This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance). Video games Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department) Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Since a notability template found itself on this article yet again, I need to point out that, at this point, C-evo passes the WP:THREE test for notability:

• Sánchez-Pelegrín, Rubén; Díaz-Agudo, Belén (2005), "An Intelligent Decision Module based on CBR for C-evo", Proceedings of the 2005 IJCAI Workshop on Reasoning, Representation, and Learning in Computer Games, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 90–94, retrieved 2021-05-10
• Sánchez-Pelegrín, Rubén; Gómez-Martín, Marco Antonio; Díaz-Agudo, Belén (2005), A CBR Module for a Strategy Videogame, pp. 217–226, retrieved 2021-05-10
• Oliver Clare (2007-01-29). "Priceless Victories". Eurogamer. Retrieved 2015-06-16. (There has been some discussion about how substantial this 189 word mention is. It’s not a full article, but it’s, for the purposes of establishing notability, significant coverage, enough for C-evo to cross the “three references” finish line).

A couple of other references to further cement notability:

• Marchelletta, Courtney. "Free Game: "C-evo" (PC)". about.com. Archived from the original on 2012-07-18. Retrieved 2015-06-16. (it’s an archived now-dead link, but WP:NTEMP applies here)
• Courtney Marchelletta. "Best Free Sim Games You Can Download". Archived from the original on 2021-05-10.

(Depending on how we count, this is either one or two references. Anyway, since three other references have been listed, whether this particular reference establishes notability is a moot point, since notability has already been established.)

One reference which used to be in the article:

• Civilizations: Webster’s Quotations, Facts and Phrases. ICON Group International, Inc. 2008. p. 256. ISBN 0546662633. (This book can not be viewed in Google Books, so I have no idea if this is a passing mention or a significant mention)

Some other stuff not in the article; these, again, further the notability already established in the three references above.

• https://www.download-free-games.com/pc/c_evo.htm
• https://www.indiedb.com/games/c-evo
• https://www.moddb.com/games/c-evo
• https://freewargamer.com/c-evo/
• https://launchpad.net/c-evo

There’s also a two to three paragraph discussion of C-evo (and FreeCiv) in a masters level thesis where the thesis writer explained why they didn’t use C-evo for their thesis, despite the fact it has been used by other researchers. I’m not 100% sure a thesis can be used to establish notability, though.

That in mind, C-evo clearly passes Wiki’s notability requirements. Please do not add the “notability” template again without discussing it here first. Samboy (talk) 08:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]