Eisspeedway

Talk:Free University of Berlin

Name of article: Freie Universität Berlin/Free University of Berlin

The German name seems to be more common used. Google: Searched the web for "Freie Universität Berlin". Results: 159,000 (39,400 searching English pages only), Searched the web for "Free University of Berlin". Results: 28,100 (25,900)

not sure about the student figures given for 1980s and 1990s; there was (still is?) a discrepancy between the nominal number of "student places" and the actual number of students enrolled; during the 1990s there were still more than 60,000 students, but about 40,000 official places; this number has been cut (several times?), and I think the absolute number of students has also begun to drop.Ianb 07:17, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Wat does the "Free" stand for? Perhaps Free as in Inquiry (like the Vrije Universiteit Brussel) or Free as in Protestantism (like the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.188.79.203 (talk) 14:53, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

>It was meant to distinguish the "Free University" from what is now the Humboldt University, then simply the University of Berlin, which was located in communist East Berlin. So "free" was mostly of geopolitical significance. Cjs2111 21:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Freie University indeed regards "Freie" (=Free) as part of its name and therefore never translates it into any language, neither in correspondance nor for student or academic exchange programms. And yes the adjective free relates to the time of the wall, in calling themselves free the founders of the universtity silently made it clear that - in their eyes - humbold university (in the eastern part) was to be considered the unfree University. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.188.21.37 (talk) 09:50, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Free university of Berlin is the wrong title, as a name "Freie Universitaet Berlin" should not been translated. A Free univerity is a univerity where everybody -without any grade- is able to study, not so at FU Berlin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.45.168.143 (talk) 08:58, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The word Freie (engl. "free") was used in the name, when the university was founded in 1948, to distinguish it from the old University of Berlin (which later became the Humboldt University), that being located in East Berlin had been taken over by the communists and was no longer free - either academically or politically.

I work at the FUB and we never translate the name "Freie Universität Berlin" into another language. The English language version of the website uses only the name "Freie Universität Berlin", never Free University. Also, when corresponding with international contacts, I have only ever used the name "Freie Universität Berlin". DE481889 19:16, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Berlin National Schools for Transnational Studies should be added in some secotions. I added it here, but, well... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.113.225 (talk) 00:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Objectivity concerns

