Danton-class battleship has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria . If you can improve it further, please do so . If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it .Danton-class battleship is part of the Battleships of France series , a good topic . This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community . If you can update or improve it, please do so .Article milestones Date Process Result February 8, 2014 Good article nominee Listed August 25, 2020 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks . To use this banner, please see the full instructions .Military history Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history Template:WikiProject Military history military history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships , a project to improve all Ship -related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project , or contribute to the project discussion . All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions .Ships Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships Template:WikiProject Ships Ships
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.France Wikipedia:WikiProject France Template:WikiProject France France Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale .
This review is transcluded from Talk:Danton-class battleship/GA1 . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 13:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC) [ reply ]
Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk )
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 13:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC) [ reply ]
1: Well-written
Done
2: Verifiable with no original research
Done
Check for WP:RS : Done
Cross-checked with other FAs: HMS Lion (1910) , HMAS Australia (1911) , Sovetsky Soyuz class battleship , Japanese aircraft carrier Kaga , Russian battleship Slava , Courageous class battlecruiser , SMS Goeben , HMS Indefatigable (1909) , Japanese aircraft carrier Hōshō , USS New Ironsides , HMS Hood (51) , HMS Princess Royal (1911) , HMS Eagle (1918) , HMS Courageous (50) , USS Arizona (BB-39) , HMS New Zealand (1911) , Japanese aircraft carrier Akagi , HMS Queen Mary , HMS Vanguard (23) , Courageous class aircraft carrier , HMS Agincourt , HMS Hermes (95) , HMS Furious (47) , USS Lexington (CV-2) , HMS Argus (I49) , HMS Tiger (1913) , Russian battleship Rostislav , Fusō-class battleship , Japanese battleship Fusō , Japanese battleship Yamashiro , USS Saratoga (CV-3) , Conte di Cavour-class battleship , Japanese battleship Musashi , HMS Warrior (1860) , Tosa-class battleship , Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū , Japanese aircraft carrier Shinano , Japanese battleship Mutsu , Japanese battleship Asahi , Japanese aircraft carrier Ryūjō , Russian battleship Retvizan
Check for the material (WP:RSVETTING ): (contentious ) Done
Is it contentious?: Yes
Does the ref indeed support the material?:
Check for the author (WP:RSVETTING ): Done
Who is the author?:
Does the author have a Wikipedia article?:
What are the author's academic credentials and professional experience?:
What else has the author published?:
Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works?:
Check for the publication (WP:RSVETTING ): Done
Check for Self-published sources (WP:SPS ):
Done
Check for primary sources (WP:PRIMARY ): Done
Check for synthesis (WP:SYN ): Done
Check for original images (WP:OI ): Done
3: Broad in its coverage
Done
Cross-checked with other FAs: HMS Lion (1910) , HMAS Australia (1911) , Sovetsky Soyuz class battleship , Japanese aircraft carrier Kaga , Russian battleship Slava , Courageous class battlecruiser , SMS Goeben , HMS Indefatigable (1909) , Japanese aircraft carrier Hōshō , USS New Ironsides , HMS Hood (51) , HMS Princess Royal (1911) , HMS Eagle (1918) , HMS Courageous (50) , USS Arizona (BB-39) , HMS New Zealand (1911) , Japanese aircraft carrier Akagi , HMS Queen Mary , HMS Vanguard (23) , Courageous class aircraft carrier , HMS Agincourt , HMS Hermes (95) , HMS Furious (47) , USS Lexington (CV-2) , HMS Argus (I49) , HMS Tiger (1913) , Russian battleship Rostislav , Fusō-class battleship , Japanese battleship Fusō , Japanese battleship Yamashiro , USS Saratoga (CV-3) , Conte di Cavour-class battleship , Japanese battleship Musashi , HMS Warrior (1860) , Tosa-class battleship , Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū , Japanese aircraft carrier Shinano , Japanese battleship Mutsu , Japanese battleship Asahi , Japanese aircraft carrier Ryūjō , Russian battleship Retvizan
Check for Article scope as defined by reliable sources :
Check for The extent of the subject matter in these RS :
Check for Out of scope :
Check for The range of material that belongs in the article :
Check for All material that is notable is covered :
Check for All material that is referenced is covered :
Check for All material that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope is covered :
Check for The most general scope that summarises essentially all knowledge :
Check for Stay on topic and no wandering off-topic (WP:OFFTOPIC ):
4: Neutral
5: Stable: No edit wars , etc: Yes
6: Images Done (PD )
I'm glad to see your work here. As per the above checklist there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA.
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 02:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [ reply ]
Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk ) 03:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC) [ reply ]