This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kingdom of Naples, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Kingdom of NaplesWikipedia:WikiProject Kingdom of NaplesTemplate:WikiProject Kingdom of NaplesKingdom of Naples
Quake name
Is this quake usually known as the "Great Neapolitan Earthquake?" Because normally, by Wikipedia standards, it would be called something like "1857 Basilicata earthquake." See, for example, List of earthquakes in Italy. Rees11 (talk) 00:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
i thik it is — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.224.17.246 (talk) 05:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Depth of focus etc.
The second paragraph of the section on "Scientific study" gives the length of the "fissure" as 10 miles, its height as 31 miles and the depth of focus as 65 miles. Mallet actually estimated these parameters as 9 miles, 3 miles and 5.75 miles respectively (Davison 1921), so I don't know where these other numbers were taken from. As I work on expanding the article I will be correcting these. Mikenorton (talk) 19:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung