This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Spain This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

@The Royal Herald: This article cites three times a website (currently reference [2]) that violates WP:CIRCULAR, see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Observervoice.com. Most uses of this website on Wikipedia were added by a single spammer and are easy to excise, but this is more integrated into the article. Since you seem to have been working on the article quite actively, perhaps you could figure out the best way to resolve this situation? 100.36.106.199 (talk) 21:35, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the issue has been resolved. Thank you! The Royal Herald (talk) 21:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Royal Herald, thanks but I don't think that resolved the issue – the source itself is quite problematic, it should not be used on Wikipedia because of WP:CIRCULAR (see the discussion here). The issue you fixed (the duplication of a citation) seems unrelated. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 00:17, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the citation. I have replaced it with a different one. Has this resolved the issue? The Royal Herald (talk) 00:21, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]