Talk:2017 Teterboro Learjet crash
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2017 Teterboro Learjet crash/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: RandomInfinity17 (talk · contribs) 18:11, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: RoySmith (talk · contribs) 23:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I'm afraid I'm going to have to fail this immediately per WP:GAFAIL item 3 ("It has ... cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid") and WP:PAGENUM. This has been tagged for a full year for "cites its sources but does not provide page references". The vast majority of this article is sourced to the NTSB report which is 133 pages long. It needs pages numbers for each and every citation to that report. RoySmith (talk) 23:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
GA page numbers
Hello @RoySmith. Not that this is going to change anything but just to clarify, you stated that the article had been tagged for the inclusion of page numbers for a year. That was a mistake on my part. I had mistakenly typed "2024" instead of "2025". See the edit. Apologies for the mistake on my part. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:52, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
