User talk:BozoTheScary: Difference between revisions
GrapefruitFarmer (talk | contribs) |
Weatherdude (talk | contribs) iiio |
||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
I added more info to the grapefruit article. Do you like my advertizement for people to eat more grapefruit? (Just joking.) [[User:GrapefruitFarmer|GrapefruitFarmer]] 02:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
I added more info to the grapefruit article. Do you like my advertizement for people to eat more grapefruit? (Just joking.) [[User:GrapefruitFarmer|GrapefruitFarmer]] 02:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
Sorry mr. bozo.[[User:Weatherdude|bob]] 15:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:41, 1 January 2007
Welcome!
Hello, BozoTheScary, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - BanyanTree 23:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Boss Hoss
Hi,
"Without prejudice" means that the DRV doesn't prevent composing a new article: it's good for you. :) Best wishes, Xoloz 15:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Wow and the Wolof language.
I left a comment on Talk:Wow for why I reverted your change. Just giving you a heads-up; if you have some evidence otherwise, feel free to bring it up! SnowFire 05:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
re: Aberzombie
I apologize; I did not see the previous prod. Normally I check histories for this sort of thing but it must have slipped my mind. I see the new reference; however, with the new information I still think that the best course is either to delete or possibly merge into Abercrombie and Fitch as a legal case side note. Crystallina 03:06, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Boss Hoss
Hi,
Sadly, the deletion log cannot be modified. Any reasonable admin would figure things out by looking at the timestamps in the log and the history, and the quality of your article now. I'll really tempted to delete that talk page, because that comment (posted today, but dated 6 July?) is very confusing to anyone. Best wishes, Xoloz 17:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Grapefruit Article
Please do a little research on the forbidden fruit and add a sentence or two to the history section about it.
Here is a start for the history section.
>>> Grapefruit was known as the forbidden fruit in some cultures.
Or just add the sentence above. Or change to make it a better sentence.
Thanks. GrapefruitFarmer 22:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Please rewrite anyway as you wish. Thank you so much. GrapefruitFarmer 22:15, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Placement is Key. Does the forbidden fruit history belong in the history section or under Grapefruit lore? Try googling forbidden fruit grapefruit on a search engine. GrapefruitFarmer 22:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Please Click >>> http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=forbidden+fruit+grapefruit&prssweb=Search&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&x=wrt
I do not know if it was "originally described" In some areas it was once known as or called the forbidden fruit. Where did you get the part "originally described"?
How about "originally named' or "originally claimed"? GrapefruitFarmer 22:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
The definition of described means reported. Saying grapefruit was originally reported as the forbidden fruit... does not seem to be correct grammer but I could be wrong. I will leave it up to you for the final decision. Thanks for your help. GrapefruitFarmer 23:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
I changed the word described to named. I think it reads more clearly now. This grapefruit article is great now. GrapefruitFarmer 23:27, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
I added more info to the grapefruit article. Do you like my advertizement for people to eat more grapefruit? (Just joking.) GrapefruitFarmer 02:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Sorry mr. bozo.bob 15:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)