The Guardian was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh Festival Fringe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Edinburgh Festival FringeWikipedia:WikiProject Edinburgh Festival FringeTemplate:WikiProject Edinburgh Festival FringeEdinburgh Festival Fringe
In 2022, British journalist Lucy Siegle criticized The Guardian, the Guardian Media Group and the broader media for perpetuating an "omerta" — a code of silence — surrounding workplace harassment, particularly in their own institutions. Siegle, one of six women, who experienced sexual harassment by journalist Nick Cohen during her time at The Guardian, highlighted how media organizations often fail to properly address such misconduct. Barrister Jolyon Maugham KC echoed her concerns about the media's reluctance to examine and report on sexual harassment in their own institutions and called for this damaging silence to end: “The shameful, if mutually convenient, omerta on the reporting of sexual misconduct within the media sacrifices the careers and dignity of young women to the convenience of predatory older men. It must not continue”.[1] In May 2023, The New York Times reported that Roula Khalaf prevented the publishing of a Financial Times article covering sexual misconduct allegations against Nick Cohen.[2]Agoraagoras (talk) 00:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request 27 October 2024 - anti-trans position
Either in the controversy section or the political stance section, please add a sentence noting The Guardian's anti-trans position. Here are a few references:
Reversion of Sourced Content on Allegations Against The Guardian
I recently added content to this article about allegations of antisemitic reporting by The Guardian, which were accompanied by credible references. Specifically, the content highlighted accusations made in August 2024, where The Guardian was accused of publishing antisemitic "blood libels" on at least three occasions, including comparisons of Israel to Nazi Germany. Additionally, it was alleged that the publication's coverage of the 7 October Hamas-led attack on Israel was both "pro-Hamas" and "antisemitic."
I ensured that the information was neutral and accurately cited, adhering to Wikipedia's content policies. I would like to understand if there was an issue with the neutrality, reliability of sources, or any other aspect. I am open to feedback and willing to revise the content to align with Wikipedia's guidelines.
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page The Guardian. If possible, please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. If you cannot edit the article's talk page, you can instead make your request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for edits to a protected page. kemel49(connect)(contri) 01:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)