This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Films / Computer High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). Film: American / Animated This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the American cinema task force. This article is supported by the Animated films task force. United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Video games: Nintendo Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Nintendo task force. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: 北埜トゥーン; つくね伯爵 (2023-04-26). 映画『スーパーマリオ』宮本茂氏インタビュー。約6年かかった制作の裏側、マリオとルイージの設定、次回作など、制作中に刺激を受けたことやこだわりのポイントなども聞いた (in Japanese). Famitsu.

In the Mario Day 2024 YouTube video, Shigeru clearly states the sequel is releasing on April 3, 2026.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=vfjmQlWRHgQ Osb21313 (talk) 20:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will The Super Mario Bros Movie 2 Be Released And What Will It Look Like? Also, what will it be about? 5.81.3.138 (talk) 21:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We know when it's coming out, but that's all we know. See the film's draft page for more info. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 00:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main page summary reads: "Also, the sequel needs to include 8 main characters omitted from this first film." Although it is cited, it reads like opinion and seems inappropriate for the wiki entry, especially the summary section. Please consider removing this sentence. Gcalig (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whereabouts is this mentioned? I've looked at the draft and the draft talk pages, but never is this sentence included. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The source crediting the director's daughter for voicing the Luma doesn't actually mention her. Can someone please fix? 174.89.38.90 (talk) 04:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I wanted to add a citation for one of its awards. The movie received a Movieguide award this year and I wanted to provide a link to the website where this award is listed. https://movieguideawards.com/tag/2024/. Thank you AB12349 (talk) 17:31, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the Plot section of this article, please edit the following sentence: "Peach then shrinks Bowser with a Blue Mushroom and imprisons him." So it will how read: "Peach then shrinks Bowser with a Blue Mushroom and Toad imprisons him in a jar." Christianhatley527 (talk) 08:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit has been made. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 10:08, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

remove the r link to mushroom kingdom in plot it is unnecessary 119.234.10.211 (talk) 23:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Super Mario Bros. Movie/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Yovt (talk · contribs) 21:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 06:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I will be reviewing this article, expect the initial remarks soon! Vestrian24Bio 06:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yovt: you have only made 22 edits to the page and you asked another user to backup your nom, but they (SleepDeprivedGinger) have done only 17 edits to this page. Neither of you don't even appear on the Top 50 authors list, thus I'm failing this nomination. Vestrian24Bio 06:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yovt: I have re-opened the review now as you requested at my talkpage. I will continue the review. Vestrian24Bio 03:18, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Yovt:

• EARWIG shows 56.4% - possible violations.
• According to link-dispenser,
  • 5 refs need an archive link.
  • 1 ref that could be down doesn't have an archive link.
• Remove Box Office Mojo, Rotten tomatoes and Metacritic links from "External links" section, as they could be used as inline citation. Done
• Are refs 16, 38, 47, 56, 92, 94, 106, 107, 125 and 134 reliable?
• Remove the "See also" section. Done

Vestrian24Bio 03:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Refs show up as marginally reliable by WP:RSP; will look into them individually. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 17:10, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• No need for the link to 1986 film, as it has a distinctive title. Done
• Link L.A. Live in the lead. Done
• Mention film's runtime somewhere in the "Release" section. Done
• Remove refs 1, 2 from infobox. Done
• It should be List of Mario franchise characters in the "Voice cast" section hatnote. Done

Vestrian24Bio 13:34, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• No need for the Golden Globes ref in the lead. Done
• Link publishers in all refs (wherever applicable).
• In the voice cast section, only a description should be given, no need to repeat plot points. Done Also, no need for ref 6 throughout the list. Done
• Isn't there a relevant link for Jungle Kingdom, Magikoopa, Penguin King and Snow Kingdom...Doesn't seem to be the case; Magikoopa and Kamek have the same target
• "the teaser formally revealed the film's title, The Super Mario Bros. Movie." - add a source here. Done
• Align directors' image to the left side. Done
• No need for refs on image captions / footer text. Done
• "portrayal in the Mario Kart games" - add a source here at the end of the paragraph. Done
• "credited' head of story Ed Skudder with storyboarding" - what does 'credited' means here?Replaced with "elected"
• Link L.A. Live in the Release section. Done
• "In celebration of World Intellectual Property Day 2023, a movie screening of The Super Mario Bros. Movie took place on April 28" - should be mentioned in the prose somewhere. Doneish
• Format the last part as following,

