Eisspeedway

Talk:Conservatism in Canada

Moved in

Now that Conservatism in North America has been split into American conservatism and Canadian conservatism, the following material from the former article obviously belongs here. I think it already is here, but I am not familiar enough with Canadian conservatism to judge. Therefore, before deleting it from the American conservatism article, I've copied it below, where those interested can integrate it into the current article if they like. Rick Norwood 18:48, 8 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

In Canada, conservatism followed British tradition well up into the 1980s, when the leadership of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney brought with it Reagan-style economic liberalism and free trade. Afterwards the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada changed to moderately favouring economic continentalism as opposed to the economic nationalism that it had previously promoted. However, many Canadian conservatives continued to favour the traditional Red Tory ideology of supporting economic independence (protectionism) and preservation of existing political and cultural institutions. At the same time, many "small-c" conservatives in Canada (especially in the western provinces) abandoned the PC Party to join the outspoken western activist Preston Manning and his Reform Party of Canada, which advocated even greater laissez-faire economic policy and stronger social-conservatism. In 2003, Canada's oldest political party (the PC Party) was disbanded and controversially merged with the Canadian Alliance (the descendant of the Reform Party) to create the new Conservative Party of Canada. The new party is arguably right-wing or neoconservative, although in early 2005, its political platform had yet to be fully developed, due to an election called by Liberal Party of Canada Prime minister Paul Martin in 2004. Although the new party increased its number of seats in parliament during the 2004 election, from 72 combined PC and Alliance seats to 99, its combined vote dropped significantly from 38% to only 29%, indicating that many Progressive Conservative voters did not vote for the new party. Recent polls have indicated that the new party is still haemorraging support thanks largely to their leader Stephen Harper and the extreme social conservative platform that the party advocates. The old Canadian conservative divide between Blue Tories (so-called "neoconservatives" and libertarians, mostly from the richer western provinces) and Red Tories (so-called "moderate" conservatives, mostly from Ontario and the poorer eastern provinces) is not as strong in the new party: most of the old PC Party's most prominent Red Tories, such as former Prime Minister Joe Clark, anti-free trade activist David Orchard, former Quebec Member of Parliament (MP) André Bachand, openly gay MP Scott Brison and others chose to oppose the merger and not join the new party.


Title

Why is this article called "Canadian Conservtism" and not "Canadian conservatism"? Is it about conservatism as a political ideology, or about Conservative parties only? Ground Zero | t 15:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC) Reviewing the article further, I see that it includes the BC Liberal, the ADQ, BU Unity, the Progressive Canadian Party, and so on, so it is not about Conservative parties, but about conservative parties. I will move the article accordingly. Ground Zero | t 19:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to Bloc Quebecois

I have removed a part of a paragraph making mention of the Bloc Quebecois. It seems to have been included because they may have a few conservative-leaning ideas and particularly because it has a handful of former Progressive Conservatives who joined the party. However, for all intents and purposes the Bloc Quebecois is regarded in Canada as a moderately democratic socialist group, and you would be hard-pressed to find any political commentator who would have any major disagreement on that point. Conservatives who joined the party did so mostly because they were interested in the sovereignty effort. Derekwriter 19:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

strange misuse of 'neoconservative'

This article repeatedly uses the word neoconservative in a manner that appears to be idiosyncratic, and not in keeping with its usual definition (for which see our article on the topic). The Reform Party of Canada is described here as "neoconservative", for example, which I have never seen before, and at times this article even seem to use "neoconservative" as a synonym for "neoliberal", which is quite seriously confused. --Delirium 11:04, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, this article is extremely biased. I will try to work on it in the next week. Rizla 20:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neoconservatism and Neoliberalism are interwined. Neoconservativism is a strong proponent of neoliberal economics, which includes free-trade agreements - essentially free-markets. Neoliberalism has nothing to do with social liberalism. Halogenated 04:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions To Improve The Article

This article requires a more thorough cleanup, as in its current form it inadequately lays out the history of conservative ideology and movements in Canada. Everything should be spelled out clearly, be logically arranged, and defer to a more neutral reading. I'd advise future writer/editors to pay more attention to the following areas:

