This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Italy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wait why y'all put Latin separately?? -GogoLion (talk) 05:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am proposing to merge both the Praenestinian language and the Lanuvian language into the Latino-Faliscan languages. I believe there isn't enough information in both pages to warrant them both having their own articles, and it would be better if these languages would have their parts in the Latino-Faliscan languages page. Thank You. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 04:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge I don't see much problems with merging. KOLANO12 3 13:21, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]