This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Country music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong Women in Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

• ... that Sabrina Carpenter wrote the song "Busy Woman" just after submitting Short n' Sweet and was sad it could not be included on the album?

• ALT1: ... that Sabrina Carpenter was sad that the song "Busy Woman" could not be included on Short n' Sweet and later released it as a "thank you" to her fans? Source: Variety
• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Zheng Zhegu

NØ 06:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

Overall: This is a well-composed and well-sourced article. I prefer ALT1 because it provides more details and fleshes out the hook, and the Variety source supports it. Spotchecked sources 9 and 11 and found no issues. Earwig shows no copyvio. (There is a 35.1% similarity with the Capital source, but mainly due to direct quotes.) QPQ done. Good to go! —👑PRINCE of EREBOR📜 14:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]