Eisspeedway

Talk:Arctic Refuge drilling controversy

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kphelps1991.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article is a hoax

I have never heard of a carribou. What the hell are they, like fake penguines or something. Stupid eviro-eliteists making up fake birds...

Drill baby drill. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.51.209.11 (talk) 14:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Their Reindeer. they Kinda look like a cross between a deer and a moose. Joesolo13 (talk) 00:12, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muskrats

In the history section it mentions that muskrats were given the right to select land....what in the hell do muskrats have to do with anything? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.184.118 (talk) 01:12, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two things

  • During a floor session of the Alaska Legislature today, one of the members (I forget which one, but perhaps Anna Fairclough?) read an item that a vote was held today in Congress allowing limited drilling. I haven't looked this up in the news. Is it relevant to the article?

Concept

Pipe + Path of least resistance to Storage for further usage.

Similar to straw+suction+stomach. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.120.65.78 (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Arctic Refuge drilling controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:50, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Arctic Refuge drilling controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Units

The readability of the article as a whole would be improved by standardization of units. My suggestion is:

  • Land area: square miles (km2) acres (ha) ... To address the argument for acres (ha), see below)
  • Oil volume: bbl (m3). Standardize on billions, even if a few citations of millions will look small)
  • Flow: million barrels per day (106 m3/d)

As far as citations are concerned, I trust editors to do the math properly.
Use of standard measures will eliminate NPOV problems with hyperbole. Rhadow (talk) 16:39, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The units stuff is still kind of hard on the reader. Stuff like
the opening of ANWR reaches 780,000 barrels per day (124,000 m3/d) in 2027 and then declines to 710,000 barrels per day (113,000 m3/d) in 2030. In the low and high ANWR oil resource cases, additional oil production resulting from the opening of ANWR peaks in 2028 at 510,000 and 1.45 million barrels per day (231,000 m3/d), respectively.
is starts to look like wallpaper. We probably want a lot of these figures expressed in much rounder numbers in the prose, while accompanying the text with tables giving the precise values. Some units are hopeless, like Barrel (unit)#Oil barrels. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Arctic Refuge drilling controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Arctic Refuge drilling controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues

This is listed as a B-class article and included in the criteria (#1) is: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. The lead has a 2020 "citation needed" tag that needs sourcing. -- Otr500 (talk) 15:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]