The ideological roots of Red Toryism and the personalities and policies that defined this uniquely Canadian ideology: how did the likes of Grant and Camp articulate the Red Tory vision, and how was it put into practice by Diefenbaker, Davis, Clark, Lougheed, Roblin and others who engineered social policy?
Expand upon the rise and fall of Mulroney and his coalition of Western populist conservatives, Eastern Red Tories, and Quebec nationalists. What brought these groups together, why did they succeed in capturing back to back majority governments, and why did they fracture along ideological lines into three separate parties following the fall of Meech Lake?
An editor above claims to have excised references to the Bloc Quebecois based on his own personal perception that they are NOW a left-leaning party. It is a gross betrayal of the history of the conservative movement and ideology in Canada to remove them from this article, regardless of their perceived ideological positions now. The Quebec nationalists in the Mulroney PCs overwhelmingly backed the Blue Tory revolution. Why? Someone has to write about the shift from the strong federalism of the Red Tory tradition to the new decentralist attitudes of the Blue Tories, a significant factor in capturing the support of Quebec. Without the support of the Quebec faction of the PCs, Mulroney simply would not have been in power. Mulroney's decentralist agenda was THE compromise issue that kept both the Western and Quebec factions within the party until Meech Lake.
Similarly, in respect to Quebec, one can trace a thread between the old soft-nationalist, social conservative Union Nationale and Ralliement des Creditistes down to the Quebec conservatives in the Mulroney government that later broke off to form the Bloc Quebecois. It was only after the break from Mulroney that the Bloc became a "big tent" party that welcomed sovereignists and nationalists of various political stripes, and there was arguably a drift from conservatism over time.
The section concerning Social Credit needs to be cleaned up, and the ideological differences, and historical trends of the movement in Alberta, British Columbia and Quebec need to be separated more clearly. The Alberta Social Credit party was originally based on social credit theory, and was the heart of Christian conservatism in Canada, inspiring the Reform Party. The British Columbia party, on the other hand, never embraced social credit theory. They emerged as the "free enterprise" successor to the Conservative-Liberal alliance that was formed to keep the CCF from power, a coalition that included moderates, Red Tories and social conservatives. The reference to "staunchly conservative policies" should be removed, as it is both loaded and meaningless.
The way conservative ideology and movements coalesced in the West is certainly more complex than what is represented here. Manitoba, for example, tended toward a very Eastern-style Red Toryism in provincial politics, and often did not share the same populist protest-style conservatism the three other provinces had. Also, while Christian social movements in BC and Alberta were generally conservative and grouped around the SoCreds provincially and the PCs federally, in Saskatchewan and Manitoba Christians tended toward CCF-style social democracy.
I would argue against using the word neoconservative at all in this article, as it never really gained a foothold as a descriptor in Canada. It is rarely used in the media, by political commentators or by activists themselves. It is perhaps completely irrelevant to Canadian politics. Hipsterlady 02:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neoconservatism in Canada

It's easy to identify ideological neo-Conservatives in the United States. They tend to be well educated, and sometimes have affiliations outside of politics. Examples include Irving Kristol, Bill Kristol, (Canadian born) David Frum, Richard Pearle, (Canadian born) David Brooks, Paul Wolfowitz, Allan Bloom, and Leo Strauss.

Who personifies neo-conservatism in Canada?

No one. Neo-conservatism is a special little isolated branch of thinking, who follows that prof from Chicagos teaching, it is premised on American exceptionalism. See the UK documentary called "Power of Nightmares" to learn about neoconservatism. It is an ideology specific to the US, and not exportable, or exported. Ottawakismet (talk) 23:58, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest reading Professor Stephen Clarkson UNCLE SAM and US University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 2002 . Also subtitled "Uncle Sam and US - Neoconservitivism and the Canadian State" (Clarkson is a professor at the University of Toronto.)

In the Canadian (economic) Context, Neoliberal and Neoconservitive are pretty much interchangable terms. Canadian Neoconservitism is basicly economic neoliberalism : "Free" Trade, deregulation, privitization, government downsizing. From the evidence of the past Liberal federal government, and the observations of this book, I would add the Federal Liberal Party as a "Neoconservitive" Party and as "Neoliberal". Clarkson writes of the "Mulrooney-Chretien era", having consistant policies dealing with free trade, taxes, and government spending.

Paul Martin was Chretien's finance minister, as Prime Minister his first act was a spending freeze subject to his review. Martian said with pride as he delivered a budget, "This is the biggest demobilization of ".. Canadian governemnt/civil service... [I can't recall the exact word he used ] " since World War II."

The former Liberal Government took Neoconservitive positions in international trade (evidence: ratifying NAFTA with no substantial changes (1993), negociation of the M.A.I. (1997), expansion of Free Trade to Chile and others.


Filling in the gaps

Lots of work needed here.

We have a huge gap from the death of Macdonald all the way to Joe Clark, nearly a hundred years. I've made some chapters of what I think should fill in the gap, much of which relies upon Diefenbaker's memoirs.

I find it incredible that we have an article here without a single link to Preston Manning. I will add more on the history of reform, and you can't really talk about progressive conservativism without also talking about how it never was successful until Mulroney altered it for his own purposes. We have a considerable amount on Clark, but nothing on poor Stanfield who ran under the PC banner longer then anyone else.

Benkenobi18 06:14, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Writing and References

The quality of writing here is good, but there are absolutely no references to back up any of it. I'm not necessarily disputing what has been written, but without some referencing it could be easily seen as biased and one person/group's perspective. Halogenated 04:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baldwin a Tory?

Since when? Baldwin was a Reformer, the Reformers are the ancestors of the Liberals. Furthermore he argued for resposible government and cooperation with the French; reducing the powers of the governor and anglo elites, a most un-tory position. He was more moderate than his Reform ancestors like Mackenzie, but he was a Reformer notheless. After the Baldwin era, then Tories reconcilled themselves with responsible government and the French fact, and that's why Macdonald and Cartier worked together so well, but before that the Tories were the party of the elite and governor against democracy and against the French, and they weren't shy about it! Kevlar67 18:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History section

Instead of retalling the entire history of conservative parties it should only deal with commonalities and general trends. Sections on specific eras should only summerize and contain links to the important figures and movements, and parties, for example:

etc.

Will do more then I have more time. Kevlar67 (talk) 22:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger is a bad idea

Section reorg

The sections have been reorganized for better consistency with the more developed articles Conservatism and Conservatism in the United States. Lionel (talk) 10:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Conservatism in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conservatism in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:08, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conservatism in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Conservatism in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with List of conservative parties in Canada

Conservatism in Canada already has a list of conservative and right-of-centre political parties which appears up to date, and the non-list information either already is or can be integrated into the Conservatism article. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Conservatism_in_Canada