This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

England Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Football: England Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

recent history should be changed to this: have it so there is a paragraph called steve mcclaren and then another paragraph underneath with fabio capello and the present. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.55.157 (talk) 00:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have just corrected the article's incorrect statement that no football was played in England during World War II (see Category:Wartime football (soccer)), and provided information from Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation as a reference. Since the wartime and victory internationals were unofficial, it would possibly be better if the details of these matches were placed in separate articles with a shorter mention of them in this article. Coyets (talk) 11:59, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The category 'Wartime football (soccer)' has been moved to Category:Wartime association football in line with a general Wikipedia naming improvement. Coyets (talk) 14:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a chunk missing. There's a paragraph that ends with the Second World War, then the next paragraph starts "Ramsey's prediction came true" and goes on to talk about 1966. The 1950s and early 1960s appear to be missing entirely, presumably covered in the missing paragraph that previously told us who Ramsey is and what he predicted. (I mean, I know what's being referred to, but that's not the point.) Brickie (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The section was removed by a vandal here and never restored. I've now done so.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 02:34, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe should have a section on its playing style as I believe there is enough analysis for it to be a subsection in the main article what are any elses thoughts.Dwanyewest (talk) 01:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.sbnation.com/soccer/2013/9/5/4696672/england-national-team-world-cup-qualifying-uefa http://keepingscore.blogs.time.com/2012/04/02/no-england-did-not-invent-football-soccer-as-we-know-it/ http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/27/sport/football/football-euro-england-warrior/index.html http://www.worldsoccer.com/columnists/england-has-always-provided-a-home-for-long-ball-football http://www.nytimes.com/1993/11/24/sports/24iht-rob_1.html http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/kevin-garside-only-narrow-thinking-keeps-england-so-dull-7834875.html http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/13/sports/soccer/englands-soccer-players-lag-behind-european-peers.html?_r=0

This refers to the men's game. It should either be titled 'Men's national team' and/or information added about the other national team

The Lionesses are one of two national teams. Women were actively excluded from the game from the 20s.

Several edits are called for. 2A00:23C5:E138:1A01:3C24:4D24:D235:ADE6 (talk) 12:43, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]