This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Creationism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CreationismWikipedia:WikiProject CreationismTemplate:WikiProject CreationismCreationism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Astronomy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

/Archive 1 Up to December 2005 2006 2007–2008 2009–2014 2014–

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

I was brought here from the page for Averroes, who argued for a fine tuned universe based on the properties of Earth, as a teleologic proof of God. (Plenty of water, rivers, temperature, etc.) Others in the past have used the physical chemistry of water as evidence. (High melting point, freezing point, and the density of ice, as well as its overall abundance.)

I propose we should merge the Fine-tuning (physics) article into this one. Uwsi (talk) 13:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Puddle thinking has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 26 § Puddle thinking until a consensus is reached. Tea2min (talk) 09:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same way that there is a link to God of the Gaps. I know Wikipedia mods don't like it when science is 'challenged' so I chose to write this in the Talk section first. Wokspoon (talk) 16:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why? What is the connection? The connection to God of the Gaps is clear. --Hob Gadling (talk) 10:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]