Talk:George A. Mitchell/GA1
GA Review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: JPxG (talk · contribs) 22:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- I'll do my best! jp×g 22:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio
- Earwig's detector brings up nothing.
Stability
- Article has been stable for its entire history.
POV
- Article does not have any bias or agenda that I can see.
Media
- All images are freely licensed, clearly illustrative, etc.
- What is going on here? This image should not have the text superimposed on it. Can you upload a clean version?
- Done --Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Focus / scope / coverage / completeness
- Article stays focused on Mitchell and his exploits. Covers his life and his goings-on fairly thoroughly.
Prose / MoS / ref check
- I have edited some references and moved some around; a few sentences were not supported by the supplied inline citations. Will continue to do this as I work through the article.
- Added some stuff from the Clam Lake Canal article (as well as a ref).
- Added the Wheeler ref to some places where it supported content.
-
1885 and 1895
Huh? Done Re-incorporated in 1885 and 1895 citation provided.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- General copyediting which I'm doing.
- Refs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 are good.
- Refs 8, 9, 10, 11 are good.
- Crawford 1913 should show the specific essay that it's quoting from (I assume this is Some Men Who Have Made Cadillac by Jean McGee?) because there are numerous Page 13's in that book. Done provided link for "father of Cadillac" page 13 in source Crawford 1913
- Ref 14 (Bulletin by Illinois Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage) looks like a duplicate of Crawford 1913. Is this the case? Done Good catch. Removed Ref #14.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Ref 15 seems good.
- Can't find the thing in Ref 16 (Record 1895) about Mitchell being a Republican (wrong page number?) Done Page 152 is correct. It can be found in the left column about one-third of the way down.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Refs 17, 18 are good.
- Ref 19 title fixed.
- Ref 20 is good.
Conclusion
- @Doug Coldwell: This one looks good, looking forward to passing after these couple things are good. jp×g 01:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- @JPxG: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Doug Coldwell: Dope! Passing now. jp×g 03:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)