Violence against Muslims in independent India was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 11, 2013 Good article nominee Not listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 1, 2013. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the majority of instances of anti-Muslim violence in India have occurred in the northern and western states of India?

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Human rights High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. India High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Sociology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Islam: Islam and Controversy / Muslim history Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force. This article is supported by the Muslim history task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Religion: Interfaith Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive. Discrimination High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Death High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Anthropology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Biology Mid‑importance Violence against Muslims in independent India is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

It is totally misleading and false information and can cause social problems and riots 2409:4060:294:67CA:0:0:98F:8A1 (talk) 07:53, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PLease read wp:afd, you can't ask for an article to be deleted on its talk page. Slatersteven (talk) 09:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page is very misleading in nature. Violence has been perpetrated against Hindus as well or any other religion for that matter. Associating violence with religion fails humanity and further creates divide. Sashwat0707 (talk) 16:28, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How is it misleading, do we say there is only violence against slims please quote where we say that? Slatersteven (talk) 16:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You do understand that by omitting that violence was done against Hindus too, acts in favour of you expressing that only Islam suffered. Please stop hiding behind the words and put in all the fact, if not, then dont put any. 2405:201:D01C:2045:2450:4579:281B:E9B6 (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We don't Persecution of Hindus. Slatersteven (talk) 20:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article totally a propaganda to make hindus a villian. This article talks about riots but only mentions muslim casualties. Moreover , there are many riots initiated by muslims too. In Independent India, the number of death of hindus are more than muslims because of riots initiated by muslims. Western media won't mention that many riots started because of violence done by muslims at start but they will start blaming Hindus when they retaliate. These propagandas have been going on for long. This article is make Hindus look like villains when Hindus are ones who are dying more. They will mention RSS or Other hindu groups but they will never mention muslim groups that are funding terrorism. Recently , Bangladeshi Hindus are suffering too but what is western or arabic media like aljazeera doing. They are making it like it ok. Few years in future, i will another wikipedia article like this where they will mention no hindus or temples were killed or destroyed. Similarly in Raesi , Kashmir, islamist terrorist killed Hindu pilgrims. So, Why would any common innocent man love muslims after all these violence. Why don't you write violence against Hindus in Independent India, Pakistan and Bangladesh in same style? Then i will agree that you are not biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:40E6:3B:E382:34C6:984D:9CA3:F555 (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PLease read wp:afd. Slatersteven (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go: Persecution of Hindus. Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to say this page should be edited as there is lot of hate committed by writing against India's rulling BJP party and RSS , the social working organizations. violence against muslims is attributed to Indian history not by BJP or RSS. please remove the biased writing otherwise strict action would be taken. why you all don't have dare to speak against terrorist organization. Nydv160 (talk) 10:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We go by what reliable sources say. Slatersteven (talk) 11:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven

Let me tell you BJP government came in power after 2013. And all the riots given in the page happened during congress rule. Reliable sources are fake, they just need propaganda to write against BJP rulling party and RSS.

If biased things written against BJP and RSS is not removed then strict action would be taken to delete this page.

why you don't create page on violence against hindus, the ways muslims did Mumbai attack and bombings.

useless muslim appeaser, Nydv160 (talk) 11:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then take these sources to wp:rsn, you do not get to dismiss them, the community can. Slatersteven (talk) 11:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh and Persecution of Hindus. Slatersteven (talk) 11:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven There is already a page persecution of muslims.

there is seperate page of violence against muslims but no seperate page for violence against Hindus.

people opening Wikipedia will get wrong knowledge about hindus and BJP. In history lakhs of more hindus were killed but all organizations in the world follow muslim appeasement policies including Wikipedia. Nydv160 (talk) 11:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What, are you saying that more Hindus were killed in post impendence India than Muslims, source? Slatersteven (talk) 12:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven muslims killed in independence India were nothing against the Hindus they killed in Calcutta, malabar, barisal,noakhali, 1964 east Pakistan riots,1971 operation searchlight Nydv160 (talk) 12:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of those are in post-independence India, so are not relevant to this article. So how many people died, source, not original research, not your assertions, a figure. Slatersteven (talk) 12:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven Can you make a page about violence against Hindus in Independent Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Please I would be so grateful, I can send you information and article. See the statics hindus are brutually killed in Bangladesh. There absolute population is stable since a century in Bangladesh. in west Bengal muslim population increased from 5 million to 2.5 crore of India. Nydv160 (talk) 12:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh is not part of the nation of India, stop conflating different issues, this page is about India, only India, and solely India. If you have sources, saying that more Hindus have been killed (in modern India) than Muslims, [present them here. Slatersteven (talk) 12:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Falsified lnfo, will give rise to communal disharmony.Content should be immediately deleted 2402:8100:25D7:6AC1:0:0:473D:10B (talk) 07:53, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

