Talk:Choose the right
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"r"/"R"
Shouldn't the R be capped in the title? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thmazing (talk • contribs) 03:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Merge
Two stubs These articles are both stubs, and it seems likely to me they are destined to stay that way; merging them would create one more thorough article. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support - This would make good logical sense. CTR ring could then link to CTR. Kristmace (talk) 13:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- I've merged the articles, but they now need cleaning up to remove all repeated informationKristmace (talk) 13:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Trademark
The following information has been moved out of the article and placed here for discussion
- STYLIZED CTR EMBLEM WITHIN SHIELD - REGISTERED TRADEMARK
- The only authorized use of the stylized CTR emblem within shield for commercial use is through a license agreement available through the Church Copyrights and Permissions Office for needle work patterns and for ring jewelry which must be 14K gold or sterling silver. No other commercial uses of the stylized CTR emblem within shield, including tie tacks, lapel pins, stickers, clothing items, or any other printed or jewelry items, are authorized. Any such use would be considered an unfair trade practice
This claim is unsubstantiated and directly contradicts text that was already in article. Please discuss this before reinserting this (or similar text) into the article. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 18:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- A quick google search on "trademark" and "Church Copyrights and Permissions Office" comes back with no results regarding the phrase Choose The Right or the stylized CTR emblem. I also tried other variations, replacing the word trademark with CTR, "Choose The Right", ring, shield, and gold with no related results. However the sentence stating that there is no trademark is also without citation, so I have added a fact tag to it. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 18:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Promotional language
The article itself and several of its citations link offline to retailers for this object affiliated with the church. These items should be removed, per WP:NOTADVERTISING - "articles that are directly trying to sell a product to our readers." 203.206.97.159 (talk) 01:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC)