A recent edit has reworded this article so that it names the station as St Werburgh's Road. Given that we already have St Werburgh's Road Metrolink station, I propose that the two articles be merged, with the target article name being whatever can be verified as the true name of the proposed tram stop. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These two are the latest official network maps: Leaflet public display board I didnt know there were two pages for the same station, it was briefly to be called Chorlton High during the latter half of 2009/early 2010 but the name change was dropped as they didnt want to advertise that there was a school nearby during one of the regular tabloid paedophile hysteria outbreaks. Oh when doing merge careful of the line info boxes, they seem to be different versions, not sure which is correct.WatcherZero (talk) 18:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like a duplicate - might as well merge, given that there are no objections. Likelife (talk) 12:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I understand now: "line info boxes" = "route boxes". I'll use whichever one closest matches the routeboxes on the stops either side. That is the only significant diff, although one has two more gallery images than the other, and there are typos in each which don't occur in the other. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:49, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now merged. The routebox already on St Werburgh's Road was consistent with the three stops each side. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:50, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]