This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm This article is supported by the American cinema task force. United States: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force. Library of Congress Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jaqua04.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The theme song was used as a walk up song for MLB HOFer Lou Brock 2600:1700:1FF4:4CF0:34AE:8B9A:ABE8:EED1 (talk) 04:09, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if I'm doing this wrong, I've never done this before, but this factoid has been debunked as an urban legend, so why's it here? Citation: https://legendsrevealed.com/entertainment/2016/07/29/was-shaft-nearly-played-by-a-white-actor-in-the-first-shaft-film/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.50.202.227 (talk) 03:45, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vic echoes the girl's spat to Shaft, while he leaves, not while he comes in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.128.197.77 (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please enrich "many debate whether it actually falls under the category of blaxploitation itself" to provide details on why there is this conflict, or at least a link to a films forum discussing it. Alvis 04:25, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a debated term that is used by those critical of the film, should the very first sentence of the article be so casually refering "shaft is a blaxploitation film from the...." Etc? Seems like this should be written from a more NPOV, with the topic of whether it is "blaxploitation" relegated to its own section later in the article? I'm going to delete this from the summary for the time being. :96.41.68.81 (talk) 08:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to update this section completely- by talking about race in specific. -Jaqua04 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaqua04 (talk • contribs) 11:00, May 26, 2016 (UTC)

This page was moved from "Shaft (1971 movie)" to "Shaft (1971 film)" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) – Ianblair23 22:31, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the Wikiquote entry's name wasn't changed from movie to film, so the link was pointing to a nonexistent page. I've fixed this (as far as I can tell). Naar 22:15, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just been watching it. Call me a pedant if you want, but the way that the friction knot was rigged onto the abseil rope while setting up the hotel assault ... bad, very bad. It is possible to rig up like that using an Italian Hitch on a karabiner, but the actor fumbled and only put two turns of rope around the karabiner. Go the the back of the class, Mr Stunt Double, and more importantly plummet to the ground screaming then die.

Are "bloopers" a part of the normal Wikipedia movie description?

A Karley 00:05, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Shaft Movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:47, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miscegenation

When "SHAFT" was released in 1971, one of the things that caused a frisson and made it a sensation was that the woman he casually picks up at the Greenwich Village bar was Caucasian. This had never been seen before in American cinema. It was something for which a black man could have been easily lynched or imprisoned for in the South just 10 years earlier. "SHAFT", while not the best movie ever, definitely is a culturally significant movie for many reasons.Johncheverly (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2013 (UTC)User:JCHeverly 19:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you talking about Misogyny? If so, I am planning to update a section on how masculinity, sexuality, and misogyny are a part of this film. -jaqua04 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaqua04 (talk • contribs) 11:00, May 26, 2016 (UTC)

No, he is clearly talking about miscegenation. --EnOreg (talk) 14:23, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am actually surprised there isn't already a Shaft film series page. With four films, a fifth on the way, and a TV series spin-off...this definitely needs to be made. Who's going to make the draft for the rest of us to read?.--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 06:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, Isaac Hayes was by far the best reason for this movie to exist. But it's ridiculous to spam the article with links to his name and reprints of his name. One link per person is enough, and only for notable people. (Hayes is absolutely notable, but not 50x more than anyone else in the world. :) ) TooManyFingers (talk) 07:14, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]