Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank, Gerda! :) Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 15:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Four years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:01, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hurra to me from me. :) Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 14:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alles Gute zum Geburtstag -- trotz die Tatsache, mein Wünsch doch verspätet ist ! --Obenritter (talk) 01:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you! Haha, kein Angst, I "forgive" you pal :) Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 19:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doctor Papa Jones. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I vote for Comrade Stalin. Regards. Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 07:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doctor Papa Jones!

Would you have any interest in translating the featured article Elcor, Minnesota for the Danish Wikipedia? Since many of the immigrants who settled here were from Scandanavia, I think having the article translated in this language is important, especially for any relatives of former residents who are looking for information about the town. Thanks! DrGregMN (talk) 15:07, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure DrGregMN. I'll ping you. Best, Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 16:21, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm translating this into Finnish per request, for the same reasons of demographic history. So far I'm having fun with it, but beware, there's a lot of U.S. property and company law and administrative unit terminology as well as specialized mining terms that are not so easy to translate. You can contact me if you are running into problems with some of those. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:17, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, I see Finnusertop! Well, thanks for the "warning". I'll make sure to contact you if I feel the need to do so. Depending on how much time I'll have to spare for Wikipedia this week, there's a chance I'll start with small translation and then expand on it later maybe, I don't know yet. We'll see. Best, Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 21:56, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you guys!DrGregMN (talk) 15:44, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I will delay the promised translation till Wednesday as I'm just so busy with university stuff at the moment! Best, Doctor Papa Jones • (Click here to collect your prize!) 16:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello DPJ!

I'm sorry to bother you, I see you contributed to the Honour Chevron of the Old Guard article. I am having some difficulty with an editor who know claims that this, along with the Blood Order and the Golden Party Badge are "trivial" awards and are not to be linked to in other articles. As you contributed to the Blood Order article, I'm hoping you don't consider it a trivial award? My problem is that I don't see what is wrong with linking to a stand-alone article, like the Honour Chevron of the Old Guard, in another article, such as the Ernst Röhm article, which I've been adding content to. I don't see what function a stand-alone article serves if you are not allowed to provide a link to it in another article? I also don't see how it is now, based on one editor's say-so, a "trivial" award? I have asked him why I can't link to a stand-alone article but have received no reply, other than it is now menial and not permitted to be linked. This has happened to me on many occasions, with many awards and decorations. I have asked for a list of so-called "trivial" awards so I know not to link to them again, have my added content deleted and wait for the inevitable aggressive warning (see my talk page). Again, no such list has been made available by this editor, so what do I do? Just add links to stand-alone articles and hope for the best or just stop adding links to stand-alone articles? The thing is, I have added many awards and decorations to many articles, but they still stand, so I'm at a loss as to why it's ok to provide links in some articles but not the ones that the editor in question is monitoring. I'm not asking you to take sides or anything like that, what I would greatly appreciate is your input on the Ernst Röhm talk page. If you feel stand-alone articles are not to be linked, fair enough. If you think it's ok, it would be helpful for the consensus of editors ruling on this. If you also don't view the Honour Chevron of the Old Guard, the Blood Order or the Golden Party Badge or any others as "trivial", which I'm thinking you don't as you took the time to add to the article, it would be greatly appreciated if you could say so. I just don't see the problem with linking to stand-alone articles. If they're not link-worthy, what function do they serve?

Thank you for your time

Troy Troy von Tempest (talk) 00:58, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Nazi Party and SS member Wilhelm Brückner in 1924.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doctor Papa Jones. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Doctor Papa Jones. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:1940 Field Marshal Ceremony.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doctor Papa Jones: Yes I still need it translated. So here it is again.[1]. And when you are done translating this article for me I will have a second one for you to translate.Catfurball (talk) 17:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doctor Papa Jones: Can you translate another article for me. Here it is [2].Catfurball (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah fuck I didn't see this message either !! Yes, I'm happy to help any way I can, but not this weekend I'm afraid. I'll get on it monday or tuesday. Peace. Doctor Papa Jones • (Heeya!) 17:40, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Doctor Papa Jones: Did you forget to translate Sine Renlev for me.Catfurball (talk) 16:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't think less of me, but yeah... I kinda did. Sorry about that. I'll translate it this weekend. Peace. Doctor Papa Jones • (Heeya!) 00:19, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Finally. Sorry for the long delay. I'm pretty much retired from Wikipedia; I just forgot to remove my name from the list of available translators. Peace! Doctor Papa Jones • (Heeya!) 19:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Sine Renlev, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 04:24, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll leave this to Catfurball to sort out. Peace! Doctor Papa Jones • (Heeya!) 17:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]