THis is not how you get articles deleted, you need to wp:afd them, with better reasons than "I do not like it". Slatersteven (talk) 10:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few minor changes in the ledé, which were reverted by @Slatersteven: for the stated reasons: "tHis is about all your edits, not just the description." and "THis was better". I believe my version is more concise and straight to the point; Firstly, there's shouldn't be any short description as the title if self-explanatory. Then, anti-Muslim violence has not only been carried out by Hindu nationalists mobs but by Sikhs and other communities per the infobox; and too many details such as "Over 10,000 people have been killed in Hindu-Muslim communal violence since 1950 in 6,933 instances of communal violence between 1954 and 1982" aren't needed in ledé as the ledé is supposed to be short summary of the entire article. So that is why I moved this from the ledé to the body. Rashidpour Rezanejad 14:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well for one "Over 10,000 people have been killed in Hindu-Muslim communal violence since 1950 ", we do not need to say 10,000 twice. In addition, the short description is to aid in searches, removing it adds nothing. "through the partition in 1947" it not an improvement, though to what? "frequently in the form of violent attacks on Muslims" why was this removed, as it says what it is, vioelence? You also remeoved a source, why? Slatersteven (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I could not say thius in an edit summery. Slatersteven (talk) 14:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Off the top of my head. Slatersteven (talk) 14:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remove any source. I only moved one source from the ledé to the body per MOS:LEADCITE. Short description removal is per WP:SDNONE that states: "some article titles are sufficiently self-explanatory to English language speakers worldwide that a descriptive annotation would not be helpful.". Several featured articles like the List of prime ministers of India do not have any short description. Also, how does adding partition not an improvement? It's quite relevant to the article itself; the first instances of anti-Muslim violence were linked to the partition of 1947. And yes, the 10,000 people being killed should not be twice in the ledé; it should be mentioned once in the ledé and once in the body. Rashidpour Rezanejad 15:57, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was there for a reason, the figure had been challenged as I recall. And the partition text does not make sense, what was it though to? It does not need changing, we have arrived at this after long and torturous discussion. Slatersteven (talk) 16:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But I have sateted my objections its now time for others to chip in. Slatersteven (talk) 16:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Slatersteven that the citation shouldn't be removed - on a page this contentious, we need the citation. As to the rest of the wording, it really depends on whether the source says that 10,000 Muslims were killed, or whether 10,000 people died - I cannot access the source at this moment. Obviously, we need to be saying what the source says. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I comply with the inclusion of citation. Any thoughts on the other edits I made? Rashidpour Rezanejad 18:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My thoughts depend on the content of the citation, as I said: are you able to provide a quote? Vanamonde93 (talk) 18:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the citation does not mention the 10,000 figure. I have it opened. It says: "Aside from the aftermath of the partition, Hindu-Muslim relations in India have been marked by periodic violence and riots. Jabalpur experienced communal riots in 1961, Ahmedabad in 1969, and Bhiwandi-Jalgaon in 1970. The end of the 1970s and early 1980s also witnessed a number of major communal riots. Official figures compiled from several sources, including the Home Ministry, indicate the total number of incidents of communal violence between 1954 and 1982 as 6,933 (Brass 1990, 198)" It just tells both Hindu-Muslim causalities between these years. Rashidpour Rezanejad 18:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I looked through the body, and the ref for the 10,000 figure is from Biggs and Dhattiwala, which does verify the content but is citing another source, Wilkinson's Votes and Violence, 2009. There is no page number, and I lack the time to go through an entire book right now. Biggs and Dhattiwala are discussing overall victims, meaning your version of the lead isn't supported. Vanamonde93 (talk) 19:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]