This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Websites: Computing Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance). Journalism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Africa Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I propose the speedy delete to be taken away. It is claimed that the article is spam. I don't think it is, but not only that the article is sufficiently notable to be included. See Alexa data. It does need references, sourcing, wikifying etc but not deletion. --Javit 01:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability As best as I can tell, this site does not meet notability guidelines. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 01:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have now provided external sources per WP:Notability (web), which makes me remove the speedy delete. You can take it to AfD if you like, but my opinion is that it wouldn't be constructive. Best thing is to improve the article's subject matter. --Javit 01:43, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense These are some pretty credible sources; full speed ahead, as far as I'm concerned. As an aside, might it be wiser to have an article on the parent company and mention the web site? Is this site ever really going to justify its own article? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 03:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]