This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Enforcement Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Politics: American Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance). Sociology: Social Movements Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the social movements task force. United States: District of Columbia / Presidential elections / Government / History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as High-importance). United States Presidents: Donald Trump Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Presidents, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of United States Presidents on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States PresidentsWikipedia:WikiProject United States PresidentsTemplate:WikiProject United States PresidentsUnited States Presidents Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Donald Trump task force. U.S. Congress Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) Events(s). Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Dhtwiki, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on February 15–17, 2024.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

	Other talk page banners

Add US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to Parties list Add US Marshal Service to Parties list Add Arlington County Police to Parties list Add US Park Police to Parties List

Nhryan122 (talk) 05:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. FifthFive (talk) 03:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the portal bar and the authority control templates were replaced with #invoke call in this edit, along with many other template calls, in an attempt to reduce post-expand include size. Can these two be reverted as the rest have, or is there some special reason not to? All the best: Rich Farmbrough 13:43, 8 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

On page 69 it says that Miller disobeyed an order from Trump because Miller did not want the public to view him as a "Trump crony." I think this may be relevant enough to add to the article, but I'd like to know what others think.

https://cha.house.gov/_cache/files/6/d/6dae7b82-7683-4f56-a177-ba98695e600d/145DD5A70E967DEEC1F511764D3E6FA1.final-interim-report.pdf#page71

The Last Hungry Cat (talk) 19:23, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this was a violent attack on the US government and there are many sources that support the characterization of the event as a coup, but not many of these sources are of high reliability or high neutrality, and some seem to just say that the labeling of the event as a "coup" has been popular (not saying that that's what the event actually was). If you need me to show some reliable sources of my own, here are some that call the "coup" term into dispute or use the word "riot" instead: https://www.maxwell.syr.edu/news/article/was-jan-6-an-insurrection-a-failed-coup-cleary-discusses-with-politico https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/01/04/a-look-back-at-americans-reactions-to-the-jan-6-riot-at-the-u-s-capitol/ https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/08/19/jan-6-coup-authoritarianism-expert-roundtable-00052281 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67889403

LordOfWalruses (talk) 02:24, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A source not saying coup, is not the same as a source saying it was not a coup. Slatersteven (talk) 11:29, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The source did not describe a self coup. We should not be putting words into sources. Slothwizard (talk) 23:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well they did say that the classification of the Jan. 6 riot as a coup is in dispute. The article should say that some/many have described the event as a coup, though this article shouldn’t state that clarification as a certified fact. LordOfWalruses (talk) 00:28, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep it here. Correditor56 (talk) 16:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it's not going anywhere EvergreenFir (talk) 17:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As with the above, it ain't going anywhere. Slatersteven (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but protect it from any vandalism Correditor56 (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We don't protect pages preemptively. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the page should be protected from vandalism. I would suggest entering a ticket at the Wikipedia:Requests for page protection I don't see why the consensus would reject this but I would still go ahead and submit the ticket. Butterscotch5 (talk) 17:41, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already put in a ticket. Correditor56 (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]