Eisspeedway

Talk:Astrophilately

2006-7 posts

It just so happens I have a flown cover available to scan in, give me a moment. Will have to be fair use, sigh. Stan 03:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The definition, and indeed the entire entry, are far too restrictive. It makes no mention of astronomy or even unmanned spacecraft. The entry concentrates entirely on human spaceflight, in particular flown covers, which amounts to only a fraction of the subject of astrophilately. Currently the entry is unbalanced, seemingly reflecting the author's own specialized interest, and needs serious revision. Skeptic2 17:41, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I misinterpreted the FIP page, which focussed on manned spaceflight, but actually defined the field more broadly. In the absence of any actual specialists editing this article (I don't do astrophilately myself), we try to make do. Stan 06:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:STS-8 flight cover 8912 back.jpg

Image:STS-8 flight cover 8912 back.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Astrophilately. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Astrophilately. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Astrophilately. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]