This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article was accepted from this draft on 3 July 2021 by reviewer Bkissin (talk· contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
But most reliable sources use 'BTV Chittagong'. I'll rename it to Chattogram if Wikipedia agrees to use it in its official article. Ilhamnobi (talk) 00:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable English-language sources).
Up until April 2018, when NICAR declared the new English spelling for the district, all sources used BTV Chittagong. An example is The Financial Express (2017). Some sources continued using it, such as Dhaka Tribune 1Dhaka Tribune 2 (2019, 2021). Other sources switched to BTV Chattogram, for example: bdnews24.com (2019), New Age (2019), The Independent (2020), The Daily Star (2020) and BSS (2021). (Facebook and YouTube aren't independent, so they don't count.)
My advice is to state both names in the article. Only move the article after a majority of the cited sources use BTV Chattogram. That's a stronger condition than Wikipedia sets, but I think it will avoid confusion and argument. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
X
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung