these procedures, but the cumulative data indicates that many of the kidnapped people were at risk, exposed to Israeli gunfire, even if they were not the target.") Either way, it certainly does not conclude that "many" deaths were tied to the use of the "Hannibal directive" which is highly misleading.

Similarly, as to the second sentence, the ABC News (Australia) does not conclude that " at least 13 civilians were killed in a 'Hannibal' incident in Beeri". It discusses a tank shooting at a house in Kibbutz Berri , but never states that there is evidence that the IDF tank fire resulted in the death of 13 civilians -- as opposed to the 40 Hamas gunmen who were holding them captive and engaged in a "firefight" with the IDF at the time of the tank fire. The 40 Hamas gunmen could just as easily have killed them as opposed to tank fire. Indeed, an eyewitness stated "Mr Shifroni's aunt Ayala and her grand-niece Liel and grand-nephew Yanai were all killed at Pessi's house — he believes by terrorists", not by the IDF and ""There are a few others that we still don't know and we may never know what exactly killed them." Later on in the article, it states "The team determined that most of the hostages were likely murdered by the terrorists, and further inquiries and reviews of additional findings are necessary.".

I propose that the sentences be re-worded as follows: "A July 2024 Haaretz investigation revealed that the IDF ordered the Hannibal Directive to be used at three locations, putting the lives of some Israeli civilians being held by Hamas at those locations at risk.[181][182]. An ABC News (Australia) investigation reported that after a prolonged firefight in Kibbutz Be'eri with around 40 Hamas gunmen who had been holding 15 hostages inside and outside, 13 of the hostages may have been killed by either the Hamas captors or IDF tank fire."

Apndrew (talk) 05:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Sar Sokha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

this website is using wrong prime minister sor sokha picture please delete for purpose to not let other see the wrong picture and confuse about it StvenZzz (talk) 05:53, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Done by the person who submitted the request in the first place. (It would have been declined in the first place as the page isn't protected.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 06:23, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Since I cannot reply to my original request on this, I am starting a new request with a different source for the request and a revised sentence:

In the fourth paragraph of the entry, it states."A case accusing Israel of committing genocide is being reviewed by the International Court of Justice,...."

This should be changed to "Cases accusing both Israel and Hamas of committing genocide have been lodged with or are being reviewed by the International Court of Justice,..."

This change is supported by multiple references: https://www.timesofisrael.com/9-bereaved-israeli-families-bring-icc-war-crime-genocide-complaint-against-hamas/ "The families of nine Israeli victims of the October 7 Hamas massacre have lodged a complaint at the International Criminal Court (ICC) for suspected war crimes."

and

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20231103-israeli-families-bring-war-crime-complaint-to-icc-lawyer)

The change is necessary for accuracy, balance, and neutral point of view.

Apndrew (talk) 06:16, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Ojsyork (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm concerned that many of the articles on lifeboat stations don't meet GNG. After looking at a random sampling of them, most of them cite the Lifeboat Enthusiasts Society (of which Martin states they are a member of on their talk page), which appears to be an WP:SPS, and The Lifeboat, a publication of the RNLI, which is not an independent source. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Voorts I would have thought the same thing when I first encountered these articles, but there are several independent published sources on these lifesaving stations. Whenever I've done a BEFORE search on one, I always find GNG-qualifying sourcing. This came up in an AfD for one of Ojsyork's creations last year (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamburgh Castle Lifeboat Station), which resulted in a "keep". Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

• Needforname (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed.

Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required.

Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

• Ahola .O (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)

(Non-administrator comment) You are currently not adding to the "workload of new page patrollers", in fact, your creations need to be watched closely. Not when I specifically told you here that the pieces you presented to inquire about Bobo Ajudua are thrash and nonsensical and told you to focus elsewhere instead of on an article that has been deleted several times. Yet, you went ahead to create it, and now, it has been deleted again? via AfD. And this? Your creations need to be watched and that is what the NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

• SDGB1217 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

• C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

@C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [13]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

• Mbdfar (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

330+ article creations with zero deletions. Have run into this editor's creations in New Page Review and do not have to do repairs; infoboxes, categories, wikilinks, short descriptions, talk pages, etc. are all in place. This editor does not need to be in the new pages feed. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:23, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• Walco1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

• Max281 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Reason for requesting confirmed rights to edit and correct information on wikipedia Maximus O (talk) 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 19:13, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

• Intrisit (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Your three most recent RMTR requests were all contested. I think that disqualifies you from this permission for a long while. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Um, exactly how long? Because I'll still be involved in RMs and at RMTR! Intrisit (talk) 16:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

• BryceM2001 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

• Ali Beary (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary _{(talk2me!) (stalk me?!)} 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

• TrueMoriarty (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

• Sophisticatedevening (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

• Xiphoid Vigour (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Well, I'm requesting this right to protect Wikipedia from Vandals. By the way the 1 of the 2 revisions (both not accepted) in Curry was unaccepted without any reason and other maybe due to some misunderstanding by the reviewer of the WP:NOINDICSCRIPT & both were good faith.Although I am look as a newcomer, but this is a clean start account. If there is any other objection, I'll try to be explainable for it. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 11 days and has 57 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 00:03, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done You've only had an account for about 11 days, which isn't enough of a track record to demonstrate that you routinely edit. Furthermore, I saw in this edit that you want to become extended confirmed and a template editor "as soon as possible" which gives the impression that you want to collect hats. I don't feel comfortable with granting you this user right at this time. Fathoms Below (talk) 04:54, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Alright, but I'm not collecting hats (to show off). Well I've always wanted to be a template editor & I was extended confirmed in my old account. (4yrs and 1071 edits before I clean started) Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:02, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm sorry if I am offensive. But the point is that I never had,have or will have the intention to collect hats. Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

By "as soon as possible" I meant to fulfill my desire to contribute Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

• please don't think that I'm doing this to change your mind. I'm just removing that show off tag.

Xiphoid Vigour ༈Duel༈ 16:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

• Sundostund (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at PendingChanges, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the criteria for its use, especially in regard to BLP and countering vandalism. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. Additionally, I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions, and finally – as for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 13:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• W.andrea (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

To review changes on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. — W.andrea (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:07, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

• Cmrc23 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

Hello, I was temporarily granted rollback permissions to see how I do, and they are due to expire on the 27th. I believe I have been diligent and careful with this permission, and I only use it when necessary. I always warn users and I create discussions on article talk pages where necessary. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 14:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by Pppery (expires 18:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 14:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

@Cmrc23: It looks like you're using generic rollback even on edits that aren't obvious vandalism (where vandalism is defined as being "deliberately intended to obstruct or defeat the project's purpose, which is to create a free encyclopedia") or other categories of rollback that don't need an explanatory edit summary. For example, while removing a reference might be vandalism, it could also be based on good-faith belief that the source is unreliable. Similarly, this rollback doesn't seem to be of obvious vandalism. Going forward, would you include the reason in the edit summary when reverting any edits that don't fall into one of criteria 1–5 at WP:ROLLBACKUSE? SilverLocust 💬 18:59, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

I was a little hasty with those two in particular, but I will make sure. I presumed my warning on their talk page was enough, but I try to not use it when it's not necessary (again, was hasty there, apologise) Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 19:55, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done. Extended by 1 month. SilverLocust 💬 04:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

• Footballnerd2007 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{( · · · · · · · · · )}

I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements.

Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting.

Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)