This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Enforcement Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because reports produced in an official capacity by the US Department of Justice, which I will build on and modify quite soon, are not copyrighted. Also, the bulk of the copied text is simply laundry lists of the nature of the sensitive or classified materials which were reported stolen in the government charging document, they don't need to be placed in quotes, they are mere facts of the case which are generally conveyed to readers in a list. I have now added the US Government Source disclaimer. -Abovfold (talk) 00:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]