This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook Conservatism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: Libertarianism This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as High-importance).

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: RyanRichard, Mayahernandez.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 16:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Begun the article, hopefully will expand later as I finish reading it --KingZog 00:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Completely rewrote and expanded the article --LittleDan 00:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning the merge with economic totalitarianism, the problem is that if you go to its talk page, you will see that it has been nominated for deletion several times with good and informed arguments. The deletion process' result was either arbitrary "speedy keep" or arbitrary "keep" with the claims that good arguments in favor of its conservation had been made (such as the proposal to create a economic fish article, and I'm serious, someone - trolling or not - proposed to do so seriously; I don't know if himself took it seriously, but apparently others have taken his comment literally). To merge it here would only be a half-satisfying measure, as the expression itself, which has no scholarly signification, wasn't even coined by Friedman. Tazmaniacs 00:02, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]