== References ==
=== Notes ===
{{notelist}}
=== Citations ===
{{reflist}}
== External links ==

 Done

Vestrian24Bio 10:33, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Vestrian24Bio, these comments have been addressed, though I will note the linking to publisher will take some time. Any more comments would be greatly appreciated, thank you. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 15:29, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Add alt texts for the images. Done
• No need for the first note on infobox. Done
• No need for formatting in alt texts. Done
• Link publishers in all citations.
• Could have more citations on the "Internet leak" section. Done
• Third sentence of the "Box office" section should be re-written as, It also became the first film based on a video game to gross $1 billion worldwide,<ref> the highest-grossing animated film of 2023,<ref> and the second highest-grossing film of 2023 after Barbie.<ref> Done
• MOS:FILMBOXOFFICE says to avoid terminology such as "domestic", "international" and "North America".
• "initially projected to gross roughly $125 million from 4,025 theaters in its five-day opening weekend. It was also expected to gross roughly $100 million internationally" - contradicting figures.Removed
• "After making $31.7 million on its first day and $26.5 million on its second, five-day estimates were raised to $141 million. Projections were re-adjusted yet again to $191 million after the film made $55 million on Friday. The film went on to debut to $146.4 million during the traditional three-day weekend and $204.6 million over the five-day frame" - condense this sentence, no need for a day-by-day statement. Done
• " its $190.8 million lifetime gross to become the top-grossing video game adaptation ever" - domestic or international?Has been removed
• No need to list Transformers, Minions, Quantumani - article's about this movie only. Also, Sonic the Hedgehog 2 seems over-detailed here. Done
• Same for the second paragraph. DoneThough Frozen 2 is a bit more important that it'll stay unless ordered otherwise
• The entire "Domestic" section seems to be over-detailed.Your comments diluted its detail, please advise if not enough
• The "Other territories" section should be re-written. Done
• First 3 refs are enough after "mixed reviews from critics". Done

Vestrian24Bio 11:32, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Add the year after "On October 6" in the first sentence of marketing. Done
• No need for the year 2023 in the last paragraph. Done
• Twitter account name is not necessary here. Done
• Remove "and as such became the highest-grossing film of 2023." Done
• "over-performed in other territories" - ?
• Remove the decline percentages, just the gross figures are enough. Done
• No need to link the countries - WP:GEOLINK. Done
• "In its fourth weekend, it added $68.3 million from 80 territories, including a $14.3 million debut in Japan—the highest opening for an animated studio film in the country" - source?Added
• Link Spider-Man: No Way Home. Done
• The Original Nintendo themes note is missing a full stop and a ref.I assume the full stop to be a punctuation "."
• "as many Nintendos as Nintendon'ts" -- ?? should have a [sic]. Done
• Should rewrite the CinemaScore and PostTrak sentence more clearly. Done
• The "Critical response" section is also over-detailed, a one-sentence summary/highlight of each review is enough. Done
• Link Cinematic Box Office Achievement in the lead. Done
• Add a KCA winners ref.
• According to MOS:FILMACCOLADES, "Awards included in lists should have a Wikipedia article to demonstrate notability", so remove HPA, GAFCA, SCL from the article.
• Check the date on Movieguide Awards.
• Link 2024 Movieguide Awards and Movieguide Award for Best Movie for Families. Done
• It's MTV MIAW Awards, not millennial since 2016. Done

@Yovt: that's all. Vestrian24Bio 11:08, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The Mario movie is the 5th biggest film not the 3rd 82.28.205.70 (talk) 21:09, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done It became the 3rd highest during its run. The other two films that moved ahead of it were released over a year later.

ThomasO1989 (talk) 21:39, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]