Eisspeedway

Talk:George A. Mitchell

Former good articleGeorge A. Mitchell was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 27, 2021Good article nomineeListed
February 26, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 25, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that George A. Mitchell has been called the father of Cadillac?
Current status: Delisted good article


GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:George A. Mitchell/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: JPxG (talk · contribs) 22:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do my best! jp×g 22:57, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

  • checkY Earwig's detector brings up nothing.

Stability

  • checkY Article has been stable for its entire history.

POV

  • checkY Article does not have any bias or agenda that I can see.

Media

  • checkY All images are freely licensed, clearly illustrative, etc.
  • ☒N What is going on here? This image should not have the text superimposed on it. Can you upload a clean version?

Focus / scope / coverage / completeness

  • checkY Article stays focused on Mitchell and his exploits. Covers his life and his goings-on fairly thoroughly.

Prose / MoS / ref check

  • exclamation mark  I have edited some references and moved some around; a few sentences were not supported by the supplied inline citations. Will continue to do this as I work through the article.
  • checkY Added some stuff from the Clam Lake Canal article (as well as a ref).
  • checkY Added the Wheeler ref to some places where it supported content.
  • ☒N 1885 and 1895 Huh?  Done Re-incorporated in 1885 and 1895 citation provided.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:18, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • checkY General copyediting which I'm doing.
  • checkY Refs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 are good.
  • checkY Refs 8, 9, 10, 11 are good.
  • ☒N Crawford 1913 should show the specific essay that it's quoting from (I assume this is Some Men Who Have Made Cadillac by Jean McGee?) because there are numerous Page 13's in that book.  Done provided link for "father of Cadillac" page 13 in source Crawford 1913
  • ☒N Ref 14 (Bulletin by Illinois Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage) looks like a duplicate of Crawford 1913. Is this the case?  Done Good catch. Removed Ref #14.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • checkY Ref 15 seems good.
  • ☒N Can't find the thing in Ref 16 (Record 1895) about Mitchell being a Republican (wrong page number?) Done Page 152 is correct. It can be found in the left column about one-third of the way down.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • checkY Refs 17, 18 are good.
  • checkY Ref 19 title fixed.
  • checkY Ref 20 is good.

Conclusion

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]