This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Video games: Nintendo Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Nintendo task force. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Pokémon High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. 2010s Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.dicebreaker.com/games/pokemon-trading-card-game/opinion/pokemon-tcg-online-perfect-for-learning

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pokémon TCG Online/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Namcokid47 (talk · contribs) 02:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

After looking over this article, I'm gonna have to instantly fail this. The page is poorly-made and easily fails the Good Article criteria, explained below:

• Almost all references used come from questionable links or are primary
• Lack of a gameplay screenshot
• Lack of a development section
• Lack of any reviews, aside from MetaCritic and a brief GamesRadar+ review
• Very little of the gameplay is sourced

Once these issues have been addressed, you are free to nominate it again. Namcokid47 ^(Contribs) 02:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See here More than 7 days no one have come up to oppsoe some changes this page. So i am moving forward Regice2020 (talk) 05:36, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]