Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 23:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 21:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stay tuned.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• "The game made a few changes to gameplay, such as the introduction of new techniques, and made various changes to the composition of some teams, with a few of them introducing new characters". Isn't too vague, with all these various, some etc?
  • Revised.
• "and with which Iori is connected by sharing a similar fighting style due to his predecessor's curse". Can you explain it better?
  • Expanded
• "Many people attended the word-of-mouth tests". Ditto.
  • Expanded
• Too many "was", "were", et simila in Release and Related media. Try to rewrite all of them.
• "only in Japan,." There's a superfluous comma.
  • Done.

@Tintor2: Nothing to say about Reception.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 21:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC) @TeenAngels1234: Tried revising everything. Thanks for the feedback.Tintor2 (talk) 21:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Good job.