This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Finance & Investment Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Private Equity This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Private Equity, a collaborative effort to improve the depth of quality and coverage of the private equity and venture capital industry and related topics in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. This project seeks to collaborate with the following WikiProjects: WikiProject Finance & Investment WikiProject Companies WikiProject Biography Private EquityWikipedia:WikiProject Private EquityTemplate:WikiProject Private EquityPrivate Equity

Did some work on this page. I believe the tag can come down now. What do you think?Jiminycricket55 (talk) 12:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi wiki editors, I am anxious to get this article up to the standards of a decent wikipedia article. Please advise what can be done to allay the fears that someone "close to the source" made a large number of edits, and that "original research" was done- since just about every statement has a decent source. Please help me to make this the best article it can be. As for the notability standard, judging by the number of articles that exist about this company and the special role it plays in the development of the Chinese economy, I do believe it is wiki-worthy.Jiminycricket55 (talk) 06:57, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since I have not heard from the editor who placed the tag about ideas for improving this wiki so that the tag can be removed, I will make the changes to the best of my ability. I am going to focus on the "investment philosophy" section.Jiminycricket55 (talk) 10:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My name is Phil and I work for The Foote Group, a PR agency for Hillhouse. In compliance with WP:COI, I'd like to request several changes on Hillhouse's behalf for an impartial editor to consider. Please see below the requested edits. Let me know if you have any concerns.

Thank you for taking the time to review and respond to the requested changes. Best regards. Phil2600 (talk) 18:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'd like to request a few additional changes to the page for consideration by an impartial editor. These are all minor edits to add where companies are based or clarify their size/origins. Additions are indicated in bold:

• "As of 2020, Hillhouse was an investor in companies such as the Southeast Asia company Airwallex"
• "In 2022, it invested in Indonesia-based J&T Express, a delivery company"
• "Domestic Appliance business of Philips" -> “global domestic appliances business from Dutch conglomerate Philips”
• "one of the largest women's Chinese footwear companyies in the world, Belle International Holdings Ltd"

Thank you in advance for whoever takes the time to consider the edits. Pinging @Hzh: who responded to some of my prior requests above. Best regards. Phil2600 (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide sources for the edits, the existing sources don't necessarily provided the information. Hzh (talk) 10:08, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article makes the claim that Hillhouse is the largest private equity firm operating in Asia as of 2021, citing this October 2021 article by Reuters: Wu, Kane (28 October 2021). "Hong Kong's PAG seeking to raise $9 bln with new buyout fund". Reuters.. The apparently relevant sentence in the Reuters article says "Hillhouse Capital raised $18 billion in the region's largest fund in August, a few months after KKR & Co Inc (KKR.N) raised $15 billion for its fourth pan-Asia fund, the data showed." I'm not sure how to interpret that sentence. I think the sentence could be saying one of two different things:

• That Hillhouse Capital is the region's largest fund, and it recently raised $18 billion, or
• That the $18 billion raised by Hillhouse Capital is the largest amount that had been raised in a single funding round for private equity funds in Asia, comparing that $18 billion to the recent $15 billion raised by KKR (without meaning to describe the overall size of Hillhouse's total portfolio).

Which is it? (or perhaps both?)

—⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 15:43, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Reuters article doesn't say that it is the largest private equity firm operating in Asia, so that needs to be removed unless a new source is provided. Hzh (talk) 10:32, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]