There is so much self-promoting, unobjective bullshit obviously written by the university it doesn't read like an encyclopedia article at all. Also, WTF is a "top-university". Garbage. YusufAlBinVeryNaughty (talk) 10:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, read this and tell me it has not been composed by some junior corporate relations douchebag "Freie Universität Berlin is one of the leading research universities in Germany and distinguishes itself through its modern and international character." Ahahahahahaha YusufAlBinVeryNaughty (talk) 10:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, also it is not giving sources when stating improvements after a "revamping" under History. Since this is after mentioning a reduction in students it would be interesting to know if improvements where mostly due to said reduction rather than policy. Feels ambigous Cantot (talk) 11:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move (2011)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Free University of Berlin → Freie Universität Berlin – As already discussed here, Freie Universität does not translate its name but rather uses "Freie Universität Berlin" for its foreign language communication as well. This seems to be in accordance with how other names are treated in English in general. Neoryt (talk) 11:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 13 October 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure)  — Amakuru (talk) 17:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Free University of Berlin → Freie Universität Berlin – The university itself uses exclusively the untranslated name on its English language website and in foreign language correspondence. Furthermore, there is no evidence that English language sources use a translated version of the name in equal quantity to the real name. Google.com shows 2.5 million hits for "Freie Universität Berlin" whereas only 400k hits for "Free University of Berlin". DE481889 (talk) 18:46, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. WP does not generally use the official name as the title, unless it is also the most commonly used name. Here, it's pretty clear that the English translation is used much more often in English-language reliable sources. Look at this ngram comparing "the Free University of Berlin" with "the Freie Universität Berlin"+"the Freie Universitat Berlin" - the English translation gets over 70% of the results. (Note: ngrams are now seven years out-of-date, and the trend in this one favors increasing use of the German name. However, given that fourteen years ago, the English name was used 80% of the time, and that seven years ago it was used 70% of the time, it is reasonable to assume that current usage remains well above 50%.) The German name is not unknown in English reliable sources, but we should go with the name most sources use. Dohn joe (talk) 16:56, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: per above and the oppose rationales from the 2011 discussion. The usage of the German name in English-language press would have to be much more dominant than it is in order to justify not using the translation. Vrac (talk) 17:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose WP:UE This is English Wikipedia, use English. WP:OFFICIALNAME we do not use official names just because it is official, we use common names. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:08, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm agreeing with common name over official name. But regarding the Ngram, which seems to be the only evidence supporting the translated name as the "common name": I could be wrong, but doesn't Google Books scrawl only books? And isn't that only a tiny slice of overall usage? Should not the overall English language Google results count instead of the Google Books results? DE481889 (talk) 22:59, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Google Books collects a wide variety of print material - books, journals, etc. And by and large, its sources are much more WP:RELIABLESOURCES than what you find in a Google search. Dohn joe (talk) 02:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But do the guidelines regarding 'reliable sources' really apply here? Because the question isn't verification of a particular fact, but determining how much one name or another is used in all English language conversation around the world. Isn't a broader method like a Google search of all English language sources exactly what you would want for that? DE481889 (talk) 13:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It might if that were the standard. But it isn't - WP:AT says that we base our titling decisions on reliable sources, not on conversational usage. WP:COMMONNAME in particular says that a half dozen times. So that's why a Google Books search is much better than a regular Google search for this question. Dohn joe (talk) 21:26, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Free University of Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Free University of Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Free University of Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Free University of Berlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 June 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Mdewman6 (talk) 23:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Free University of Berlin → Freie Universität Berlin – The university still exclusively uses its German name in English documents, there is no reason for this translation. Evidence for the globally preferred use of the German name can be found on Google trends. The literal translation of "Freie" to "Free" is inappropriate, even if it has been picked up by the press in the past. BrynMawr1965 (talk) 14:13, 30 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 20:16, 7 July 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 03:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. What the marketing department of the university itself decides to use is not the criteria, but how it is referred to in English-language sources, per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:USEENGLISH. As far as I can tell, most sources use "Free University of Berlin". e.g. Britannica, US News, Times Higher Education, etc. Walrasiad (talk) 16:29, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose per Walrasiad, who cited some of the best-known authorities for university rankings. Also see the ARWU. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. Entirely correct. Usually seen untranslated. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relisting comment: Supporters argue that the literal translation of "Freie" to "Free" is inappropriate, while opposers argue that the current title is the common name of the university. Wikiexplorationandhelping (talk) 20:16, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Use in the media and ranking websites is divided. The most commonly referred to ranking, QS Universities Ranking, lists the German name.
    Use by the general public, as I invite everyone to compare general search numbers of both the English and German name results on Google Trends, prefers the original, German name.
    Finally, Berlin’s Freie Universität is not the only university that would translate to “Free University”, however it is the only one to use this translation in its English Wikipedia article title. Hence, “Université libre de Bruxelles”, “Vrije Universiteit Brussel” and “Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam” are all listed on Wikipedia EN with their actual names, with the English translation following at the beginning of each article (“also: Free University of…”). This is what I would propose for Freie Universität Berlin as well. BrynMawr1965 (talk) 13:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WP:USEENGLISH. There is enough evidence provided for the English name to remain the title. Rreagan007 (talk) 00:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Since 2011, the German has been the more common name in English books according to Google Ngrams. (Before then, there were also a lot of "Universitat" results without the ä diacritic.) {{replyto|SilverLocust}} (talk) 03:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment: One last try... CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 03:02, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Germany has been notified of this discussion. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 03:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Higher education has been notified of this discussion. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 03:03, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Free_University_of_Berlin